The BBC3 documentary that broke all the rules on reporting suicide
Stacey Dooley's programme was ill-judged and offensive, says Chris Atkins.
By Chris Atkins Published 24 July 2012 17:05
One of the things you learn very quickly in documentaries, and in media as a whole, is that by covering a problem you can make it worse. “Car jacking” didn’t exist in the USA until the The Detroit News gave it that name after a single incident in 1991, after which it spread like wildfire. The reporting of mass killings can sometimes spark copycat incidents, especially if the news focuses too much on the killer and the gory details, rather than the victims. The tabloids gleefully labelling the alleged Aurora suspect “The Batman Killer” is a case in point. But the area where misreporting can do the most damage is suicide. In 2010 the police asked the media to stop covering the suicides in Bridgend as they (and others) believed that the coverage by the national tabloids was making things worse.
To address this problem the Samaritans have drawn up very simple media guidelines on the dos and don’ts of reporting suicide. The introduction makes it clear that:
Inappropriate reporting or depiction can lead to “copycat suicides” particularly amongst younger or more vulnerable audiences. Reporting details that can seem inconsequential and merely factual to some audiences can have a profoundly negative effect on others who might be more emotionally vulnerable.
Given this was written by one of the most respected journalists at the BBC, Jeremy Paxman, it may surprise some to learn that a recent BBC3 documentary seemed to break most of the guidelines in a single five-minute scene. The programme in question is called Japan, Fall of the Rising Sun, a documentary following presenter Stacey Dooley as she travels the world to see what effect the economic crisis is having on the young. My personal opinion is that it was shockingly bad taste to have such a sombre and serious subject approached in a lightweight “yoof” tone. What is not a matter of opinion was how the scene broke the Samaritans guidelines on reporting suicide numerous times.
From the Samaritans guidelines: Avoid labeling places as suicide “hotspots”
Exercise caution in reporting suicide locations
The section starts with Dooley in a car on the way to a popular Japanese suicide spot, telling the audience: “Right now I’m heading to a forest where people go to end their lives. Over the past twenty years thousands have come here to die.”
Don’t romanticise suicide or make events surrounding it melodramatic
As Dooley is guided up to the suicide hotspot she tries to inject some drama into her journey by turning to the camera with a faux scared look saying “I feel a little bit uneasy!”
Discourage the use of permanent memorials
Dooley then ghoulishly observes that there are many ominous white lines in the ground, which turn out to be trails left by people who have come to end their lives.
Avoid simplistic explanations for suicide
Avoid brushing over the realities of suicide
Dooley then turns to camera and ponders “you’d have to think about the kinda place you’d have to be in to come somewhere like this and think ‘this is my only way out’.”
Discourage the use of permanent memorials (again)
She then deliberately stumbles onto an area where there have clearly been many deaths “we’ve come across an old camp, the trees surrounding it are covered in writing” which her translator tells us read “they’re all dead, we’re all dead”
Avoid simplistic explanations for suicide (again)
She then tells us that “since 1998, in the wake of the slump, suicides have risen to over 30,000 a year.”
Discourage the use of permanent memorials (again)
Around the corner Dooley finds a small shrine on the spot where someone took their life.
She then proffers an observation which she seems to think might have saved hundreds of lives: “These people obviously weren’t totally alone because people have come here to put flowers, so perhaps if they’d have just…” and she shrugs as though this single thought could have eradicated Japan’s suicide culture. She then hugs her translator in a blatantly-staged show of respect, running completely counter to the belligerent and offensive nature of her presence.
Dooley’s insights are now unstoppable: “I think this is really important to have a real think about, because at home we’re all moaning, and saying, you know, the government, the economy, X, Y and Z, you know, things aren’t great, but I don’t think we’re seriously seriously worried that it could affect a whole generation at this stage, but what if our economy is in a bad way for 20 years?” (cut to shot of interpreter praying at the spot where someone ended their life) “so… it’s a real worry isn’t it? It’s a big thing.” Fortunately this documentary isn’t available in Japan so the family of the suicide victim on whose grave she delivered this banal monologue is spared hearing such crass nonsense from the place a loved one died.
Mercifully at this point she moves on, but the whole style and tone of the section also breached:
Don’t romanticise suicide or make events surrounding it melodramatic
The Samaritans guidelines request that if you are going to cover suicide there are some positive things you can include:
Encourage public understanding around the complexity of suicide
Expose the common myths about suicide
Include details of further sources of information and advice
None were included in Dooley’s program.
Misreporting suicide is common in the news and broadcast media as a whole, but the guidelines are there for a reason. Let’s use them.
Chris Atkins is a London-based film-director. He was the director of Starsuckers. For advice about the issues raised in this post, you can read more on the Samaritans website.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists





















15 comments
Comments on this article are now closed.
Out of all the people on our TV screens that represent the younger generation you choose to criticize Stacey Dooley? At least she takes interest in the world around her and attempts to shed some light on current affairs.
And if i'm honest compared to most of the journalist industry around the world her shows are focused on real issues and real people instead of pointless news and stupid celebrities.
Very disappointed with this article.
From the tiny clips I saw I thought Stacey Dooley was a dimwit - it seems I may have been correct.
More worryingly, it seems to me that she really isn't as dimwitted as she portrays, this is an act to appeal to the targeted demographic who it seems likely are to dim or naive to realise that she, her editors and producers and commissioning editor are no better than Jeremy Kyle and his producers, editors and commissioning editors.
Surely it should be "too dim" rather than "to dim" in the above rant about stupidity.
"One of the things you learn very quickly in documentaries, and in media as a whole, is that by covering a problem you can make it worse."
Surely this should be learned *before* you are let loose on the public? Don't journalism degrees cover this kind of thing? The effect the media has on shaping culture and mass consciousness and behaviour? How influence and propaganda works?
It's beyond me how so many people trot out the tired and demonstrably false lines "I can tell the difference between fantasy and reality" or "the media doesn't affect people".
I wished that the Levison enquiry concentrated more time on this. Because surely freedom of the press does not include freedom to incite discrimination, crime and suicide?
Her reporting on the economic crisis in Ireland was equally as simplistic, patronising and completely lacking in insight.
The fact that the subjects didnt string her up is testimony to their self -restriant
She is better suited for programmes closer to her intellectual level - Geordie Shore, 16 and pregnant, etc etc.
Stacey done well.
http://kit-electronics.org.ua/
Stacey done well. I think she brought a much needed re-connection and re-education of viewers by delivering a younger perspective regarding the horrorible consequences of the recession etc. I do not think anything was presented in any way that was anything but serious and honest. But understandably coverage of such serious issues was destined to aggrieve some.
The programmes were factual and - if i am honest - unexpectedly sobering. It was difficult to learn of such tragedies caused by the financial issues. But I am glad i watched and now appreciate just what exactly people are going through in Greece etc so I commend Stacey and co for their work.
The attack on Stacey Dooley was ill-judged and offensive.
'Stacey Dooley's programme was ill-judged and offensive'
----------------------
You refer to her in person throughout your article. What about the producers, researchers and director of this programme ? Surely they are more responsible for the content?
I live in Bridgend, I thank God the run of suicides have stopped.
Rules were broken, yes. Sometimes it is better for the truth to come out.
This article concentrates on the park where the suicides took place.
The documentary as a whole showed how some people were abused by their employers and others had managed to escape this kind of abuse by communal living. Which gave hope.
In South Wales jobs are getting scarce but I get the feeling young people here definitely have a sense of community and tend to look after each other more so than in my generation.
And if any entrepreneurs read this may I also say we're still very much open for business.
If Stacey Dooley wants to do a documentary here in South Wales on how people are coping with the economic crisis then bring it on. Her sympathetic attitude is the kind of reporting that is lacking in our media.
Yes, let's stop talkin about suicide. That will make the problem go away.
But seriously, the western world, and "normal", happy people have a very unfortunate relationship to suicide. Suicide is seen as something bad, to be swept under the rug. All the while, unhappy people keep dying in hideous, painful, gory ways.
We need to start talking about suicide, we need to give people a peaceful option of ending their own life, if they so choose, and guidance and counselling to help them reconsider.
If suicide stays taboo, the people who really need help won't ask for it, and people will keep jumping from bridges and in front of trains. Sigh.
yeah not wanting people to talk about suicide because it is taboo, that was exactly the point he was making. Did you even read the article?
Suicide IS something bad you moron.
Read: Britain on the couch, by Owen James, for why we are a sad and unhappy society despite being materially richer.
When was the last time that you was really happy?
Why are people from the industrialised economies feeling that their is only one way out and what's happened to welfare, compassion and to look after thy neighbour?