The meaning of life? Don’t ask

They arrive on bookshop tables with comforting regularity: Blink, Nudge, Sway, The Wisdom of Crowds, The Black Swan. Abstract, playful titles that suggest a theory of everything. In the past decade, the stream of behavioural economics titles for the general reader has intensified. They are books that stray dangerously close to pop psychology, but are rescued from the self-help shelf by dint of being the preferred bedtime reading of the modern politician.

Daniel Kahneman's Thinking Fast and Slow is the latest in the chain. Kahneman, a 77-year-old Israeli-American psychologist who won the Nobel Prize for Economics in 2002, is soon to visit London and is booked to give the customary No 10 seminar - another brainy visitor who might offer some helpful psychological trick of the light.

They might have picked the wrong guy in Kahneman, who is tentative to the point of self-defeating. In Thinking Fast and Slow, Kahneman describes two systems of human thought: System 1 and System 2. System 1 is our instinctive, intuitive mode of thinking; System 2 is more considered and logical. Often we only use System 1 - relying on gut instinct to make choices, rather than rationally considering all eventualities. System 1 sometimes gets it right. But it can also be guilty of propelling us into poor decision-making.

If the book was called How to Change Your Life and Make Better Decisions, TODAY! or - in the Malcolm Gladwell vein, Slow - you might expect a final chapter that instructs the reader in how to more frequently employ System 2 to one's advantage, and how to be wary of the pitfalls of System 1. But Kahneman, when we speak on the phone, reveals that he is "not a great believer in self-help" or good intentions.

At the end of the book, Kahneman uses himself as an example to illustrate the limitations of his research: "System 1 is not readily educable. Except for some effects that I attribute mostly to my age, my intuitive thinking is just as prone to overconfidence, extreme predictions, and the planning fallacy as it was before I made a study of these issues. I have improved only in my ability to recognise situations in which errors are likely - and I have made much more progress in recognising the errors of others than my own."

Misery index

Kahneman tells me he would prefer to "measure misery" than well-being to influence public policy, for example. "It's not so much that you can't measure well-being - you can. But there is a moral question as to what the business of government is, and I would prefer to reduce misery rather than increase happiness." He believes that unrealistic optimism was largely responsible for the 2008 financial crisis - from people buying mortgages they couldn't afford to financial institutions failing accurately to calculate risk.

I ask him what he hopes to achieve when he visits No 10. “I really have no idea," he replies. "I think the nature of the conversation is going to be that they will tell me things that they are doing and maybe I'll have a reaction - I don't know what." He pauses. "I'm not going to come with a blueprint."

Kahneman might not offer Plan B on a plate, but he is a master of humility - something that might be of equal value to our politicians, if they could get their heads round the idea.

Sophie Elmhirst is features editor of the New Statesman

This article first appeared in the 28 November 2011 issue of the New Statesman, The rise of the muslim brotherhood

Show Hide image

SRSLY #13: Take Two

On the pop culture podcast this week, we discuss Michael Fassbender’s Macbeth, the recent BBC adaptations of Lady Chatterley’s Lover and Cider with Rosie, and reminisce about teen movie Shakespeare retelling She’s the Man.

This is SRSLY, the pop culture podcast from the New Statesman. Here, you can find links to all the things we talk about in the show as well as a bit more detail about who we are and where else you can find us online.

Listen to our new episode now:

...or subscribe in iTunes. We’re also on Audioboom, Stitcher, RSS and  SoundCloud – but if you use a podcast app that we’re not appearing in, let us know.

SRSLY is hosted by Caroline Crampton and Anna Leszkiewicz, the NS’s web editor and editorial assistant. We’re on Twitter as @c_crampton and @annaleszkie, where between us we post a heady mixture of Serious Journalism, excellent gifs and regularly ask questions J K Rowling needs to answer.

The podcast is also on Twitter @srslypod if you’d like to @ us with your appreciation. More info and previous episodes on

If you’d like to talk to us about the podcast or make a suggestion for something we should read or cover, you can email srslypod[at]

You can also find us on Twitter @srslypod, or send us your thoughts on tumblr here. If you like the podcast, we'd love you to leave a review on iTunes - this helps other people come across it.

The Links

On Macbeth

Ryan Gilbey’s review of Macbeth.

The trailer for the film.

The details about the 2005 Macbeth from the BBC’s Shakespeare Retold series.


On Lady Chatterley’s Lover and Cider with Rosie

Rachel Cooke’s review of Lady Chatterley’s Lover.

Sarah Hughes on Cider with Rosie, and the BBC’s attempt to create “heritage television for the Downton Abbey age”.


On She’s the Man (and other teen movie Shakespeare retellings)

The trailer for She’s the Man.

The 27 best moments from the film.

Bim Adewunmi’s great piece remembering 10 Things I Hate About You.


Next week:

Anna is reading Lolly Willowes by Sylvia Townsend Warner.


Your questions:

We loved talking about your recommendations and feedback this week. If you have thoughts you want to share on anything we've discussed, or questions you want to ask us, please email us on srslypod[at], or @ us on Twitter @srslypod, or get in touch via tumblr here. We also have Facebook now.



The music featured this week, in order of appearance, is:


Our theme music is “Guatemala - Panama March” (by Heftone Banjo Orchestra), licensed under Creative Commons. 



See you next week!

PS If you missed #12, check it out here.

Caroline Crampton is web editor of the New Statesman.

Anna Leszkiewicz is the New Statesman's editorial assistant.