Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin

By Timothy Snyder

By Timothy Snyder

When the Soviet Union invaded east Poland in 1939, many Poles and Jews panicked and fled to the Nazi-occupied west. Nothing, they thought, could be worse than Stalin. At one bridge an SS-officer watched this in disbelief. "Where on earth are you going?" he exclaimed."We are going to kill you."

It wasn't just Poland. Millions of east Europeans were trapped between Germany and the Soviet Union, the two most murderous regimes in European history. Their story is at the heart of Timothy Snyder's outstanding book. What he calls "the Bloodlands", that huge area stretching from the Baltic to the Black Sea, is "where Europe's most murderous regimes did their most murderous work".

For Snyder, this period of violence begins in 1933 not with Hitler's rise to power but with Stalin's decision to starve more than three million Ukrainians to death. Then came the killing of 700,000 Soviet citizens, shot during the Great Terror of 1937-38. At this point, the Soviet Union was "the only state in Europe carrying out policies of mass killing". Before 1939, the Nazi regime "killed no more than ten thousand people. The Stalinist regime had already starved millions and shot the better part of a million."

200,000 Polish citizens were shot by the Soviets or Germans at the beginning of the Second World War. When Germany invaded the Soviet Union in 1941 the atrocities escalated. Four million Soviet citizens were starved to death by the Germans, including three million Soviet prisoners of war. More than five million Jews were gassed or shot by the Germans. In total, Snyder concludes, in the middle of Europe in the middle of the 20th century, the Nazi and Soviet regimes murdered some 14 million people. This doesn't include soldiers killed on the Eastern Front. The Bloodlands were the site of the Nazi death camps, mass shootings by the NKVD and the Einsatzgruppen, campaigns of mass starvation by both the Soviet Union and the Nazis, and the scene of the worst fighting of the war. And it could have been worse. If the Nazis had won, tens of millions of Slavs would have been killed, creating a living space in the east for German colonist-farmers.

We think of the Germans as the main perpetrators. Snyder has none of this. The point is, he argues, that murdering was most intense in the countries which were occupied first by the Soviet Union, then by the Germans and then, again, by the Red Army. That dynamic is crucial. Ukrainians and Latvians welcomed Germans because they couldn't believe anything could be as bad as Stalin. Two inhuman utopian visions clashed and for those caught in between the result was catastrophe.

In addition to the mass killings, there were huge deportations. In Soviet Belarus about two million people were killed, but two million were also deported and a million more fled from the German invasion. "By the end of the war," writes Snyder, "half of the population of Belarus had either been killed or moved." Nor did it stop in 1945. Then came the ethnic cleansing and mass population movements of the post-war years. Snyder takes the story up to Stalin's death in 1953.

Bloodlands is well written, clear and accessible. The book is packed with up to date statistics -- many simply astonishing -- but there are also moving accounts of individuals. Stories like that of Jozef Sobolewski, a toddler, starved to death with his mother and five of his brothers and sisters in 1933 in the Ukraine. The one brother who survived was shot in 1937, in Stalin's Terror.

Some of this is familiar. A great deal, however, isn't. Snyder is a key figure in the new thinking about eastern Europe which is transforming the way we think about Stalinism, Nazism and the Holocaust. Any illusions you might have about the decency of the Wehrmacht or of Stalin's regime will not survive reading this book. We think of German concentration camps and the Gulag as the worst symbols of totalitarianism, but most of those who entered German concentration camps survived. 90 per cent of those who entered the Gulag left it alive. Most of the killings went on in pits, forests, death camps and "starvation zones", some gassed, most shot or starved, in east Europe and the west of the Soviet Union. Not, Snyder is emphatic here, in Russia. But in the non-Russian periphery of the Soviet Union, above all, the Ukraine, Belarus and formerly Soviet-occupied east Poland. Even Stalin's Great Terror was not concentrated in Russia. Of nearly 700,000 executions carried out for political crimes in 1937-38, few were poets or old Bolsheviks. More than 625,000 were kulaks or members of non-Russian minorities.

Snyder has pulled together a huge amount of new thinking and research, much of it not yet translated. It is a formidable work of scholarship, shattering many myths, and opening up a fascinating new history of Europe.

Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin

Timothy Synder

Bodley Head, 544pp, £25

 

3 comments

shoestrade05's picture

Best regards for you all,

Looking forward to your visiting.

http://www.1shopping.us/

Best regards for you all,

Looking forward to your visiting.

http://www.1shopping.us/

True Facts's picture

Please support this Action and Petition.

"The Kosciuszko Foundation (KF) has posted a petition, introduced by its Pres. Alex Storozynski, on its web site demanding that the media stop using historically erroneous terms “Polish concentration camps" and "Polish death camps" to describe Auschwitz and other Nazi extermination camps built by the Germans during World War II.”
"Recently, Polish American Congress (PAC) President Frank Spula and American Council for Polish Culture (ACPC) President Deborah Majka have individually informed Pres. Storozynski that they fully support the petition and are requesting their respective Divisions and Affiliates to follow suit".

Petition Details:
"The KF petition specifically requests that The Washington Post, and the Associated Press, include entries in their stylebooks requiring news stories to be historically accurate, using the official name of all “German concentration camps in Nazi-occupied Poland,” as UNESCO did in 2007 when it named the camp in Auschwitz, “The Auschwitz-Birkenau German Nazi Concentration and Extermination Camp (1940-1945).” A newspaper’s stylebook provides the instructions and guidelines, which editors and writers are expected to follow for articles to be published in that paper."
Please electronically sign this peitition by entering your name and town, state, & country.

To find the petition, go to the website "thekf.org", click events, then find the news section on the left and click "Petition on German Concentration Camps".

DAULAT RAM's picture

Ninety per cent of British Empire human deaths in World War Two were INDIANS who perished in the 1943 Bengal Famine costing three million lives after Churchill deliberately obstructed food aid - though India had two million soldiers in the War and had supplied enormous amounts of material and even (ironically) food to the UK during the War.

This has been detailed by a superb new history with exhaustive research in UK archives by the distinguished US journalist Madhusree Mukerjee. ("Churchill's Secret War: The British Empire and the Ravaging of India During World War Two", Basic Books, 2010.)

Here is an extract from the Time Magazine review of the Mukerjee book on the 1943 Bengal Famine and Churchill's role in it, "Churchill's Secret War":

"As Mukerjee’s accounts demonstrate, some of India’s grain was also exported to Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) to meet needs there, even though the island wasn’t experiencing the same hardship; Australian wheat sailed past Indian cities (where the bodies of those who had died of starvation littered the streets) to depots in the Mediterranean and the Balkans; and offers of American and Canadian food aid were turned down. India was not permitted to use its own sterling reserves, or indeed its own ships, to import food. And because the British government paid inflated prices in the open market to ensure supplies, grain became unaffordable for ordinary Indians. Lord Wavell, appointed Viceroy of India that fateful year, considered the Churchill government’s attitude to India “negligent, hostile and contemptuous.”

Mukerjee’s prose is all the more devastating because she refuses to voice the outrage most readers will feel on reading her exhaustively researched, footnoted facts. The way in which Britain’s wartime financial arrangements and requisitioning of Indian supplies laid the ground for famine; the exchanges between the essentially decent Amery and the bumptious Churchill; the racism of Churchill’s odious aide, paymaster general Lord Cherwell, who denied India famine relief and recommended most of the logistical decisions that were to cost so many lives — all are described in a compelling narrative.

Churchill said that history would judge him kindly because he intended to write it himself. The self-serving but elegant volumes he authored on the war led the Nobel Committee, unable in all conscience to bestow him an award for peace, to give him, astonishingly, the Nobel Prize for Literature — an unwitting tribute to the fictional qualities inherent in Churchill’s self-justifying embellishments. Mukerjee’s book depicts a truth more awful than any fiction."

I wonder what Snyder would make of this dethroning of Churchill? Given his puffery about the Russians having suffered less in the War than Ukrainians, Poles etc and are theerfore less entitled to the glory?

What about BRITISH glory in World War Two now

And by the way, 25 million is a CONSERVATIVE estimate of the Nineteenth Century victims of the almost 5 times a decade famines that started to sweep India after British rule began. Indian life expectancy in the 1920s was 24 years. The literacy rate at Independence was LOWER than when British rule began. All this and the Churchill Famine of 1943.

The comparison with the Nazis is pretty appropriate. When Churchill was asked for famine relief for India - caused by supplying much more food than India could afford - his response was only the sneer: "Why isn't Gandhi dead yet?" A sneer worthy of Himmler.
"Who remembers the Armenians?", sneered Hitler.

"Who will remember what I am doing to the Bengalis?", could have sneered Churchill.

But his luck has run out. Serious historians have found out the grim facts behind his legend. The fat pink glutton will not swagger through the history books so care-free ever again. Three million skeletons have fallen out of his cupboard.

Latest tweets