Return to: Home | Culture | Books

The Provos' big mistake

Gary Kent

Published 11 December 2008

Gunsmoke and Mirrors: How Sinn Fein Dressed Up Defeat as Victory Henry McDonald Gill & Macmillan, 256pp, £16.99

Sending the message to the wrong address: the fallout from an IRA car bomb in Connaught Street, central London, 1975

The Provos' big mistake

This is the tale of two IRAs, the Officials and the Provisionals, which split in 1969 over whether to reform or destroy Northern Ireland. The Officials renounced violence and their political wing embarked on a journey on which its most gifted parliamentarians became leaders of the Irish Labour Party. However, the Provisionals prevailed in the early 1970s even as the peaceful civil rights movement emerged successfully to tackle discrimination. They became "the most well-armed and sophisticated paramilitary force in the western world", according to this veteran Ireland correspondent's book.

The supreme irony is that the Provisionals' belief in sickening the UK into abandoning Northern Irish Protestants has substantially or perhaps permanently deferred Irish unity. "A charade of gunsmoke and mirrors" has subsequently covered a retreat from their early revolutionary rhetoric as Sinn Fein plays catch-up with the Officials and the Social Democratic and Labour Party.

This fast-paced and passionate (but occasionally sloppy) polemic is a scathing indictment of republican illusions and brutality, without neglecting loyalist and state actions, in a conflict that claimed thousands of lives and cost billions. Henry McDonald argues that the Provos spent years sending violent messages to "the wrong address" - to the UK Establishment rather than the local Protestants. They were long dismissed as imperialist stooges but are now being "love-bombed" by Sinn Fein, which requires some of them to amass a majority for unification.

Republicans failed to cajole the UK into withdrawing and being a persuader for unification. Instead, London built solid relations with the Irish government and insisted that Irish unity required consent rather than coercion. In the 1990s, republicans gradually dumped the ballot box and Armalite for an unarmed strategy to advance a unitary Ireland through an alliance of UK sympathisers, nationalist Ireland in the 26 counties, and American supporters.

However, these hopes evaporated and Irish unity seems unlikely by 2016 - the centenary of the Easter Rising. Partition is an increasing fact of life in the Republic, where Sinn Fein is more isolated because it is seen as irrelevant to domestic issues. Hostility there has also been fuelled by several high-profile, bitterly contested and so far unresolved murders.

The United States became less sympathetic after the 11 September 2001 attacks, and even before that the IRA's dalliance with Farc narcoterrorists in Colombia infuriated the Bush administration, which rounded on Gerry Adams. The senior US diplomat Richard Haass told him: "If any American, service personnel or civilian, is killed in Colombia by the technology the IRA supplied then you can fuck off. Don't tell me you know nothing about what's going on there, we know everything about it."

When one factors in heavy infiltration of the IRA by British agents and the possibly connected elimination of militaristic elements, it is not surprising that a movement which promised to smash Stormont and never decommission reversed both commitments at the end of "one of the most futile mini-wars of the last century".

Where now? There is much talk of some sort of truth recovery process. However, in my view, Northern Ireland is too small, the events are too fresh and politicians have no interest in coming clean and possibly losing votes. Yet those who died and suffered deserve justice.

McDonald concedes that Sinn Fein ministers are "among the most personally amenable and human in their handling of the press and the public". This counts for something, but new politics and generational change in parties that sustained violence are also needed.

The critical change which came with the Good Friday Agreement is that most political forces are now trying to overcome the legacy of accumulated bitterness within Northern Ireland rather than obsessing about the border, which is what republicans split over in 1969. For example, Sinn Fein, Conservatives and others on the British-Irish Parliamentary Assembly are seeking to transform the sprawling army base at Omagh into an educational village where Catholic and Protestant schools will share facilities.

Increasing integrated education, which covers just 6 per cent of pupils, will be important in undermining the sectarianism of a deeply segregated society. A "peace wall" was recently erected in one integrated school's playground but a wider benign apartheid allows Protestants and Catholics still to live separate lives. The creation of a smart civil society and a sound economy, which spends less on duplicating expenditure along sectarian lines, would bolster a stable Northern Ireland with full equality and substantial north-south co-operation, or even Irish unity.

McDonald's many insights add to the burgeoning literature on the rise and fall of the Troubles and the future of Northern Ireland. Peace is better anchored there but still bitter and fragile. This book analyses key aspects of the long journey, but there is much further to travel.

Gary Kent has written about Irish affairs since the 1980s

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

rutherford
11 December 2008 at 23:43

"or even Irish unity."

Whoa. In the context of peace between the communities in Northern Ireland, Irish 'unity' is an irrelevance. Never mind the Northern unionist, what binds together a Southerner and a Northern nationalist 80 years after the fall of the first failed united state?

You may have written about Irish affairs since the 80s, and maybe that's where you went wrong: the two states are on very very different wavelengths.

MaterialMonkee
13 December 2008 at 20:33

In my humble opinion which of course I'll share

The Tories made the IRA irrelevant by joining the European coal and steel community.

I totally the support the concept of the EU and am no euro-sceptic but lets face it the power is in Brussels.

There's no point in trying to liberate Belfast from London when it's run by Brussels anyway.

Same goes for the murdering f@ckwits in the Basque country. What they gonna get? Another state run by Brussels.

San Francisco can declare it's self independent from California but what will they get ?

Jack sh!t It'll still be run by Washington.

If they want independence from the EU then good luck, but what would that actually gain?

Dr_Paul
14 December 2008 at 12:48

The strangest thing about Ireland is that both the British state and Sinn Féin share the same objective.

The Six Counties are of no earthly use to Britain; sensible members of the British state recognise this, and would like to dump them. Problem: the South doesn't want them -- and who can blame Dublin for thinking that? Whitehall hopes that some sort of joint sovereignty between Dublin and London over the Six Counties will be lashed up, within the structures of the European Union.

SF have concluded that eventually, hopefully, Irish reunification will take place, in the meantime joint sovereignty will be a stepping-stone to it. SF will at some point accept the dual sovereignty as the best available deal.

SF is the only major force in Ireland as a whole wanting to change the forms of sovereignty; there is therefore a community of interests between Whitehall and SF. Both are marching along the same track.

How many years and how many lives has it taken for the British state and Sinn Féin to recognise that at root they share the same interests?

Morgenschein
17 December 2008 at 11:59

People on the island of Ireland are parochial. They don't want to know much about life in the next large town, much less the next county. I dare say that similar attitudes exist in Great Britain, where home counties residents don't give a toss about the affairs of Geordies or Mancunians; and as for Wales, there be dragons and cheap seaside holidays in those cluttered caravan sites.

More is the pity: it inhibits inter-regional solidarity. In the Irish context it inhibits mutual understanding and cross community co-operation on various levels. The embittered long-suffering people of Northern Ireland need five long years of cross-community government to prove that normal governance is possible. The unity of Ireland can await the will of heaven.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker