Registered user login:

There’s no alternative

Tristan Quinn

Published 13 March 2008

Suckers: How Alternative Medicine Makes Fools of Us All
Rose Shapiro Harvill Secker, 296pp, £12.99

From acupuncture to zero balancing, via homoeopathy and urine therapy, this provocative book is a fierce attack on the “epidemic” of alternative medicine, now used by one in three of us. The author, a “fact-favouring sceptic”, argues that this huge business is duping us, because there is no evidence that alternative medicine works, and it sometimes puts health at risk.

Shapiro argues that cancer brings together “the most duplicitous and dangerous manifestations” of the alternative medicine culture. She is stinging about the alternative medicine promoters who accuse doctors, researchers and drug companies (“the cancer industry”) of suppressing “natural treatments” and even a cure itself, to retain power and protect profits.

Shapiro is outraged that alternative medicine is becoming increasingly available through the National Health Service, and cites a London hospital where spiritual healers work with leukaemia patients. She argues that the NHS is wasting money and “encouraging the public appetite for yet more worthless therapies”. Although careful not to criticise those who use alternative medicine, she is perhaps overly optimistic that they will respond to her call to be more critical of its claims.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

1 comment from readers

Selina, Dover
13 March 2008 at 15:56

It has become rather fashionable, I know, to criticize 'alternative therapies'. Besides, the society and economic structure we live in does not lend itself to modes of healing which recognize the individuality of the whole person. Friends and relatives working in, as well as using, conventional medicine cannot help but complain of its increasing 'conveyor belt' mentality, often including multiple presccriptions, the various interactions of which surely must be unpredictable & sometimes risky?

I knew nothing of the alternatives when, 15 years ago, I fell ill with a disabling disease and all my GP had to offer me was sympathy & a wheelchair.

I was a single mum at the time & simply had to get back to work. It was a homeopath who cured me. The cost? £70 for 2 consultations. I promptly returned to my full-time job and years later retrained as a homeopath. The training is arduous and the assessment rigorous. What do we spend 4-5 years studying? The evidence - 200 years of clinical 'provings' and case studies. I am now in the privileged position of helping others to regain health in the way that I was helped.

I charge £50 per consultation, including medicines and offer a course of treatment of 2-3 consultations. I haven't been practising for long but I have had no complaints to date about the service I offer or the cost.

It is a nonsense to suggest that the medical decisions should be based on one type of evidence only - observation of the patient is and has always been valued by medical practitioners.

I returned to my GP after I was cured and he observed that, whereas previously I had difficulty walking and my health was deteriorating, I was now, in a very short space of time, very well. Naturally he was interested, as would any intelligent observer be - not contemptuous.

One cannot help feeling that there is vested interest behind this sort of publication due to the absolute lack of real intellectual curiosity given to the subject. After all, we are not talking about UFOs, we are talking about patients who are verifiably cured following a particular mode of treatment.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?