Registered user login:

Cash and glory

Carolyn O'Hara

Published 23 August 2007

Blackwater: the Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army
Jeremy Scahill Serpent's Tail, 452pp, £12.99

It was an arresting image, savage and iconic: two mutilated and charred bodies dangling on bridge beams over the Euphrates, jubilant Iraqis cheering in the foreground. On the last day of March 2004, a mob in Fallujah ambushed two unarmoured SUVs carrying four American contractors. Bullets tore through the vehicles and the dead Americans were pulled from the cars and set on fire. As the crowd swelled, the bodies were hacked apart with shovels and stomped with the soles of shoes. The remains were then dragged to a nearby bridge, where they hung for the next ten hours.

The photograph of the desecrated corpses quickly spread around the globe, invoking the scene in Mogadishu a decade earlier, when 18 US army rangers were killed and their bodies dragged through the streets of the Somali capital. This time, however, the men in Fallujah weren't members of an elite American force, at least not technically. They worked for Blackwater, one of more than 180 private military companies operating in Iraq. If Americans - and the rest of the world - were haunted and horrified that day by the fate of these men, they were also just beginning to realise that this was a very different kind of war. Forget for a moment the false pretences and reckless strategies that have marred the Iraq War from the beginning. What makes Iraq different is that it is a privatised war - the most privatised war in American history.

At least 125,000 private contractors - and perhaps as many as 180,000 (the US defence department jealously guards the figure) - work in Iraq alongside US soldiers. They are translators, truck drivers, cooks and, yes, private soldiers protecting ambassadors, convoys and government installations. Estimates of the number of security contractors emerge infrequently; a US government report last year suggested there were 48,000 private soldiers in Iraq. They hail from dozens of nations, and they risk their lives to make princely sums. A security contractor with elite training can earn as much as $1,500 (£750) a day, a great deal more than the enlisted soldiers he works alongside. Former Green Berets and British SAS lead contingents of Serbians, Chileans and South Africans, some with questionable human rights records back home.

Blackwater employs just 1,000 contractors in Iraq, but the company has acquired a certain fascination among war-watchers because of its management's deep ties to the Republican Party and its high-profile assignments, such as providing the former American proconsul in Baghdad, Paul Bremer's, personal security detail in the city. Indeed, Blackwater has become totemic among the anti-war left, representing all that is nefarious and misguided about the Iraq enterprise, a reputation that wasn't helped when heavily armed Blackwater contractors arrived in New Orleans days after Katrina to protect stately Garden District homes from looting, all before the huddled masses in the Superdome were evacuated.

It is a reputation that Jeremy Scahill, an investigative reporter for the liberal weekly the Nation, hardly questions. His profile of Blackwater is a mechanical and repetitive condemnation of security privatisation that borders on the paranoid. It's a disappointment, particularly because this is a topic that demands further investigation. In his zeal to establish a kind of Christian fundamentalist agenda at the root of the firm's success, and even to conflate Shia death squads and Sunni insurgents with modern-day, pro-occupation contractors operating in Iraq, Scahill fails to examine in any constructive way what corporate warriors will mean to the future of warfare - and of peace.

In setting his sights on Blackwater, Scahill also misses the opportunity to scrutinise private security firms that not only have far larger forces and investments in Iraq, but also have the most notorious histories. Take Tim Spicer's Aegis Defence Services, which was awarded a $300m contract in 2004 to co-ordinate security for all Iraqi reconstruction projects. Or consider the London-based ArmorGroup International, which protects a third of all non-military convoys in Iraq. To call Blackwater "the world's most powerful mercenary army" is simply misleading and seriously exaggerates the company's scope and capabilities. As a result, Scahill misses an opportunity to provide a more useful and ultimately more significant portrait of the $100bn private security industry.

But Scahill deserves commendation for at least scratching the surface of the business and the implications of its growing presence. Towards the end of the book, he considers all too briefly the possibility of private military firms morphing into peacekeeping forces, before concluding, as he makes clear from the outset, that he'd prefer these dogs of war to hang up their guns. What he doesn't share is how he'd get them back in their kennels.

Carolyn O'Hara is assistant editor of Foreign Policy magazine in Washington, DC

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

2 comments from readers

Carl Jones
24 August 2007 at 18:33

Lets be clear, the four mercenaries killed in Falluja were assassins...so shocked were the Americans that they despatched Mr Kimmits and a posse of tanks to obliterate Falluja, but when Kimmits arrived his tanks were out of fuel, but he still issued a demand by PA that all women and children leave the city...this in its self was a war crime and even Blair was shocked.

A British aid worker told the Guardian that US snipers were shooting women and children who were trying to get into the hospital. Kimmits was so frustrated that he ordered in helicopter gunships which fired on the civilian population, even those who attempted to cross the river were picked off by US snipers. Eventually Kimmits called in two C130 gunships (google and find out how nasty they are).

There is also evidence that Amerika used a small nuclear weapon on the city and new microwave weapons...this being an off-shoot of Scalar weapons which can manipulate continental weather.

The last numbers which I saw on US mercenaries was about 30,000 in Iraq. Some suggest this now much higher. Its claimed these hired guns are there for protection. I suspect that a good few 1000 of these are ex-US/UK/Aus/Isreali special forces and that they are doing all the nasty jobs which can`t be given to regular military forces.

These hired guns are above "all law", they are not even under US military command. It is likely that they are operating under the orders of Mr Cheney .

I believe that it is these forces in conjunction with CIA run war lords which provided the first post invasion attacks which has fueled the civil war. There has also been a programme of kidnaping and assassination on all possible future threats to the Iraq puppet government.

Even the SAS Basra incident which was covered up by the BBC, was an act of Western organised terror on Iraqi`s. This wasn`t the only incident involving SAS forces fighting Iraqi police. In Baghadad two US military dressed as Arabs (SAS in Basra) were captured parking a car bomb in a Baghdad street...the US military arrived in force rescuing them.

The only thing the British army are good for is peace keeping and mercenary target practice.

The whole shabbang has been organised from start to finish. As this weeks lead article states, Bush takes a lot of holiday....he has nothing to worry about. Its only an issue for the public, because media are feeding them a pack of lies.

gnuneo
26 August 2007 at 16:57

carl jones: apart from your comments about the use of a TacNuke (i would consider it more likely that any radioactive elements came from the use of DU shells, whose use should be regarded as a WMD and a war-crime), i would say you've pretty much hit the nail on the head.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Also by Carolyn O'Hara

Read More

Vote!

Is this the worst economic situation for 60 years?