Return to: Home | Culture | Books

Paperbacks to go

John Sutherland

Published 07 May 2007

John Sutherland on the books for sale in cinemas, cafés and designer boutiques

In 1935, two young publishers, one American, one English, hit on the same brilliant idea. Why not sell next-to-new books, in soft covers, at near-giveaway prices, and call them “paperbacks”?

Allen Lane came up with Penguins, at 6d (2.5p) a go. Robert de Graff came up with Pocket Books, at a quarter. But great minds did not think quite alike. Penguins were paperbacks that sold like hardbacks, alongside their expensive shop-mates. De Graff, by contrast, sought new, non-book outlets: news-stands, drugstores, department stores. Whereas Penguin went chastely typographic in its covers, Pocket Books screamed for attention, with lurid pictorial come-ons. They needed to draw attention to themselves: customers were in the vicinity for reasons other than books.

It is still the case in America that books will be found in parts they don’t reach in the UK. In the past couple of weeks, I have bought Russian Prison Tattoos by Alix Lambert from Marc Jacobs, on Melrose Avenue in downtown Los Angeles (about as far away from the Putin Gulags as Mars).

I bought a volume of Nan Goldin’s photographs from the Arclight Cinema on Sunset and Vine. In Kinko’s, round the corner, I was less tempted by a rack of “Xerox yourself to millionairedom” business books (snuggled alongside them were the ubiquitous Da Vinci Code).

Historically, there is no advance in bookselling that has not been either pioneered or perfected

in the American marketplace – from “extras” in the 1840s (newsprint novels, distributed with papers), through the Book of the Month Club in the 1920s, to Jeff Bezos’s web store in the 1980s.

My local Starbucks in Pasadena (unlike my local Starbucks in Camden) has the inevitable bookstand. As is usual in this particular outlet, it currently features just the one title: A Long Way Gone by Ishmael Beah. As the capsule description in the New York Times chart puts it: “A former child soldier from Sierra Leone describes his drug-crazed killing spree and his return to humanity.”

It’s well chosen. Starbucks patrons are deeply conflicted about Africa and their beloved bean. Drinkers know that their double short latte is quite likely sweated out of exploited labour

in Kenya, Uganda or even, God help them, Sierra Leone. Beah takes away a nasty aftertaste.

A Long Way Gone subliminally connects with another title riding high in the charts: Barack Obama’s The Audacity of Hope. It’s a rather dry treatise. But as Obama has confessed, he, too, came back from a youth which, if not exactly “drug crazed”, certainly involved inhaling and even snorting.

The queues are so long in Starbucks nowadays that one could plausibly get through a hardback before getting one’s order in. But from the trade point of view, Britain – currently gloomy about its disappearing “independent” bookshops – could draw some inspiration from de Graff and his legacy. Find new outlets. Caffè Nero might be a good place to start.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

1 comment from readers

Oliver_Warren
08 May 2007 at 09:24

This article puzzled me. I had understood that it was precisely the entry into the book-selling market of 'new outlets' owned by companies who don't make their money from selling books (supermarkets being the obvious example, coffee chains presumably another) that was sending smaller bookshops out of business and reducing publishers' freedom to take risks and publish anything other than guaranteed bestsellers ('the ubiquitous da Vinci Code').

Allen Lane, by contrast, brought literature of a proven quality (which isn't necessarily the same as popularity) to a wider audience who, as a result, experienced a sudden expansion in the range of available reading.

Are the two really comparable?

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker