Return to: Home | Culture | Books

Average white band

Lynsey Hanley

Published 05 March 2007

Welcome to Everytown Julian Baggini Granta, 274pp, £14.99 ISBN 1862079218

Being English is a wonder and a pain, not least because the collective philosophy is rooted in collectivism. The wondrous side of our soul-deep socialism is the way we treat the NHS - or perhaps that should be "have treated" - as a secular religion; the painful side is our unspoken adherence to the idea that "the nail that sticks out must be hammered down", a philosophy attributed to the Japanese, but which could equally apply to us.

You can say all you like about the Thatcher-sponsored rise of rugged individualism, suggests Julian Baggini in his latest book, but the English remain conformist to the core. We feel stronger as a collective, with shared values and a philosophy that Baggini classifies as "conservative communitarianism". Having long suspected how atypical his lifestyle and neighbourhood - a boho corner of Bristol full of delis and organic stores - was compared to the rest of the country, he decided that the only way to test his hy pothesis was to spend six months living the most average English life possible.

He did this by moving to S66, a Rotherham suburb pinpointed by statisticians as the place where English averages of income, home ownership and car ownership converge. After a few false starts, he finds a very average-looking "Barratt box" to rent privately (few areas of the country have large concentrations of privately rented housing), and settles down to enjoy, if only temporarily, the ways of the average Englishman.

While wearing my metropolitan, liberal-lefty, yogurt-knitting goggles, as Baggini does initially, it all looks pretty awful. Being average, he finds, involves watching huge amounts of telly, going on Mallorcan package tours, eating ready meals for tea, using racist language casually, complaining endlessly about taxes and foreigners, drinking WKD-lager shandies and making gentle, if pointed, digs about experiences or views that are anything more than "a little different".

This kind of cultural conservatism, which lends itself to preserving many aspects of working-class life as it has been lived for generations, manifests itself in a depressingly narrow definition of what tastes and experiences are acceptable. You have to be sufficiently similar to everyone else in order not to be regarded as a black sheep or, worse, someone who clearly does not respect the views of the majority.

I remember a couple of years ago being given the chance to spin a few records at a family party in my dad's local social club on a council estate in Birmingham. In selecting only singles that had reached the top ten, I hoped my playlist would appeal to most of the audience. The evil looks and empty dance floor that greeted Franz Ferdinand's top-five hit "Do You Want To" proved how wrong I was. In picking an indie guitar band, no matter how popular, over Westlife's insipid balladry, I'd revealed my taste in music, and by extension my very self, to be unacceptably different to that of everyone else in the room.

There's no better place for Baggini to prove how game he is than in his (temporary) local pub. He corrals a small group of drinking buddies and - without much prodding, I'd wager - solicits their opinion on the hot topics of the day: the London Tube bombings, immigration, the price of owning a car. That he doesn't either punch them or flounce out in a huff, as I would have done, the minute one of them uttered the word "Paki" is a testament not only to his strong stomach, but also to his willingness to accept that, in S66, he and his urbane outlook are in a minority of one. He is right to challenge their views because they are racist and narrow-minded, but not to dismiss them out of hand on the basis that the average man is a thicko who doesn't know any better.

"The most racist person I met in S66 was in some ways frighteningly close in his opinions to those of the majority," he writes, adding: "The unwillingness to see the mainstream way of life changed too radically clearly fits in with the traditional working-class culture which values continuity, community, stability and a sense of belonging." Baggini respects, without grudge, the desire of the majority not to have their values threatened, as it has some upsides.

The downside, however, is the rejection, whether subtle or forceful, of anyone who doesn't see things their way. Baggini, in this generous, clever and thoughtful book, suggests that England's liberal minority does exactly the same thing without realising it. Each side rejects the other, with no room for understanding: where's the self-awareness, the so-called English talent for tolerance?

Unicef's report on the well-being of the world's young has revealed that only 40 per cent of British children regard their peers as being "kind and helpful". Think of the values of the adults they are learning from.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

Philosovich
05 March 2007 at 11:31

Nice review. I think I'll pick up this book.

patelaainen
10 March 2007 at 17:57

I'm undecided about the very idea of this book. I grew up in S66 and it's difficult to see the culture of your youth held up for the world to see its foibles. Saying that, I don't know that I would have liked to grow up in a liberal, cosmopolitan area: as Baggini points out, cultural snobbery is just as bad the other way. I think that the difference is those who live in leafy cosmopolitan areas think that everyone else wants a piece of what they have; in Wickersley we would not dare to make such assumptions. Saying that, I coudn't wait to leave S66, and still come out in a cold sweat when I see a Barratt estate where it always feels like it's Sunday.

patelaainen
10 March 2007 at 18:06

Btw: the views that Baggini has come across are ones that I rarely heard in 19 years: obviously in certain areas unpleasant and ignorant values prevail, but I was unpleasantly shocked to find that Baggini had found this to be one such area. The people he met, certainly the ones mentioned in this excerpt, do not by any means represent the views of the people I knew in S66.

steve moxon
15 January 2008 at 23:22

What a compete bigot the reviewer is, completely misrepresenting what Baggini wrote. Baggini explains at length that when locals use the term 'Paki' they are not being in any ay racist. They use it just as they would the term 'Aussie' for Australians.

I come from and live in a Sheffield postcode and I can confirm that Baggini is right, and the reviewer here is fully hefted to the narrow-minded Liberal left that have got it so very wrong, and will soon be severely regretting their extreme bigotry.

Steve Moxon

stevemoxon3@talktalk.net

S10 1BJ

0114 26317145

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Also by Lynsey Hanley

Read More

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker