Voices

Views from elsewhere

Syndicate contentRSS

An honour killing with a difference

A Turkish woman takes the law into her own hands and kills the man who raped her.

Nevin Yildirim in custody. Image: a still from a news report by CNN.
Nevin Yildirim in custody. Image: a still from a news report by CNN.

The name of Nevin Yildirim was unknown in Turkey a few weeks ago. Then she took a gun to the man who had raped her, often at gunpoint, since the beginning of the year. She shot him repeatedly, stabbed him, chopped off his head, and took it in a sack to throw at the feet of the men in a café who had called her a whore. A woman from the provincial town of Yalvaç, Yildirim is pregnant with the child of her rapist, and now finds herself at the centre of a debate about women’s rights in Turkey.

It’s difficult not to be somehow impressed. Yildirim handed herself in at the police station with a statement that her honour had been restored, and liberal bloodlust will be satisfied to see a victim gain her vengeance. In a country where women are often silent victims of rape, honour killings, and suicide prompted by repressive families and communities, the story offers a break from disempowerment.

Yildirim has quickly become a heroine to women’s rights groups in Turkey. Public opinion is pressing for her to be given the abortion she was denied at 14 weeks, four weeks after the law makes abortion in Turkey illegal. Some feel Yildirim should be pardoned altogether, and the sentiment becomes less surprising the more you read about the abuse she suffered. One thing western audiences might not immediately expect is that millions of Turkish men will concur with these demands. Honour and courage are strong currency in Turkey, and as the overwhelming majority of Turkish men are not rapists, it’s not surprising they wholeheartedly approve of a woman taking the law into her own hands in dealing with one.

And yet there’s a dark irony here, because it’s also in the name of honour that Turkish women generally suffer most, and a country governed by honour has led us a situation in which patchy statistics of this secretive crime suggest a woman a day is killed in Turkey in the name of this very thing. The reason Nevin Yildirim had to kill her rapist is because her community and the police were either skeptical or silent in the face of the abuse she suffered. The thing that will best protect Turkish women is the rule of law, and the rule of law cannot work when people are celebrated and pardoned for taking it into their own hands.

From beginning to end, Yildirim’s story is a tragedy, and even with catharsis in the conclusion, it’s still a tragedy. Yildirim must be punished for her crime just as she punished her attacker for his; her sentence should make allowances for the provocation and self-defence that forced her actions, but still she should not be pardoned. To legitimise a brutal killing because it is carried out by a woman upon her attacker somehow supports the idea of women as a weaker sex, as if there is something charming about the woman who was able to turn the tide on the violence. Most abused women will never be able to do what Yildirim has done, and their misery will be compounded by expectations that women can protect themselves if only they have the courage to do so. Already there is talk of arming women to protect them from honour killings, the idea reveals Turkey's politicians in their embarrassing failure to grasp that people are better protected by rights and respect than firearms.

Meanwhile the Yildirim case allows the western media to go through its favourite motions. One report made direct reference to a Tarantino film, all focus on the decapitation and the blood. The Muslim world is too often guilty of these crimes and their fallout, while western journalists are ever on-hand to document them with all the sensitivity of a freak show.

16 comments

Pavlova's picture

It is a human right to defend oneself.

If the authorities do not do it, then we have the right to do it ourselves. If she killed him in self-defence then there's no crime. If she killed him in revenge then there is, but her state of mind has to be considered a strongly mitigating factor.

The same goes in this country. Women and disabled people and the elderly should be allowed to carry suitable weapons to make themselves safe in public.

D. Menscher's picture

Dreadful as it is, this kind of treatment is merely one facet of the medieval mindset which quietly holds sway in Turkey. Somewhere in Brussels, the clock is ticking down to the date on which this barbarism is granted the right to plant itself wherever it pleases in Europe.

Happy days.

AAMVN's picture

Very hard to argue with the 'natural justice' of this case. It will be interesting to see how it turns out. I've never been the victim of any serious crime so can't say how I'd react in a situation like hers. Very easy to adhere to the principle that 'we shouldn't take the law into our own hands' when you are not a victim that the law will not protect.

andyg's picture

N.B: Who represents the voice of the unborn innocent child. Isn't it a terrible endictment upon Humanity as a whole that the only good thing that can be said of this child's life, is the manner in which it was killed?
Where is justice at this point?

jankaas's picture

she had no choice, that much is clear. she was pushed to beyond what any human being, male or female, should ever have to endure. she acted purely in self defence. she most certainly did not take the law into her own hands, she was being attacked repeatedly, violently, with absolutely no end in sight.

the male victim gave up his own rights as a human being by his repeated inhuman behaviour.

andyg's picture

And how do you know all this Jankaas?

jankaas's picture

told you before Andyg, you're a total waste of my time. go away.

andyg's picture

Ahh for the art of discussion and debate. You've written it Jank ass but never said it given our geogriphical difference. It's what a man knows about himself inside that truely makes him name call for he has few words in which to discuss serious debate. In his world he's aware that serious debate has nothing to do with fair play because he's learnt that it's bound up with hatred, boastfulness, jealousy and the disregard of all known rules in witnessing psychological sadistic inner pleasures. That belief in a short decisive war is one of the most dangerous and ancient of Human illusions wouldn't you write Jank ass.
I contine to read that Cockoo loud and long, who thinks two words make up the song. You see Jank ass, the truth is often complex and seldom simple. The intimate history of any event, which is necessary to provide a fuller but more complex picture are rarely provided; because they are rarely pressed through in depth and detail for which truth is required; to the difficult and complex but necessary social connections which they index. I do so understand Jank ass that it takes wisdom to understand widom and that you constantly show the readers of these pages that you are not the sharpest pencil in the box and that you fail to grasp the reality that society can only exist where individuals are in relationships with each other; but even then socity can not exist without a positive system of communication.
Hope your well Jank ass. I await your next shot dear boy.
Angela. xxx

jankaas's picture

told you before Andyg, you're a total waste of my time. go away.

andyg's picture

I may waste your time because it is you that proclaims to be the expert on such ethical issues.........remember?
So where are we? Ah yes, so far you've given us your undivided opinion on an ethical issue of which you now imply that you know nothing about.
So, what will you do with the innocent child Junk ass?

andyg's picture

Any harm or suffering that is inflicted upon another Human being
Is harm and suffering that is inflicted upon me.
For I am a member of that Human race.
So send out not to see for whom that bell tolls,
For that bell
It does toll
for thee.

The Turkish people should hang their heads in shame, especially those within the Turkish judicial system. If these understandable honour killings are being carried out today then the judicial system has failed since time began to protect its own people.
As far as I am aware Turkey has signed the Universl declaration of Human rights.If so then Nevin Yildirim has been failed by Humanity as a whole.
My thoughts are with Nevin and those that endre the suffering that she has had to endure.

Chanakya's picture

Currently mad Muslim mobs are busy burning down American,German & British Embassies in the Muslim world over s silly film made in America by some obscure Christian nutter.Shouldn't these idiots concentrate, instead, on stopping the killings & rapes of their oppressed women? The Muslim men refuse to be civilised & humane.

Fazal ur Rahman's picture

Re Nevin Yildirim: We all should suffer with this and numerous other woman and children , for the abuse she and others suffer because of uncaring neglect by the polity, and unthinking societal prejudices and ignorance that makes these tragedies possible. Only then would we find the empathy that would choke off such behaviour, otherwise such crimes against the weak will continue.
I can neither applaud, nor codemn this horribly wronged woman.
There but for the Grace of God go I.
May she have peace and tranquility. Amen!

RFM's picture

You almost appear to perpetuate the notion that law is about justice, when clearly that notion is an illusion obscuring the fact that law is about protecting the interests of those with the power to make or influence laws. You describe the failure of the Turkish legal system to protect a woman (and women in general) from a minority of Turkish men who abuse them. If Turkish law cannot protect women from a minority of abusive men, then the legal system clearly does not function well with regards to women, and the concept of applying the law as means for social justice is again undermined. At this point, then to say that Yildirim should be made to answer for her crime as that is what justice demands, is to set up an entirely arbitrary point at which the law should be made to function.

The idea that justice needs to be served at this point in order for justice to prevail is farcical, justice should have been served on her attacker, or would that too have been an arbitrary point from which to apply the law? The problem with saying that, for justice to be served, it must be served from a particular point onwards while ignoring injustice prior to that point is useless, as justice was already undermined prior to the point at which you now insist justice must be recognised. Can you, in all honesty, really claim that justice will suffer more if you allow this woman to go as unpunished for her crime as her attacker was? Why can you not, arbitrarily, apply the law from the point after she was pardoned?

If justice can be rescued by applying the law to her after it failed to be applied to her attacker, does that mean that justice cannot be rescued by applying it to the case after hers?

You may object that you can carry on pushing the arbitrary point back further and further, which is of course true, but at this particular point, you wish to punish a woman for doing what nobody else would do for her, to protect her. You can issue a warning from this point saying that nobody will ever be pardoned for taking the law into their own hands again, but you should also do so on the understanding that society will then expect you do ensure nobody ever has to protect themselves against an abusive man aided by a failure of law.

As such, I strongly disagree with your argument that this woman should be punished.

andyg's picture

RFM, those who know only one side of a story can know very little of that. On the basis of what I read above my full sympathy is with 'the victim'. But I'm also aware that I only have half of a story, the other half is from someone who was shot and beheaded. For justice to be served then both sides of the story require telling and then the jury decide upon all the facts that are available at the time.
The only witness so far is someone who refered to the woman as a "whore". Why? Was this witness aware that the woman was being raped? Is that why he refered to her in such a way? Or, is there more to be told?
The Turkish men who I know have a very strong sense of what is just and proper, they would not include rape in this line of thinking. et us decide upon the facts and not half of a story.

Newmaria's picture

So very well said .

Latest tweets