Return to: Home | Blogs | The Staggers

TheStaggers

The Staggers: Expenses Scandal

The New Statesman rolling blog

Expenses MP Jim Devine’s car-crash interview

When the Labour MP Jim Devine defended fraud as “moving money around”.

On the day that the former Labour MP Jim Devine was found guilty on two counts of false accounting, here is the car-crash interview in which he hilariously attempted to justify fraud as "moving money around".

In the interview, with Channel 4 News's Krishnan Guru-Murthy, a tired and emotional Devine admitted submitting false invoices for stationery in order to pay his ... read more

Tags: Expenses Scandal

2 comments

Expenses peer still can't resign

Tory peer charged over his expenses can't leave the Lords.

We were expecting at least three parliamentarians to be charged over their expenses this morning and in the event four have been. Three Labour MPs -- David Chaytor, Jim Devine, Elliot Morley -- and the Tory peer Lord Hanningfield have been charged with false accounting.

Chaytor, Devine and Morley were all banned from seeking re-election by Labour's "star chamber". Hanningfield has resigned his position as a frontbench business spokesman in ... read more

Tags: Expenses Scandal

3 comments

Clegg's bold expenses intervention

Will his call for the inquiry to be widened succeed?

Nick Clegg's intervention in today's Daily Telegraph is a welcome one. It's hard to disagree with him when he argues: "Everyone is talking about whether it is fair to impose retrospective limits -- but actually, the biggest test for Legg is whether he will take on the biggest abusers of the expenses regime or let them off the hook."

I've always thought a clearer distinction needs to be made between ... read more

Tags: Expenses Scandal

Disgraced MPs should follow Profumo's example

The worst expenses abusers should carry out Profumo-style good works

I am instinctively against the form of retrospective justice being applied to MPs' expenses. Sir Thomas Legg's review seems to have pandered to what Harriet Harman chillingly described as "the court of public opinion". (The court may be with the left on bank bonuses but it also supports capital punishment. I'd rather a precedent wasn't set.) Britain should be governed by the rule of law, not by panic ... read more

Tags: Expenses Scandal

3 comments

Most Popular

Love on the left

Osborne hoisted with his own petard

The turning of the tide

Rush to judgement

Salmond and Cameron resume their tug of war

Latest comments

Coalition considers charging for FoI requests

@mcquade Sorry, think you've missed the point.... So who decides what is frivolous or stupid when an organisation receives an FOI request? You?, Me? or the Polititian trying to hide...

From BigC, 15 February 09:19

Rush to judgement

"which has no relevance in modern society" Thats been the same argument for so many thousands of years. The difference with Britain post Labour is the state is now systematically against...

From Indu Pendent, 15 February 09:14

Rush to judgement

Well said Sir Michael.

From Indu Pendent, 15 February 09:09

Elsewhere on the Blogosphere
Past Entries
Blogroll
NewStatesman

Newsletter!
Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team
chronicle of protest
Vote!

Can the UK achieve it’s commitment to carbon reduction targets by 2020?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2010