A split in the pro-independence camp?
If the Yes campaign is to be successful, the SNP cannot afford to alienate smaller parties like the
By James Maxwell Published 06 March 2012 15:28
Readers in other parts of the UK may not be all that familiar with Patrick Harvie, co-convener of the Scottish Green Party (SGP). But north of the border, the Glasgow MSP has been a mainstay of the devolved political landscape for the best part of a decade, as well as one of its most consistently radical and provocative figures. So the significance of his latest intervention in the independence debate should not be underestimated.
Speaking to Holyrood magazine last week, Harvie hinted that he might be willing to abandon his traditional support for full Scottish self-government in favour of an enhanced devolutionary settlement: "(Independence) is not a point of principle for me", he said. "It's purely pragmatic...(and we) may want to refine the policy a bit - particularly if there's a third option (on the ballot paper)". This position was confirmed by an SGP spokesperson, who told the New Statesman that the Greens' constitutional stance was "not set in stone".
Despite the SGP's marginal status in Scottish politics - they have just two MSPs out of 129 - this could be an important development. The unionists' referendum strategy is to cast the SNP as a minority pressure group out of touch with mainstream, pro-devolution opinion. If effective, this will compound the suspicion that the nationalist surge is a temporary aberration at odds with Scots' fundamental desire to remain part of the United Kingdom. One way the SNP can avoid this is to form a united front with other, smaller independence-minded parties and organisations, of which the Greens are by far the most prominent. Failure to build such a coalition could just tip the balance of odds against a Yes vote in 2014.
But unionists shouldn't get excited quite yet. It's no secret that Harvie feels Alex Salmond is shutting non-SNP pro-independence voices out of the Yes campaign, so it's possible his comments were really a veiled bid for greater involvement. They may also be a reflection of the Greens growing antipathy towards the SNP as the party of devolved government. Over the last five years, the SGP has become more and more critical of the nationalists. Much of their hostility is a response to what they see as the SNP's tendency to side with the interests of big business over those of the environment, with the first minister's vocal support for Donald Trump's golf course development in Aberdeenshire and the construction of a second road bridge over the Firth of Forth being the main ca! ses in point.
Yet despite these policy disagreements and the general bad feeling between the two parties, it remains probable that the Greens will still campaign for outright independence over the next two and half years. One of the major prizes of full self-government would be the power to force the removal of the British nuclear deterrent from its current home on the Clyde - a longstanding ambition of the Scottish environmental lobby. This would not be possible under maximum devolution or federalism, both of which would see defence and foreign affairs remain under Westminster control.
The fact, though, that they are even threatening such a dramatic shift in position reveals just how strained the SNP's relations with other parties in Scotland are, including those with whom it should be on good terms. Given most polls show a majority of Scots continue to oppose the break-up of Britain, the nationalists simply can't afford to further alienate any of their would-be allies.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















31 comments
Fergus Pickering why are you such an halfwit?
There is nothing Scottish about the Green party.
^ Care to speak sense?
------------------
As a Green member I'm not signing up to Alex Salmond's vision of an independent Scotland.
The Greens are not a nationalist party. It is worth repeating the Greens are not a nationalist, they are an independent Green party based in Scotland. The only policy they have on Scotland is that they support a referendum - that's it. There is absolutely nothing Scottish about the Green party.
Quote, Aberdare, "As a Green member I'm not signing up to Alex Salmond's vision of an independent Scotland."
Of course you wouldn't you are not a nationalist!
The Greens have said repeatedly that they favour an independent Scotland, Callum. Harvie is on record saying it.
One thing Maxwell glosses over is the SNP's green agenda, which the Greens support. Don't forget the facts in future please, James.
Quote, The Corrector, "and we will back this third option".
Is that it? Compare those measly 7 words on just a referendum to the Greens liturgy on saving the planet.
The Scottish Greens are not a nationalist party. They have no vision, no aims and no goals for an independent Scotland.
As I said there is nothing Scottish about the Green party.
Aberdare's comment is a good example of what is, to me, the main problem with the Scottish Greens contribution to the constitutional debate at the moment.
Don't get me wrong, I am glad there is a pro-Independence party that doesn't agree with everything the SNP say. But so far, really all we seem to have heard from the Greens is "Alex Salmond wants to do this, and we don't like that" or "The SNP have said they will do this and it's dreadful."
That's fine. Make that point. But then follow it up with a positive statement about what your party would do differently. That's what Independence is supposed to be about. It's not supposed to be set in stone by the SNP right now.
Amongst the voices that are for Independence, bitter sniping at each other over their exact policy for a post Independence era makes it less likely that era will ever arrive. A united front needs to be presented. It needs to be made clear that yes, you disagree with each other on the details, but that on the principle you have complete agreement - the best future for Scotland lies in the ability to make all our own decisions and define for ourselves the direction and character of our nation.
what's rattled NewStatesman's cage?
So much for being a progressive magazine. It appears it's yet another jaded rag.
Afaulds, healthy debate is *needed* both between the Yes and No sides and within. If Alex Salmond and the SNP are making policy pronouncements regarding an independent Scotland what are we supposed to do?
Quote, David, "The Greens have said repeatedly that they favour an independent Scotland, Callum. Harvie is on record saying it."
NO THEY HAVEN'T.
The Greens have never, ever come out in support of an independent Scotland. There has never been a Green policy or a Green manifesto commitment for an independent Scotland. The Greens reject the idea of swapping a centralised UK government for a centralised Scottish variety. The Greens support internationalism, European unionism and localism, not nationalism.
As I keep saying their is absolutely nothing Scottish about the Scottish Green Party. Anybody who says otherwise is acting like a politician.
Quote, Aberdare, "If Alex Salmond and the SNP are making policy pronouncements regarding an independent Scotland what are we supposed to do?"
You do nothing, the Greens are not a nationalist party.
If you don't think the Greens support independence you're quite simply an idiot.
No point in feeding the little troll.
The only other nationalist party in Scotland is the Scottish Socialist Party.
Solidarity like the Greens only promised a referendum on independence.
I am willing to be convinced about the Greens.
Show me a direct policy statement or a direct manifesto commitment by the Greens supporting Scottish independence (not a commitment on a referendum, nor more devolution).
Until then there is nothing Scottish about the Green party.
Some people are missing the point of independence. Once achieved, it will be for the Scottish people to decide future Scottish Government direction through independent Scottish Parliamentary elections. The SNP will take us there, with the support of others, but afterwards, it's up to the people, as it should be.
"Given most polls show a majority of Scots continue to oppose the break-up of Britain..." writes James Maxwell.
Most polls are now showing Yes to independence getting near 50%,with some now registering a majority in favour.Not that many pro-unionist writers and editors in the MSM would concede that.
What no polling research has ever done is show how strong pro-union support is.We know a lot of people would vote for devo max if it was on the ballot.But many of that group will be pro-independence in a gradualist sense and very open to persuasion to vote Yes(with or without a devo max option on the ballot).This I reckon is the underlying reality which perhaps unionist politicians and media just don't wish to contemplate.
@Dougie
Exactly Dougie.After independence the SNP would presumably be the party of government,just to begin with,but other parties would poll strongly.A separate Labour party in an independent Scotland would do well.So regular,progressive SNP/Labour coalition governments would be a real possibilty.Whereas at the moment we're ruled by a party with 5 MSPs in partnership with a party that has 1 Scottish MP.
Of course an SNP/Labour/Green coalition would also be a possibility.
Callum - you are WRONG! Go get yourself a Scottish Green Party manifesto from their website. You'll see a commitment to Scottish independence as subsidiarists. The Greens don't have to be nationalists to support independence. The Nats don't own that concept, which is proved by the number of people who supported the SNP at the last Scottish Parliament election but who don't actually support independence. Look at the figures. Get your facts right. Stop talking pish.
Callum - from page 21 of the Scottish Green Party's 2011 Scottish Parliament election manifesto:
"We’ll argue for a multi-option referendum with choices including the status quo, a stronger Scottish Parliament with powers defined through a participative process, and full independence based on a written constitution, and we will back this third option."
Do your research next time, you windbag!
Aberdare; I thought I had made it clear in my comment that it was quite right the Greens criticise the SNP where necessary, but that in doing so they need to present an alternative. So far, a lot of what we have seen has been 'Ugh, the SNP want to do this, that's not the kind of vision we support.' That doesn't sound very pro-Indy! It just sounds like another opponent.
Why not take an approach like 'The SNP want to do X when we become Independent. We absolutely disagree with X, because Y. Instead, the Scottish Greens would use the powers gained with Independence to do Z instead, as a fairer and greener alternative.' I'm not saying you don't do this already, just that more of it needs to be done!
But the Scottish don't like their greens. It's frozzen Mars bars that they like. Is there a party for that?
Stuart Eels, why are you such a twat? OK chaps, playtime over. Anything to say?
What a strange idea it is that to support independence you must define yourself as a nationalist and support the SNP's plans for an independent Scotland. As a pro-independence Scot who is not a nationalist nor a member of any particular party I will continue to support the SNP where I agree with them and oppose where I do not. Same goes for the Greens. Sound fair?
Fergus, if you are going to be a twat and take the piss at least get it right, it's deep fried mars bars and it's also an urban myth. I have never met anyone ever who has tried one, or would want to try one.
Fergus, having followed posts from both you and Stuart Eels on a number of threads, I can say with confidence that he's a lot more intelligent, articulate and thoughtful than you. Which probably isn't too difficult.
Who cares? Luddites like Harvie are an irrelevance beyond a small coterie of self-righteous middle class hand-wringers.
In the Holyrood magazine interview Patrick Harvie is quoted as saying that with the extra legislative and regulatory powers resulting from devo max,a separate Scottish foreign policy would be required.And with a separate foreign policy Scotland couldn't have a shared defence policy with London.That is hardly the stance of someone who is lukewarm about self-government.Yet James Maxwell was trying hard in this piece to depict Harvie as completely lacking enthusiasm for independence.Nice try James but it didn't work.
Given that the Pro-independence camp is a broad grouping from across the political spectrum it is not surprising that they don't agree on everything. Just the main point, that Scotland be independent.
With regards to the SNP its exactly the same, views from left to right are all quite happy in the same party because they agree on the main point, the most important point, that Scotland determine its own future. In a post independence Scotland many different and varying views will emerge from people who share the same platform at the moment
If publications such as the New Statesman are STILL getting confused about simple things likethis then I do wonder how they will cope when the actual debate begins
Well, Fraziel1, if all this Green crap doesn't get you looking for a joke I pity you. Greens and the SNP were made for each other. Except, of course, if the Scots really WERE Green they wouldn't use any of that wicked oil.
Is it another urban myth that the Scots have the worst teeth in the civiised world?