Rowan Williams: a New Statesman reader

Ten of the best pieces on the outgoing Archbishop of Canterbury from the NS archive.

1. Leader: The government needs to know how afraid people are (June 2011)

Published in the special edition of the magazine he guest-edited, Williams's celebrated leader accused the government of committing the country to "radical, long-term policies for which no one voted."

2. Interview: Rowan Williams (December 2008)

James Macintyre's long interview-profile of Williams included the Archbishop's reflections on sharia law, capitalism and the disestablishment of the Church.

3. Rowan Williams in conversation with William Hague (June 2011)

Williams's conversation with the Foreign Secretary ranged from the assassination of Osama Bin Laden to the Libyan intervention and the role of moral values in foreign policy.

4. Editor's Note -- after Rowan Williams (June 2011)

New Statesman editor Jason Cowley reflects on the remarkable fallout from Williams's political intervention.

5. It could have been me (February 2007)

In 2007, Williams reported on the plight of fellow Christian leader Samba Momesori, imprisoned for life without trial in Equatorial Guinea.

6. The week I was fired by the nicest man I know (July 2011)

George Pitcher explains the "schoolboy allusion" that led to his departure as Williams's public affairs secretary.

7. Leader: In praise of Rowan Williams (October 2011)

An NS editorial praised Williams's "admirable fearlessness" after he visited Zimbabwe to challenge Robert Mugabe's religious oppression.

8. Lethally polite bafflement (March 2012)

The New Statesman's culture editor Jonathan Derbyshire reviews Williams's "dialogue" (not "debate") with his fellow NS guest editor Richard Dawkins.

9. Leader: A global big society (June 2011)

In his second leader for the NS, Williams explores how the "democratic deficit" in Africa can be addressed.

10. Choosing an archbishop (September 2011)

The NS's religion blogger Nelson Jones asks why the appointment of Williams's successor should be left to "a faceless committee".

George Eaton is political editor of the New Statesman.

Photo: Getty
Show Hide image

UnHerd's rejection of the new isn't as groundbreaking as it seems to think

Tim Montgomerie's new venture has some promise, but it's trying to solve an old problem.

Information overload is oft-cited as one of the main drawbacks of the modern age. There is simply too much to take in, especially when it comes to news. Hourly radio bulletins, rolling news channels and the constant stream of updates available from the internet – there is just more than any one person can consume. 

Luckily Tim Montgomerie, the founder of ConservativeHome and former Times comment editor, is here to help. Montgomerie is launching UnHerd, a new media venture that promises to pull back and focus on "the important things rather than the latest things". 

According to Montgomerie the site has a "package of investment", at least some of which comes from Paul Marshall. He is co-founder of one of Europe's largest hedge funds, Marshall Wace, formerly a longstanding Lib Dem, and also one of the main backers and chair of Ark Schools, an academy chain. The money behind the project is on display in UnHerd's swish (if slightly overwhelming) site, Google ads promoting the homepage, and article commissions worth up to $5,000. The selection of articles at launch includes an entertaining piece by Lionel Shriver on being a "news-aholic", though currently most of the bylines belong to Montgomerie himself. 

Guidelines for contributors, also meant to reflect the site's "values", contain some sensible advice. This includes breaking down ideas into bullet points, thinking about who is likely to read and promote articles, and footnoting facts. 

The guidelines also suggest focusing on what people will "still want to read in six, 12 or 24 months" and that will "be of interest to someone in Cincinnati or Perth as well as Vancouver or St Petersburg and Cape Town and Edinburgh" – though it's not quite clear how one of Montgomerie's early contributions, a defence of George Osborne's editorship of the Evening Standard, quite fits that global criteria. I'm sure it has nothing to do with the full page comment piece Montgomerie got in Osborne's paper to bemoan the deficiencies of modern media on the day UnHerd launched. 

UnHerd's mascot  – a cow – has also created some confusion, compounded by another line in the writing tips describing it as "a cow, who like our target readers, tends to avoid herds and behave in unmissable ways as a result". At least Montgomerie only picked the second-most famous poster animal for herding behaviour. It could have been a sheep. In any case, the line has since disappeared from the post – suggesting the zoological inadequacy of the metaphor may have been recognised. 

There is one way in which UnHerd perfectly embodies its stated aim of avoiding the new – the idea that we need to address the frenetic nature of modern news has been around for years.

"Slow news" – a more considered approach to what's going on in the world that takes in the bigger picture – has been talked about since at least the beginning of this decade.

In fact, it's been around so long that it has become positively mainstream. That pusher of rolling coverage the BBC has been talking about using slow news to counteract fake news, and Montgomerie's old employers, the Times decided last year to move to publishing digital editions at set points during the day, rather than constantly updating as stories break. Even the Guardian – which has most enthusiastically embraced the crack-cocaine of rolling web coverage, the live blog – also publishes regular long reads taking a deep dive into a weighty subject. 

UnHerd may well find an audience particularly attuned to its approach and values. It intends to introduce paid services – an especially good idea given the perverse incentives to chase traffic that come with relying on digital advertising. The ethos it is pitching may well help persuade people to pay, and I don't doubt Montgomerie will be able to find good writers who will deal with big ideas in interesting ways. 

But the idea UnHerd is offering a groundbreaking solution to information overload is faintly ludicrous. There are plenty of ways for people to disengage from the news cycle – and plenty of sources of information and good writing that allow people to do it while staying informed. It's just that given so many opportunities to stay up to date with what has just happened, few people decide they would rather not know.