Tory MP quits party position in protest

Mark Pritchard resigns from Conservative Party post over Cameron's EU policy.

The Conservative MP Mark Pritchard has resigned from a party role in response to David Cameron's stance on the European Union. Pritchard, an MP in Shropshire since 2010 and a member of the 1922 Committee, steps down with immediate effect as Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party International Office.

In a letter dated today, obtained by Politics Home, Pritchard writes to the prime minister:

Given my concerns, regarding an increasing number of government politics, not least on immigration, Europe and a lack of clarity for national and individual aspiration, I believe remaining as deputy chairman would be inconsistent and inhibit my ability to speak out more freely on these and other issues.

The move by the openly eurosceptic Tory MP -- one of the 79 who rebelled against the coalition by demanding a referendum on British membership to the EU -- coincides neatly with renewed attacks on Cameron for his actions at last week's EU summit in Brussels. The prime minister claimed success at the summit, though European sources told the BBC he had got "half of what he was asking for".

Of his announcement, Pritchard said he had been "pondering this for about three or four weeks" and that his timing was "purely coincidental". At the very least, the news still shows what may be the first cracks in the prime minister's strained relationship with his Tory backbenchers.

Alice Gribbin is a Teaching-Writing Fellow at the Iowa Writers' Workshop. She was formerly the editorial assistant at the New Statesman.

Getty Images.
Show Hide image

Why relations between Theresa May and Philip Hammond became tense so quickly

The political imperative of controlling immigration is clashing with the economic imperative of maintaining growth. 

There is no relationship in government more important than that between the prime minister and the chancellor. When Theresa May entered No.10, she chose Philip Hammond, a dependable technocrat and long-standing ally who she had known since Oxford University. 

But relations between the pair have proved far tenser than anticipated. On Wednesday, Hammond suggested that students could be excluded from the net migration target. "We are having conversations within government about the most appropriate way to record and address net migration," he told the Treasury select committee. The Chancellor, in common with many others, has long regarded the inclusion of students as an obstacle to growth. 

The following day Hammond was publicly rebuked by No.10. "Our position on who is included in the figures has not changed, and we are categorically not reviewing whether or not students are included," a spokesman said (as I reported in advance, May believes that the public would see this move as "a fix"). 

This is not the only clash in May's first 100 days. Hammond was aggrieved by the Prime Minister's criticisms of loose monetary policy (which forced No.10 to state that it "respects the independence of the Bank of England") and is resisting tougher controls on foreign takeovers. The Chancellor has also struck a more sceptical tone on the UK's economic prospects. "It is clear to me that the British people did not vote on June 23 to become poorer," he declared in his conference speech, a signal that national prosperity must come before control of immigration. 

May and Hammond's relationship was never going to match the remarkable bond between David Cameron and George Osborne. But should relations worsen it risks becoming closer to that beween Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling. Like Hammond, Darling entered the Treasury as a calm technocrat and an ally of the PM. But the extraordinary circumstances of the financial crisis transformed him into a far more assertive figure.

In times of turmoil, there is an inevitable clash between political and economic priorities. As prime minister, Brown resisted talk of cuts for fear of the electoral consequences. But as chancellor, Darling was more concerned with the bottom line (backing a rise in VAT). By analogy, May is focused on the political imperative of controlling immigration, while Hammond is focused on the economic imperative of maintaining growth. If their relationship is to endure far tougher times they will soon need to find a middle way. 

George Eaton is political editor of the New Statesman.