The European Parliament's hand-out to the far-right
The decision to award money to anti-semitic parties shows where the EU is going wrong.
By Denis MacShane Published 05 March 2012 18:25
The fight against anti-semitism has just got a whole lot more difficult. The Conservatives, Socialists and Liberals in the European Parliament have just decided to extend a massive subsidy to promote political anti-semitism. €289,266 of taxpayers' money will now be given to openly anti-Jewish parties like Hungary's Jobbik, whose MEPs tried to take their seats in Strasbourg wearing the uniform of the anti-Jewish Hungarian Guard. Krisztina Moravi headed the Jobbik list in the last European Parliament elections and declared she "would be glad if the so-called Hungarian Jews went back to playing with their tiny circumcised dicks instead of vilifying me."
Another beneficiary is the British National Party, whose leader and senior MEP, Nick Griffin, has denied the holocaust and whose only lengthy publication, Who are the Mindbenders?, accused Jewish journalists of forming a secret lobby to control the media. Griffin has moved on to plough the more politically profitable furrows of Islamophobia and anti-immigrant xenophobia but across the European far-right the threnody of a disappeared national identity lost of Jewish influence remains strong.
Predictably, le grandpère of anti-semitic parliamentary politics, Jean Marie Le Pen, who is still an MEP at the age of 83 after decades of anti-Jewish sneers, will also benefit from the handout. The European Parliament grant has been given to the European Alliance of National Movements, (EANM) a grouping of 13 far-right parties. Only three of them have MEPs - eight in total from Britain's BNP, France's Front National, and Hungary's Jobbik.
The grant is to the EANM, even though European Parliament rules stipulate that any political group in Strasbourg should have at least 25 members and have MEPs from at least seven member states. The hurdle is not that high and Britain's Conservatives were able to forge their own alliance with fellow Eurosceptic parties after the 2009 Strasbourg election. But under no interpretation of the European Parliament's rules is there any justification for giving thousands of Euros to extremist anti-democratic parties that do not even have the support to win the odd seat in the Strasbourg assembly under its lax proportional representation electoral system.
Instead this is a fix within a fix. Once elected, MEPs operate an Ottoman system of divvying up the spoils of office between themselves. In the closed corridors of Brussels and Strasbourg, the leaders of the Socialists, Conservatives, Liberal-Democrats, Greens, Communists and Christian Democrats decide who will be president of the European Parliament and who will chair all the key committees. The votes are pure formalities as the deals are decided by a handful of top MEPs without any reference to their colleagues, to their parties, still less to voters.
It is the depressingly undemocratic and unaccountable nature of the European Parliament that has led more and more pro-Europeans like Germany's former Foreign Minister, Joschka Fischer, France ex-president, Valéry Giscard D'Estaing and myself, to call for reform of the European Parliament so that is has some connection to European citizens.
The scandal of handing out cash to Europe's anti-semites and to parties without even an MEP to their name might encourage governments, who ultimately vote this money, to think harder about overdue reform of the European Parliament. Ever since David Cameron quit the mainstream centre-right grouping in the European Parliament to build links with Latvian defenders of the Waffen SS or the clericalist, nationalist Law and Justice Party in Poland, the Conservatives have had an unhappy relationship with the European Parliament. Their best-known MEP, Edward MacMillan Scott defected to the Liberal Democratic group in 2009 and last week, the Tories' best-known Midlands MEP, Roger Helmer, defected to UKIP.
But Labour and the Lib Dems are scarcely in better shape. UKIP and BNP MEPs outnumber Labour MEPs as the European Parliament allows the election of extreme or fringe candidates who have little real purchase in national politics in terms of parliamentary or local elections. The three decades of the European Parliament's existence has seen ever-decreasing participation in its elections. National parliaments feel utterly excluded from oversight of EU decision-making. The decision to award money to anti-semitic parties should be the occasion for a major re-think about the role and purpose of the European Parliament.
Denis MacShane is MP for Rotherham and a former Europe Minister
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists



















20 comments
Confrontation with the fact who among our compatriots were deemed appropriate legislators by several of those would certainly bring home to the British people, among others, the reality of those to whose legislative will we were subject both in the European Parliament and in the Council of Ministers. The Council of Ministers, in which we are now being legislated for by the totally unelected governments of Italy and Greece. http://www.furniturehq.org/
At last the EU is doing something right! Denis Macshane was a total disgrace when he was Minister for Europe, he lied all the time, and because of this the BBC loved him and had him on to speak about the EU all the time. They still have him on when they want to criticise the Tory party.
Of course the BNP has picked up working class votes from Labour, it is the only party that tells us the truth about the affects that immigration has had upon this country. Of course the left-wing media that virtually runs this country and most others in the EU tells the most appalling lies about it to convince people not to vote for it, and because of this people do not, and we are on the way to hell in a handcart because of this fact.
As rules stand we can not do much if people elect undesireables entitled to office expenses. The present re-emergence of "kick the cat politics" does show the consequences of not grasping the nettles of building a just society - people go for displacement activities and a certain type of cynical property owner does not object if it keeps Parliament away from a fairer distribution.
Don't communist parties also receive funding?
I don't understand the objection to anti-semites in the European Parliament, so long as they represent their constituencies (anti-semitism is a natural feature of "Christendom").
I agree with the rest of your objection to the to the selection of and money distribution among MEPs.
I don't understand the objection to anti-semites in the European Parliament, so long as they represent their constituencies (anti-semitism is a natural feature of "Christendom").
I agree with the rest of your objection to the to the selection of and money distribution among MEPs.
The BNP are national socialists - they actually have alot in common with the the writer of this article.
If it wasnt for social engineering and mass immigration the BNP wouldnt exist.
You see the Tory party are not true conservatives, they have never been since Thatcher came in - that is where UKIP shine, because they want 1950s style conservatism, not neo liberalism.
Nothing is what it says it is, eh, Matt Thompson? The extreme right are really the extreme left, while MacShane is really a socialist, and the Tories are libertarians. Best watch out for UKIP then or they might also turn out to be something else.
Why the objection to these parties getting money? They are democratically elected parties and probably a damn site more committed to free speech than the left who want to censor everyone who says anything they disagree with.No one hates rational debate more than the left.
BNP voters are for the most part disillusioned labour voters. How can they possibly be right wing.
Disillusioned Tories vote UKIP
Oh yes, Mr Denise Macshane i remember you, our former lackey for all things Europe, who desperately tried to tarnish Nigel Farage and UKIP with false allegations and dragging them into the expenses scandal . While fiddling expenses himself.
You are a festering piece of puss Mr Macshane.
That the BNP vote comes from traditional Labour supporters is lazy drivel, and based on the assumption that Labour could ordinarily expect every vote cast in, say, the North West, or the East End of London. Without exception, ward by ward and box by box, BNP support is in the relatively more upmarket end of the given town or locality, however little that may be saying in any objective terms. At Glasgow North East, the Labour vote held up sufficiently that Labour kept the seat, while the Conservative vote went down so far and the BNP vote went up so far that they were almost even at the end. If the BNP has a consciously working-class following, then it is the only Fascist party in the world ever to have had one. It does not. It is like all the others, including the British Union of Fascists and the National Front in their respective days: a vehicle for those who see themselves as a cut above their “chav” neighbours; for, in British terms, “Tories” in Labour areas. Interviewed as Leader of the Opposition on 27th January 1978, Margaret Thatcher was asked if she was trying to bring the National Front’s supporters back to the Conservative Party. “Oh, very much back, certainly” was her reply. The full text of that interview now appears on the website of her Margaret Thatcher Foundation.
Far from being the voice of the self-identifying white working class, the BNP could not manage a Member of the European Parliament in the North East in 2009, and I am not sure that it has any councillor above Parish or Town level here. It certainly has no one on the newly unitary Durham County Council, nor had it on any of the preceding District Councils. Are the North East in general and County Durham in particular not white enough for them, or not working-class enough from them, or both? In any case, the BNP is now going the way of the National Front before it and of the British Union of Fascists before that. They, too, made a lot of noise, but nothing much more than that, for a few years, and then went away. It will be 30 or 40 years before the same thing happens again.
Based on its geographical distribution, half of the UKIP vote for Strasbourg must be Old Labour or Old Liberal rather than Old Tory. Add together the Tory and UKIP votes, and you get far too many "natural Tories" in London, or either of the Midland regions, or any of the Northern regions, or the South West.
If the Council of Ministers met in public and published an Official Report akin to Hansard, until which time British Ministers ought to adopt the show-stopping Empty Chair Policy, then there would be no need for a European Parliament or Assembly of any kind.
The sort of characters who turn up in the Council of Ministers would continue to make the most important point made by the European Parliament, namely that our participation in the EU subjects us to the legislative will of Stalinists and Trotskyists, neo-Fascists and neo-Nazis, members of Eastern Europe's kleptomaniac nomenklatura, neoconservatives such as now run France and Germany, people who believe the Provisional Army Council to be the sovereign body throughout Ireland, Dutch ultra-Calvinists who will not have women candidates, and Daniel Cohn-Bendit of das da (have a Google). Soon to be joined by Turkey’s Islamists, secular ultranationalists, and violent Kurdish Marxist separatists.
There could usefully be in the European Parliament one citizen of each member-state appointed by the Leader of each of the Groups (pretendy EU-wide parties) of elected MEPs, and the same by the representative of the non inscrits on the Conference of Presidents. Or even a whole Senate, a second chamber of such appointees, with each member-state having a number of Senators equal to its number of votes in the Council of Ministers when Qualified Majority Voting was employed.
Confrontation with the fact who among our compatriots were deemed appropriate legislators by several of those would certainly bring home to the British people, among others, the reality of those to whose legislative will we were subject both in the European Parliament and in the Council of Ministers. The Council of Ministers, in which we are now being legislated for by the totally unelected governments of Italy and Greece.
Is Denis MacShane finally starting to see the point?
Boiled down, MacShane objects to money being given to these democratically elected parties because he does not like their policies.
Really he should concern himself more with his own finances rather than that of others:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/labour-mps-expen...
Perhaps this signatory both to the Henry Jackson Society and to the Euston Manifesto might care to explain how this is any worse than the funding of Stalinist and Trotskyist parties, or how that funding is any better than this?
The Polish Law and Justice Party deservea better British allies. Like the Catholic and other Labour MPs, including John Smith, who fought tooth and nail against abortion and easier divorce. Like the Methodist and other Labour MPs, including John Smith, who fought tooth and nail against deregulated drinking and gambling. Like those, including John Smith, who successfully organised (especially through USDAW) against Thatcher’s and Major’s attempts to destroy the special character of Sunday and of Christmas Day, delivering the only Commons defeat of Thatcher’s Premiership. And like the trade unionists who battled to secure paternal authority in families and communities by securing its economic base in high-waged, high-skilled, high-status male employment, frequently marching behind banners that depicted Biblical scenes and characters.
The Czech Civic Democrats deserve British allies like the trade unionists who have spent decades defending the high-waged, high-skilled, high-status jobs of the working class. Not for us the restriction of travel to the rich, or the arresting of economic development in the poorer parts of the world.
The Latvian Fatherland and Freedom Party deserves British allies with deep roots in the former mining communities, in the women’s suffrage movement, in the 1945 General Election victory, and elsewhere. We are unsullied by the weird cult of Winston Churchill. Instead, we can and do condemn his carve-up of Europe with Stalin. Just as we condemn genocidal terrorism against Slavs and Balts no less than genocidal terrorism against Arabs, or the blowing up of British Jews going about their business as civil servants, or the photographed hanging of teenage British conscripts with barbed wire. Just as we condemn Ronald Reagan’s laying of a wreath at an SS cemetery in Germany, and the Clintons’ annual wreath-laying at Confederate memorials in Arkansas. Just as we condemn SS revivalism from Denmark and Flanders to Bosnia and Kosovo. And just as we condemn the neo-Nazi cesspit that was the 1980s Radical Right. Whatever happened to the 1980s Radical Right, Dave?
And they all deserve British allies like the Labour MPs who mostly voted against Heath’s Treaty of Rome, who all voted against Thatcher’s Single European Act, and who voted against Major’s Maastricht Treaty in far greater numbers than the Tories, including the only resignation from either front bench in order to do so. Those parties need these British allies in order to call them away from neoliberal economics and neoconservative foreign policy, both of which have in any case collapsed. Nothing could be more destructive of national self-government, or traditional family values, or the historical consciousness of a people. Cameron is completely signed up to both.
Yes, UKIP is basically the 1950s Conservative Party. The BNP, on the other hand, is the 1850s Conservative Party (they've even flirted with wanting to restore the Stewart line of succession, in line with Tory policy of the 1700s).
"The decision to award money to anti-semitic parties shows where the EU is going wrong" What's the matter!! Didn't the New Statesman get it's slice of the pie?
So what? Jews are a small minority. It's time to do what's right for the European peoples and not the whiny minorities. Nationalism is the answer.
Love the idea that EMS is regarded by McShane was the best known Tory MEP. He cannot have heard of Hannan.
The BNP's only getting this money because your lot decided that PR was an appropriate way to elect members to this parliament.