The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Will Osborne's 45p tax gamble pay off?

Despite the political riskiness of such a move, the 50p tax rate will be scrapped in this week's Bud

Since George Osborne became Chancellor in May 2010, the 50p rate of tax has been a political headache. Instinctively a low tax Conservative, he has been unable to cut the top rate of tax because of his commitment to deficit reduction and the difficulty of justifying such a move as people across the country face unemployment and pay freezes.

The extraordinarily public negotiations over Wednesday's Budget over the last few weeks have shown that scrapping the 50p rate is high on the agenda. Last week, it was suggested it could be slashed as low as 40p. Today, the Telegraph reports that it is going to be cut to 45p from April 2013.

Osborne's argument is that the tax undermines investment and entrepreneurship. The government will cite figures which show that the tax has not raised as much revenue as hoped. When Alistair Darling introduced the tax in 2009, it was predicted it would raise £2.6bn, but reportedly the figure is in the hundreds of millions. Osborne will claim that cutting the tax to 45p could in fact raise more money as less people will avoid it.

It is difficult to see this flying with the public. The fact remains that this is a very popular tax: the polls have consistently shown overwhelming public support for the 50p rate. Last September, YouGov found that 59 per cent wanted to keep the tax -- including 50 per cent of Tory voters -- while just 23 per cent overall wanted to scrap it. A ComRes poll found that 48 per cent would like to see it raised to 60p, while 33 per cent did not.

Most Liberal Democrats are likely to be uncomfortable with the move, which is to be offset with a so-called "tycoon tax" aimed at preventing tax avoidance. Nick Clegg will insist that the "rich will pay more" after the Budget, while the increase in the tax-free personal allowance is expected to be speeded up. The tax threshold was due to be raised to £10,000 from April 2015, but Osborne could indicate that this will be moved forward a year.

Yet for all these moves to neutralise it, cutting the 50p rate, which only affects those earning over £150,000, remains potentially explosive. Stephen Williams, co-chair of the Lib Dem Treasury committee, told the BBC yesterday: "I certainly don't think that now would be the right time to announce the abolition of the 50p or the reduction of the 50p rate of tax. 2012 is going to be quite a difficult year for many families up and down the country."

As my colleague George Eaton wrote last week, the attack lines for Labour write themselves. Tax cuts for the rich are a difficult sell at the best of times. When the rest of the country remains mired in economic strife, it looks like a political impossibility.

12 comments

matthew fox's picture

Who is Ken Livingston ?

Mr Danger's picture

Ken Livingstone

matthew fox's picture

I see Mr Dangertomyself, thanks for the clarification, much appreciated.

Awake!'s picture

@ Booyakasha
don't fret!! the rich have been reminded what the crazy left are capable of and that they haven't gone away... So many rich have already gone. And anyone with half a brain and a good idea won't be setting up base in the UK, it's clear the socialists want your money and believ they are entitled to it.
UK will become a very poor country in the next 20-30 years, it's oil spent it will be hailed as an example to asian kids as to how empires finally implode. And the leftirs will revel in it lol.
Bags half packed.

p j wall's picture

I honestly believe Gideon, and Flashman, don`t give a flying 'you know what' about the publics reaction!!, they think we`re all un educated fools, who should know our place. Surely, even Tories can see, this just confirms the old Tory trait, "To make the rich work harder, pay them more, To make the poor work harder, pay them less", we`re getting back to trickle down economics!. Gideon and Flashmans Hubris is taken for granted, at a time when the country is going through Austerity, the Tories top priority, is to cut the Tax rates of the wealthiest in our society!, under the guise, that this will help the poorest??. It`s going to be very amusing, watching 'Yellow Belly' Clegg squirming, trying to justify this action!, whilst the rest of the Collaborators will be looking for new jobs in 2015, because they will be OBLITERATED!!

nourredine's picture

If the budget is as it is described in this post, why oh!why Mr Osborne is not putting a team to stop tax evasion when he recognize himself that the 50%tax has not raised the objective hoped for?
And if there is no money why oh! why Mr Osborne is not keeping the tax and increase it?
WE ARE IN IT TOGETHER
When the minority rich complain Mr Osborne drop the rate of tax for them.
When the majority of low and middle wages complain Mr Osborne reduce child benefits,reduce pension credits,put a cap on the benefits claim, introduce a regional pay,increase unemployment,flat lining growth,and much more.

mcquade's picture

"it was predicted it would raise £2.6bn"

Yes, in its second year, not it's first. Come on George, let's have a bit if accuracy in the reporting.

mcquade's picture

I'll correct that. Samira, readers rightly expect high levels of accuracy from your reporting.

martybee's picture

Rope

mcquade's picture

Brian, you've forgotten to take your pills again.

Mr Danger's picture

"the 50%tax has not raised the objective hoped for?"

Ask Ken Livingston.

booyakasha's picture

I find it quite amazing that spending/investing to boost growth is a total misnomer, whilst taxing the rich less will improve the level of our deficit.

...are we in some sort of Twilight Zone, 5th dimension or summat?

Latest tweets