The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Sarkozy sets out his stall

The French president will tack right to head off the threat of Marine Le Pen.

Nicolas Sarkozy is due to announce officially that he will run for the French presidency again next week. But in an interview today with the right-leaning newspaper Le Figaro he sets out the main themes of his campaign. As Alexandre Lemarié argues in Le Monde, those themes are designed to appeal to voters tempted by the Front National's Marine Le Pen, who could threaten Sarkozy's participation in the second and decisive round of the presidential election in May.

Here is some of what he said.

Work and responsibility

  • "After five years as president, I am more convinced than ever that work must be rewarded. It's not a question simply of saying that you have to work to succeed - that's obvious - but that work is a value in itself, necessary to the accomplishment of the individual and to social cohesion."
  • "I would say the same about responsibility. It is what gives freedom its meaning. One is free to the extent that one is responsible - to oneself and to others. So I see responsibility as the indispensible accompaniment to freedom. Freedom without constraint or limit, freedom as the principle of a society in which everything is permitted and in which one doesn't have to account for oneself, is not a value I identify with."

The French economy and competitiveness

  • "What is most harmful in our system is its authoritarian character, its disconnection from the day-to-day running of businesses."
  • "If, in a given business, the employees and the boss agree on the terms of employment, salaries and flexibility, then their agreement should be authorised by law and take precedence over invididual contracts. This is the choice we've made with [Prime Minister] François Fillon, and it's what has allowed the Germans to succeed to a great extent in their struggle against unemployment. This new flexibility will benefit the French economy as well as employees, who will benefit from an increase in competitiveness."

Gay marriage

  • "I'm not in favour [of gay marriage]. In 2007, I proposed civil partnerships. We didn't bring them in because we realised that it was unconstitutional to reserve such partnerships for homosexuals alone. The notion of a civil partnership threatens the institution of marriage ... In these troubled times, I don't think it is wise to sully the image of this essential social institution [marriage].

National identity

  • "I say to the French people: be proud of your country; we have values; we are like no other people; we must continue to welcome foreigners, but those whom we welcome must love our country. It's for those who arrive here to assimilate our rules - it's not for republican principles to adapt to them. We have been able to integrate earlier waves of migration into the republican melting-pot because the new arrivals had cultural and religious attachments close to ours. More recent immigration is different."
  • "France has made considerable efforts to create places of worship in order that everyone feels that their differences are being acknowledged. But equally, limits have to be fixed. In 2008, I explained that the burqa or the niqab should be banned. I also asked that prayers in the street be curtailed, because, in a secular state, other citizens shouldn't have to see that."
  • "France has Christian, or Judeo-Christian, roots. That is a historical reality that it would be absurd to deny! Look at the churches and cathedrals that cover our country. France was born out of the meeting between the will of kings and that oif the Church. Joan of Arc, the 600th anniversary of whose birth we've just celebrated, was born at the crossroads of that double will. Saying that doesn't imply that one belongs to a church, nor that one is any less committed to the values of the Republic or the principles of secularism. Let's not cut France off from part of its history."

12 comments

Russell E. Willis's picture

Matthew 19:4-6 ( KJV ) read as follows:
"And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE, and said, FOR THIS CAUSE SHALL A MAN LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER, AND SHALL CLEAVE TO HIS WIFE: AND THEY TWAIN SHALL BE ONE FLESH? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder."

French president Nicolas Sarkozy is wrong about civil partnerships. The only relationship that God ( see 2 Timothy 3:16, 17, for example ) allows, which involves sexual intercourse between a man and a woman, is the marriage relationship ( see also Hebrews 13:4, for example ). Furthermore, homosexuality is a sin ( see Romans 1:24-32 ( especially verses 26 through 28, for example ), for example ). Thus, civil partnerships are sinful.

Sincerely in Christ,
Russell E. Willis
P.S. - Please read Proverbs 23:23.
P.P.S. - Also, the words in all capital letters in Matthew 19:4, 5 ( KJV ) indicate quotations from the Old Testament. Therefore, I was not yelling.

Anon's picture

Am I mad or is that a fair poinjt about history?

Anon's picture

Simple question Russell, did God's law exist previous to being written down into those passages you quote, and has it never altered since then. If not, and assuming from what you say, doesn't that make the Gospel writers (for example) more important than Christ Himself as their reports are more important than our personal experience of His presence. Ergo, more important than God. At least Muslim fundamentalists are intellectually coherent.

Anon's picture

example.. read your history.. there was a choice of Gospels

Anthony's picture

@Fraziel I think you might be right but i always did like rooting for the underdog !!

Fraziel1's picture

@Anthony, me too

Alan's picture

The rhetoric on national identity is pretty sinister. In times of crisis it seems the human defence of choice is to cloak yourself in familiarity. That'll scare the bogeyman away. Not.

C Baker's picture

Sarkozy- Tu nes pas idiot. Goodbye, not au revoir.

His stupidity with Merkel. We will enforce austerity on Greece. The pair of them must be deluded.

France for me, is the enlightenment and massive improvements in medicine and prison reform. Art, literature, secularism, equality.

Not this self serving euro robot. It just shows how far removed from socialism france has severed itself. That's the poison of the eu. Soon, Le pen will be putting fascistbots in charge of Greece etc.

Even in the UK, our right, with any chance of goverment is the conservatives.

France's right is Le Pen, not eric pickles! Long live Mr Pickles!

Plug's picture

C Baker, did you post after a good lunch? If you're going to insult someone in their own language, have the grace to do it properly. Simplement, vous etes un idiot, ou vous n'etes pas un idiot... Et toi?

Hugh Markey's picture

A son whose aristo father was fleeing Fascist Hungary then about to be flattened by the Red Army steamroller, knows all about French history.
Sarkozy should have no trouble moving to the right and ingratiating himself with the new German Reich.

Achtung!

Anthony's picture

U.K = UKIP for the win !
U.S.A = Ron Paul for the win !
France = Le Pen for the win !

Liberty and nation states for the win !

Fraziel1's picture

Anthony, UKIP have no chance, Ron paul has no chance but le Pen? Definite chance there.I hope marine Le pen wins over that cuban heel wearing corrupt eurocrat.

Latest tweets