Labour backs the Bishops on benefits
Liam Byrne says Labour will support amendment exempting child benefit from £26,000 cap.
By George Eaton Published 23 January 2012 17:33
After weeks of anguished deliberation, Liam Byrne, the shadow work and pensions secretary, has finally announced that Labour will support the Bishops' amendment exempting child benefit from the £26,000 cap if its own proposed safeguards are voted down. In response, Iain Duncan Smith quipped that the opposition "have taken more positions on this (the benefits cap) than a Jane Fonda workout".
Indeed, somewhat confusingly, Labour doesn't actually want child benefit exempted from the cap (which it supports in principle). Rather, it is supporting the amendment as a means of getting the welfare bill back to the Commons, where a new vote can be held on its homelessness amendment.
The Conservatives, aware that the cap has the overwhelming support of the electorate (76 per cent of voters, including 69 per cent of Labour supporters, back the policy), are relaxed about the possibility of defeat in the House of Lords tonight. Indeed, Channel 4's Gary Gibbon claims that they are "on their knees praying for it". The more headlines accusing Labour of "wrecking" the cap, the better, they think.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















33 comments
@Mrs,M L Bonwick-Jones
Are you sure it was only £65k?, it was probably £65 million?, because all people claiming benefits are millionaires with 8 kids and live in mansions, don`t they?, and they drive their Porsch`s and Lamborghini`s to sign on!!, before staying in the pub all day!, and all these disabled people are all layabout malingerers?, nothing wrong with any of them!, it must be true true the Daily Heil, Express, Torygraph keep telling us!!, and those reliable impartial sources 'FRAZIEL1' and 'LUDDITE' also keep telling us about all these nasty abuses!, it`s just not cricket!!, i believe there`s even a family of layabouts and scroungers living in Buck Palace!!, it`s just not on!.
Yes, the bishops in the Lords (an anachronism if there ever was one) can pander to the conscientious in this stance, yet continue to oppose equality for gay and lesbian people. Enough already of these hypocrites; the sooner they are removed permanently Parliament the better. The Archbishop of Canterbury and his acolyte bishops support the introduction of Islamic Law into the UK but continue to advocate denying women and gay members of their own church equal treatment. Stick to your Sunday sermons where only 3% of people bother to turn up, and see how much power you are able to wield from there!
p j swall, I think I hear the sound of someone losing the argument. If the lasy claimed to 15 years allowance for a car she had not got, what would that add up to? And is she right?Was she entitled to an allowance she was not entitled to. I suppose Long John Silver was entitled to be a pirate because he was disabled, was he?
" A Jane Fonda Workout " does IDS still use a pager as well.
Enemy of Working People, with unemployment at 2.685 million, Cameron has nothing but hatred for working people.
This benefit cap is massively popular with the electorate. Just like the Cameron's European veto/non-veto, Labour have come down on the wrong side of public opinion.
Labour may back the Bishops, but few support the Bishops. Go-on Labour keep digging.
No matthew fox, it's you're now totally economically discredited Labour party that hates hard working people.
@Fergus Pickering
There`s me, aren`t i naive, thinking it was the Greedy Landlords who got all of this extortionate housing benefit?, and i wish people would leave the Multi Millionaire C.E.Os alone! they deserve their average 49% pay rises!, even though their business results didn`t merit it!, in fact, i`d cut their taxes aswell, the ones who pay it, that is?, we should bring back victorian workhouses for all children of people on benefits!, and their parents could be used to dispose landmines by making them walk across them around the trouble spots of the world!, i`m sure all our Tory apoligists would approve?.
@Luddite
I hope you`re not Bashing the BISHOPs???, again!!, that`s surely not allowed on your ward?.
p j wall. We don't need to be told by the "Daily Heil, Express, Torygraph keep telling us!!" All fully understand the wide-spread abuse of the benefit system. It's just a pity you're own wretched party doesn't. Labour is committing electoral suicide.
'Labour backs the Bishops on benefits'
Demonstrating yet again just how far removed from reality they all are.
p j wall. "Greedy Landlords" So how many affordable homes did Labour build? Let's not forget it was you're Labour party which imported mass-unemployment, 350.000 newly arrived immigrants all living on benefits.
the way this is being handled by the peers and bishops is totally against public opinion and cynical (this is possibly one other reason why we will lose the next election), the maximum amount of benefits (equal to a 35k a year job) should include all benefits including child benefit.
The cap will be found illegal. Because it is arbitrary. One family will be affected, and other won't be, in identical situations apart from having an extra child.
No legal system can work in this way, and the European courts, if not British, will strike this down.
As to the stupidity and cruelty of the Tories, well we know what they are. But what about the LibDems? What on earth are they up to - political suicide? Surely the headlines will start mounting up, of homeless families, spiralling poverty - not to mention the wreckage of the NHS - and the coalition will fall apart. At last.
They should cap Politician'a wages at £26,000 because they do next to nothing except inflict the electorate with hypocrisy, deceit, lies and feather their nests.
Politician's are the scroungers living of our taxes and abusing Mr & Mrs ordinary whilst they are claiming their wages through our tax system.
I was just about able to believe that £26,000 might be the mean, certainly not the median, gross income. But net? So that the gross figure is around £35,000? Pull the other one.
I was brought up to detest the tories and have never voted for them yet i can see they are not cruel or evil on this, its just fair. PJ Wall, i used to hold views like yours but after I left the labour club at University i grew up and stopped using such infantile arguments that only embarrass.
My natural instincts have always lay with labour but they have turned against working people ( even the public sector of which i am a part.labour being the "worst civil service employer in history" according to the PCS president Mark Serwotka), and seem to be on the side of benefit cheats,the workshy and immigrants before people who work. If 76% of people agree with the Tories, are they all on the right? Are they all readers of the Daily Heil? of course not.
People who work are just sick and tired of seeing people on benefits getting these huge sums.The left need to admit that many people actually do live very well on benfits rather than screeching about everyone being in poverty, it's just not true.
Labour will get slaughtered at the next election if they keep this up.I for one will be delighted when these idiot wealthy liberals with no clue how ordinary people live and who so despise public opinion are wiped out.
"The more headlines accusing Labour of "wrecking" the cap, the better, they think."
Sounds about right: the Tories don't want to solve political problems, they want headlines. They want to quip:
"have taken more positions on this (the benefits cap) than a Jane Fonda workout".
because sounding good equals being good, so far as they are concerned. Still no substance, nearly two years on.
pj wall, there you go againrunning off at the mouth. Is that supposed to be irony? Are you more than thirteen years old? How about addressing the questions people ask you? Des this legislation affect you directly or are youn just very stupid? It could be both, I suppose. Though it is irrelevant, I'm prepared to bet you are richer than I am. Come ion, fella, how much do you get a year. Of course if you are thirteen I mean how much do your daddy and mummy get?
@Frazial1
You really do belong in 30s Germany!!, Goebells would be very proud of you?, take that comment the way you want to!!.
@Fergus Pickering
Thanks for your compliments!, i find it strange your concern about my deceased parents?, i am employed, for over20 years!, but i was one of your heroes, Thatchers 3 million!, why dont you and all your other scapegoaters never seem to be to concerned about Tax Dodgers?, which outdoes benefit fraud by Billions?, and why dont yous never seem to be bothered about the Billions of unclaimed benefits?, most of the working public do sadly seem to have fallen for all the scaremongering and lies?, even friends of mine now think that EVERYONE on benefit gets at least £26k cash a year!!,even though it's blatently untrue!!, your ideological bedfellow Goebells was sadly correct when saying "Tell a lie often enough,people will start to believe it", where are you going to house all all of the people who will be thrown out of the properties they live in now?, by greedy landlords, and at what cost?, you have a bunch of over priviliged Multi Millionaires victimising the weakest in our society, whilst rewarding Greed and abuse by the richest!!, and playing on peoples prejudices and hatred towards immigrants, sick and disabled, and Everyone on benefit!!, You all have got to have someone to Hate and blame for everything, haven't you?, i've brought my young daughter up not to judge everyone the same, and to be tolerent, You wanna try it!!
@vince Conroy, approx 67 thousand families receive more than 26k a year in benefits. Thats a lot of families and a lot of money.
You see Vince your comment is idiotic. You think that because we objevt to people receiving enormous sums in benefits that we all think they are scroungers. You could not be more wrong. The welfare state is crucial but the sums being paid out to some families are ludicrous and have to be changed.
Liam Byrne and Labour: the friend of the workshy and the enemy of working people
@Rabyrover
This is all too typical of the right - denounce the unemployed as the 'undeserving poor', so that the blame for poverty can be laid at the poor themselves, thus providing the excuse not to address the real causes. Clearly, there are many on the right who have not moved on from the 19th century.
@Dark Heart of Toryland
You saw the abuses and did nothing.
Why is it that the bishops think that £ 26.000 after tax is poverty yet it's ministers in the Church of England take home around £ 22.000!
As for Labour 'the party of the working man' has endeavored to remain in no man's land.
@Dark Heart.
Those of us with a gross income of under £35K, as well as those with higher incomes, resent paying taxes to give greater benefits to the workshy than we can have in our take-home pay.
I remember that i found out that a Ex-Friend of my sister was able to save up £ 65.000 in 15 years Disability living allowance for car that was adapted for her needs even if she could not drive! She was quite cross when she was found out saying she was entitled to it.
Post new comment