Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read pieces from this morning's papers.

1. Bash the poor and wave the flag - how this Tory trick works (Guardian)

Jonathan Freedland explains how in a move imported from the US right, the Conservatives have successfully induced people to vote against their own interests.

2. This is a question of honour for the coalition -- not Stephen Hester (Daily Telegraph)

To do difficult things, the government must stand behind its own policies and people, says Charles Moore.

3. It's a crisis of confidence, not of capitalism (Financial Times)

We must return to the principles of the free market, writes George Osborne.

4. The Days of Our Youth (Times) (£)

European leaders need to tackle their terrible rates of youth unemployment, says leading article.

5. Philanthropy is the enemy of justice (Guardian)

The world's poor are not begging for charity from the rich, says Robert Newman -- they're asking for justice and fairness.

6. The outsider who has run foul of the FSA (Financial Times)

David Einhorn, the fund titan who shorted Lehman, has sold himself short, write Sam Jones and Dan McCrum.

7. Why protesters should occupy London 2012 (Times) (£)

Giles Coren writes that instead of banning tents from the Olympics, we should give medals for formal displays of civil disobedience.

8. Hornby: the end of the line (Guardian)

If play is the work of childhood, says Andrew Martin, Hornby's struggle is grim news for the future of UK manufacturing.

9. Class warfare need not be taxing (Financial Times)

The pragmatic case for socking it to the rich is weak, said Christopher Caldwell.

10. God may not be great, but religion can be (Times) (£)

Janice Turner writes how as a teenage atheist, she removed Jesus from the Nativity scene. Now she has realised that something is missing.

New Statesman
Show Hide image

Quiz: Can you identify fake news?

The furore around "fake" news shows no sign of abating. Can you spot what's real and what's not?

Hillary Clinton has spoken out today to warn about the fake news epidemic sweeping the world. Clinton went as far as to say that "lives are at risk" from fake news, the day after Pope Francis compared reading fake news to eating poop. (Side note: with real news like that, who needs the fake stuff?)

The sweeping distrust in fake news has caused some confusion, however, as many are unsure about how to actually tell the reals and the fakes apart. Short from seeing whether the logo will scratch off and asking the man from the market where he got it from, how can you really identify fake news? Take our test to see whether you have all the answers.

 

 

In all seriousness, many claim that identifying fake news is a simple matter of checking the source and disbelieving anything "too good to be true". Unfortunately, however, fake news outlets post real stories too, and real news outlets often slip up and publish the fakes. Use fact-checking websites like Snopes to really get to the bottom of a story, and always do a quick Google before you share anything. 

Amelia Tait is a technology and digital culture writer at the New Statesman.