Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read pieces from this morning's newspapers.

1. This Republican abuse of the system is not the American way (Guardian)

The centuries-old US political system is one to be admired. Yet ironically it's under threat from those who claim to be patriots, argues Jonathan Freedland.

2. We're all in the Union. We must all have a vote (The Times) (£)

Scottish independence would create two new countries. The whole of the UK must be consulted before it happens, writes Matthew Parris.

3. There was a time when bigger wasn't always better (Telegraph)

Women's body types have been admired for different reasons in different eras, writes Vicki Woods.

4. If everyone did a Worrall Thompson, maybe Tesco wouldn't be too big to fail (Guardian)

Tesco's poor results have led it to review its practices. The self-service tills used by Wozza may be a good place to start, says Marina Hyde.

5. A no vote in Scotland could leave England begging for mercy (Guardian)

Cameron thinks he's being clever by forcing Alex Salmond's hand. He really, really isn't, says Deborah Orr.

6. Britain's reputation is in the dock over rendition (Independent)

Questions have been raised about the UK's line between decency and realpolitik, says this leading article.

7. A close-up of Richard Desmond that I wasn't ready for (Telegraph)

There were worries for the mental welfare of one participant at the Leveson Inquiry, writes Matthew Norman.

8. One Falklands problem, one civilised solution (Times) (£)

One Falklands problem, one civilised solution, writes Simon Winchester.

9. Hang on, Mr Salmond. The English MUST have a say on Scotland's future too... (Daily Mail)

Simon Heffer on the future of the Union.

10. For the families of Haditha, this is a matter of honour (Guardian)

Botched inquiries and lies in the wake of the Haditha massacre in Iraq mean the victims' families are still waiting for justice, writes the documentary maker Nick Broomfield.

Getty
Show Hide image

How Theresa May laid a trap for herself on the immigration target

When Home Secretary, she insisted on keeping foreign students in the figures – causing a headache for herself today.

When Home Secretary, Theresa May insisted that foreign students should continue to be counted in the overall immigration figures. Some cabinet colleagues, including then Business Secretary Vince Cable and Chancellor George Osborne wanted to reverse this. It was economically illiterate. Current ministers, like the Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, Chancellor Philip Hammond and Home Secretary Amber Rudd, also want foreign students exempted from the total.

David Cameron’s government aimed to cut immigration figures – including overseas students in that aim meant trying to limit one of the UK’s crucial financial resources. They are worth £25bn to the UK economy, and their fees make up 14 per cent of total university income. And the impact is not just financial – welcoming foreign students is diplomatically and culturally key to Britain’s reputation and its relationship with the rest of the world too. Even more important now Brexit is on its way.

But they stayed in the figures – a situation that, along with counterproductive visa restrictions also introduced by May’s old department, put a lot of foreign students off studying here. For example, there has been a 44 per cent decrease in the number of Indian students coming to Britain to study in the last five years.

Now May’s stubbornness on the migration figures appears to have caught up with her. The Times has revealed that the Prime Minister is ready to “soften her longstanding opposition to taking foreign students out of immigration totals”. It reports that she will offer to change the way the numbers are calculated.

Why the u-turn? No 10 says the concession is to ensure the Higher and Research Bill, key university legislation, can pass due to a Lords amendment urging the government not to count students as “long-term migrants” for “public policy purposes”.

But it will also be a factor in May’s manifesto pledge (and continuation of Cameron’s promise) to cut immigration to the “tens of thousands”. Until today, ministers had been unclear about whether this would be in the manifesto.

Now her u-turn on student figures is being seized upon by opposition parties as “massaging” the migration figures to meet her target. An accusation for which May only has herself, and her steadfast politicising of immigration, to blame.

Anoosh Chakelian is senior writer at the New Statesman.

0800 7318496