Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

The questions over Miliband's leadership that will not go away

The Labour leader will deliver a keynote speech on the economy -- but will it dispel doubts?

Ed Miliband might have been hoping for a new start to go with the New Year. But, so far, 2012 has provided no let up for the Labour leader.

In last week's New Statesman, the Blue Labour thinker Maurice Glasman summed up many of the doubts currently circulating:

On the face of it, these look like bad times for Labour and for Ed Miliband's leadership. There seems to be no strategy, no narrative and little energy.

This morning, ahead of a keynote speech on the economy, the Labour leader began the fight-back. Yet his appearance on Radio 4's Today programme will have done little to convince his critics that he does, indeed, have strategy, narrative and energy.

Today's speech, to London Citizens (Glasman's community organisation), is being billed as a major statement of Labour's position on the economy. The key shift is that Miliband will stress the seriousness of the deficit. He will concede that this means the next government will have to make decisions that "all of us wish we did not have to take", and that Labour can no longer depend on big spending.

On the Today programme, he trailed the message that Labour is "going to do it very differently from the past". But predictably, this point was overshadowed by questions about his leadership: interviewer John Humphrys told him that he was considered a "drag on the party", that the public do not view him as a leader, and asked whether he would stand down if considered unelectable. The response was: "It doesn't arise, John. Doesn't arise." This illustrates Miliband's determination to brush off these doubts about his presentational style as insubstantial and unimportant.

Arguably, there is little else he can do -- but will it work? In the Times (£) today, Rachel Sylvester quotes a No.10 strategist:

Miliband's got all the right messages. The focus groups like the things he says. The problem is that he's the person saying them.

Sylvester expands on this:

He says the right things, but he does not get through to the voters. He is setting the political agenda, frequently forcing his rivals to adopt the lines he takes, and yet the public seem to listen to them more than they listen to him. You could say he's leading and others are following, but it doesn't feel like that. He's like the woman who tells a joke at a dinner party but nobody laughs until it is repeated, more loudly, by the man sitting across the table.

It is certainly a "frustrating" situation (a word used by David Miliband in the Hindu Times this week), and it difficult to see how it can be turned around. Challenged by Humphrys with Glasman's statement that he has so far "flickered rather than shone", Miliband responded:

I've got a simple piece of advice for you. Don't declare the result of the race when it's not yet half run. Eighteen months into the parliament, you're saying the race is already run. The race is not already run. We have five years. I have a very strong inner belief that I will win the race.

The question is whether this inner belief will help to win the public over. Unless it translates into support, it will do little good.

Tags: Ed Miliband  Labour

9 comments

James's picture

Alas poor Ed, he cannot help the things that stand against him, but the truth is his voice, his tone, his words and his looks DO all reduce his hold with the public. The policy and the direction may or may not be what the public want, but as the article says, the difficulty is that is him saying it! He just doesn't FEEL like a leader. His older brother may, though personally I would hope Labour will try and find a new person untainted by its grubby past to lead it and to take on this government. Can't honestly think of anyone right now, so maybe Ed needs to carry on taking the flak for the time being!

Kernow Castellan's picture

Its a little unfair (albeit easy) to blame poor Ed. I think that Labour has some "toxicity issues" it has failed to address.

I was particularly struck by some focus group feedback I read (I forget where) about the "too far; too fast" line. Most people supported it, until they were told it was from Labour, at which point they switched.

David Wearing's picture

I wonder how receptive the public would be to him if the mostly Tory/Blairite supporting media hadn't piled into him from the start. I assume the hostility from those quarters is a lot more to do with his (actually rather timid) attempts to move away from Blairism than it has to do with his leadership qualities. Efforts to caricature and diminish him (most laughably as "Red Ed") have been relentless. It must take effect after a while.

J Hill's picture

There really is no mystery. Ed Miliband is an intelligent thinker and probably a very able "policy wonk". But he is not a Prime Minister figure and he never will be. Labour's MPs know this, the country knows it too. Bring on Alastair Darling as stop-gap - he has guts, some degree of deficit credibility, and would be taken seriously.

Tom's picture

As a Labour supporter Im in 2 minds , I really want Ed to suceed as I think he would actually make a good PM primarily down to his mind , and he does seem to have vision , but its noithing but bad news stories or he just seems very anasthetised to everything and subsequently so do Labour , I do believe tthat a factor in this is the right wing press , who make out that David Cameron making a cup of tea is a sign of some type of churchillian strength . and yet starve Ed of any good oxygen , the mian issue in my eyes , is the shadow cabinet is very bereft of any real talent , and a new generation needs to come through if we are to have any chance of getting back into power.

Union Steve's picture

When are we going to realise that Ed was elected leader by the party democraticaly. He is the leader of our party fighting the media,the Coalition,vested intrest,Bankers and the neoliberal establishment.
He should have the loyalty of his own side. Unfortunatly we must add to the list of his foe's the Blairits, Progress,politicaly iliterate back benchers and his brother. It's us the democratic left that need to get our act together not the leader.

super huey's picture

I can't imagine Ed as a world leader not even in the EU. I can see him cowering in the corner following the sound of the flute that merkozy are playing.

Although the Veto Cameron exercised is kind of pointless it showed he has character, strength and the balls to say NO! something Blair and Brown did not do.

Like someone said here the shadow cabinet should be replaced with newbies but I just can't see who can step in.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets