Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read pieces from this morning's newspapers.

1. A far from triumphant end to the war in Iraq (Independent)

Iraq and the world are better off without Saddam, says this leading article. But the price paid was too high.

2. Be warned, America's withdrawal from Iraq heralds a world of instability (Guardian)

Our troops' presence is needed in this land that is far from secure, says John Bolton, who served as ambassador to the UN under George Bush.

3. Trial and Error (Times) (£)

This leading article says that the issue of detainees captured in Iraq and Afghanistan must be addressed.

4. The highs and lows of democracy (Financial Times)

Philip Stephen looks back at 2011, when tyrants have fallen, while elected leaders have been frozen in crisis.

5. The cause of this recession? Economic pundits ignoring history's voice (Guardian)

As long as factional interests like bankers or economists override common sense, there will be another crash, warns Simon Jenkins.

6. Enter Ed M, the Accidental Prime Minister (Times) (£)

Philip Collins explains how the ghosts of the Brussels summit could come back to haunt Cameron's Conservatives -- and the country.

7. Profit needn't be a dirty word when it comes to education (Daily Telegraph)

Michael Gove might have kept quiet about Breckland Free School, but it could be the start of something great, argues Fraser Nelson.

8. Death by strangling: the demise of state spending (Financial Times)

It is false that low taxes have spared the US from the European disease, writes Jeffrey Sachs.

9. You can't save troubled families on the cheap (Times) (£)

We know where the problems are, says Camila Batmanghelidjh. But Whitehall needs to do the psychological maths.

10. Will China's rulers listen to the voices of its downtrodden masses? (Daily Telegraph)

Jonathan Fenby writes that the protests in Wukan are a nightmare for the Communist rulers of a divided country.

Photo: Getty
Show Hide image

Like it or hate it, it doesn't matter: Brexit is happening, and we've got to make a success of it

It's time to stop complaining and start campaigning, says Stella Creasy.

A shortage of Marmite, arguments over exporting jam and angry Belgians. And that’s just this month.  As the Canadian trade deal stalls, and the government decides which cottage industry its will pick next as saviour for the nation, the British people are still no clearer getting an answer to what Brexit actually means. And they are also no clearer as to how they can have a say in how that question is answered.

To date there have been three stages to Brexit. The first was ideological: an ever-rising euroscepticism, rooted in a feeling that the costs the compromises working with others require were not comparable to the benefits. It oozed out, almost unnoticed, from its dormant home deep in the Labour left and the Tory right, stoked by Ukip to devastating effect.

The second stage was the campaign of that referendum itself: a focus on immigration over-riding a wider debate about free trade, and underpinned by the tempting and vague claim that, in an unstable, unfair world, control could be taken back. With any deal dependent on the agreement of twenty eight other countries, it has already proved a hollow victory.

For the last few months, these consequences of these two stages have dominated discussion, generating heat, but not light about what happens next. Neither has anything helped to bring back together those who feel their lives are increasingly at the mercy of a political and economic elite and those who fear Britain is retreating from being a world leader to a back water.

Little wonder the analogy most commonly and easily reached for by commentators has been that of a divorce. They speculate our coming separation from our EU partners is going to be messy, combative and rancorous. Trash talk from some - including those in charge of negotiating -  further feeds this perception. That’s why it is time for all sides to push onto Brexit part three: the practical stage. How and when is it actually going to happen?

A more constructive framework to use than marriage is one of a changing business, rather than a changing relationship. Whatever the solid economic benefits of EU membership, the British people decided the social and democratic costs had become too great. So now we must adapt.

Brexit should be as much about innovating in what we make and create as it is about seeking to renew our trading deals with the world. New products must be sought alongside new markets. This doesn’t have to mean cutting corners or cutting jobs, but it does mean being prepared to learn new skills and invest in helping those in industries that are struggling to make this leap to move on. The UK has an incredible and varied set of services and products to offer the world, but will need to focus on what we do well and uniquely here to thrive. This is easier said than done, but can also offer hope. Specialising and skilling up also means we can resist those who want us to jettison hard-won environmental and social protections as an alternative. 

Most accept such a transition will take time. But what is contested is that it will require openness. However, handing the public a done deal - however well mediated - will do little to address the division within our country. Ensuring the best deal in a way that can garner the public support it needs to work requires strong feedback channels. That is why transparency about the government's plans for Brexit is so important. Of course, a balance needs to be struck with the need to protect negotiating positions, but scrutiny by parliament- and by extension the public- will be vital. With so many differing factors at stake and choices to be made, MPs have to be able and willing to bring their constituents into the discussion not just about what Brexit actually entails, but also what kind of country Britain will be during and after the result - and their role in making it happen. 

Those who want to claim the engagement of parliament and the public undermines the referendum result are still in stages one and two of this debate, looking for someone to blame for past injustices, not building a better future for all. Our Marmite may be safe for the moment, but Brexit can’t remain a love it or hate it phenomenon. It’s time for everyone to get practical.