The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

News of the World reporter implicated in phone-hacking breaks his silence

Neville Thurlbeck alleges that senior News of the World executives kept James Murdoch in th

Neville Thurlbeck, the former News of the World reporter implicated in the phone-hacking scandal, has broken his silence. In a wide-ranging first-person piece for Press Gazette, Thurlbeck claims that the "for Neville" email frequently cited in the phone-hacking case was not, in fact, intended for him, and alleges that the News of the World ignored a dossier of evidence that he compiled to prove his innocence and pinpoint the culprit.

Thurlbeck was arrested in April on suspicion of conspiring to intercept voicemail messages. He was sacked in September and is currently pursuing a claim for unfair dismissal against News International.

On the "for Neville" email:

Suddenly, I was fighting for my professional life. The money meant nothing. My reputation meant everything.

At that one-hour meeting with Tom Crone and Colin Myler, I gave them a substantial amount of evidence which satisfied them that I was not the guilty party. And that others were.

Many openly speculated how I had managed to keep my job for so long afterwards. That is why.

I followed this up with a lengthy memo on Wednesday 15 July and handed it to Myler and an ashen-faced Crone, who noted testily: "So you are putting this in writing!"

On Sunday, 19 July, I tracked down Ross Hall in Peru, the reporter who had made the transcript on the orders of an executive..

I taped the call and it exonerated me and incriminated the culprit.

On where the blame lies:

Senior management at the News of the World missed every opportunity to root out the problem and exonerate me.

...

But most significant of all, by depriving James Murdoch of the dossier, he was made to sit in front of the CMS Committee and face the damning allegation that he was guilty of "Wilfull blindness".

Far from being blind, James Murdoch had been given nothing to see.

...

Do I believe James Murdoch when he says he was never informed of the 'transcript for Neville' email? I do.

The full piece is available to read at Press Gazette.

 

7 comments

china smartphos's picture

do you use smartphones ? do you ever use china smartphones good things

Nilsey105's picture

Its time for people to leave matters in the hands of the lady at Scotland Yard who is heading the investigation.
The Commons select committees are a waste of time and space. Even Levinson has had to back off from naming names for fear of creating an excuse for future prosecution of those likely to be in such a position.

Nilsey105's picture

swatantra nandanwar
16 November 2011 at 13:16
I've got a feeling that Neville is telling the truth and James and Rebekah will be cleared.

Looks like your on first name terms with these parasites.

Des Demona's picture

I wouldn't trust this guy as far as I could throw him. How much do you think Murdoch will settle his unfair dismissal claim for now? Probably a lot more, after this fluff piece.

Besides - whether James Murdoch saw the 'For Neville' email or not is irrelevant. (by the way if it wasn't For Neville then who?)

There was also legal advice, a massive out of court payment made and the testimony of Crone that he told Murdoch everything.

JohnBaxendale's picture

'Ashen-faced' - I like that. Was he 'tight-lipped' too?

I thought the point was there weren't any other Nevilles at the NoW?

mcquade's picture

Spot the man fishing for a hefty pay-off from News International in exchange for backing James Murdoch and dropping his unfair dismissal case. What he can't get round though is Murdoch's preternatural lack of curiosity over the huge settlement cheques he was signing.

swatantra's picture

I've got a feeling that Neville is telling the truth and James and Rebekah will be cleared.
Neville may have been rewarded heftily by NI but I doubt if he would want to perjure himself knowing the full consequences of being found out.
So Crone and Meyer need to be recalled and swear on oath that they are telling the truth.

Latest tweets