Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Will Osborne cut fuel tax again?

Ministers consider scrapping 3p rise in fuel duty after 110,000 sign e-petition.

"We have put fuel into the tank of the British economy," declared George Osborne with a flourish in his last Budget speech as he abolished the fuel duty escalator - which adds an extra penny on top of inflation - and cut fuel duty by 1p. But that wasn't enough to appease the motorists' lobby. After all, Osborne's "fuel tax cut" wasn't really a cut at all. The VAT rise added 3p to the cost of a litre and fuel duty is still due to rise by a further 3p a litre in January, meaning an extra £1.50 to fill an average car or an extra £38 a year, and again in August. In view of this, an e-petition calling for further action to reduce petrol prices (submitted by the Conservative MP Robert Halfon) has been signed by 111,692 people and the resultant parliamentary motion will be debated for three hours in the Commons today.

The motion has been signed by over 100 MPs, including 83 Tories, and already there are signs that the government is prepared to give way. The Times (£) reports that David Cameron is considering scrapping the planned 3p rise and that even the green-minded Lib Dems are prepared to support him. The coalition is evidently concerned about rising pump prices and with good reason. Polling shows that the "cost of petrol" is among voters' biggest concerns (just behind electricity and gas prices) and as PoliticalBetting's Mike Smithson has noted before, there is a telling correlation between rising prices and falling support for the governing party. The only time that William Hague led Tony Blair in the polls was during the fuel protests of 2000. Labour's increasingly sharp attack on the cost of living - it is calling for the government to reverse January's VAT rise to reduce prices - means that Cameron and Osborne must be seen to offer relief.

The argument that any spare cash should be used to reduce tax on motorists rather than, say, limit cuts to Sure Start, is unpersuasive. Scrapping the 3p rise would cost the Treasury around £1.5bn. But with petrol more highly taxed in Britain than in almost any other country, the government has a case to answer. Of the current average pump price of 133.74p a litre, 58.95p is fuel duty and 22.29p is VAT - a de facto tax rate of 154.74 per cent.

Another cut in fuel duty would further undermine the government's claim to be "the greenest ever" and discredit Osborne's insistence that the "cupboard is bare". But the Chancellor, ever the political schemer, will still be tempted to announce another populist tax cut when he delivers his growth review on 29 November.

Tags: George Osborne

10 comments

Mario's picture

Scrapping the 3p rise on petrol duty is a disgusting idea. The claim that petrol prices are people's biggest concern is incommensurable with the rise of the SUV as the suburban commuter's standard car, which uses twice as much petrol as normal cars.
There are numerous ways to reduce petrol costs, reduce your speed, don't wait at the roadside idling for 15 minutes, stop accelerating between speed bumps or towards red traffic lights etc. If the government promoted proper driving, it would achieve more than by cutting 3p off the tax.
Raising the price for petrol as well as revolutionising car tax so that you pay per mile driven at any one time rather than a flat rate per year are the only ways to reduce congestion, save the environment and steer our society towards more sustainable travel by walking, cycling and using public transport.
The difference between the entire cost each road user causes to the state (road repairs, maintenance, accident costs to the NHS etc) and what he or she actually pays in tax is about £2 million, so driving can still be called a pretty good deal and there is a lot of leeway to make people realise how unsustainable constant car use actually is.

swatantra nandanwar's picture

Super, Mario. Well said!
We also need to encourage the use of the electric car and cycling in towns.
Cutting the duty on fuel simply puts more petrol into the tanks of 4x4's.

Des Demona's picture

I use public transport all the time. And it sucks! It really does annoy me when these eco warrior types bang on about pricing motorists off the road and on to public transport.

Ever tried getting from South East London to Sevenoaks and back on a Sunday?

Mario's picture

Yes, the electric car is the future of close-range car use and should be encouraged while we need more research on making batteries cheaper and longer-lasting.

I agree with you Des that public transport does have problems in this country, which is partly why so many people resort to cars. It is not enough to make car use more expensive without improving public transport. It needs to be made cheaper, more reliable and more convenient to use. Increase Sunday services. Convert more 2x2 lane roads into bus lanes. Improve traffic light priority for buses. More ticket types need to be introduced (weekly, monthly, annual, school kid ticket, weekend only, weekdays only etc etc as in many other countries). Improving public transport is not expensive at all compared to spending billions on keeping road tax low.

madasbalooons's picture

What's the point of having a petition when absolutely nothing will be done about it, what a waste of time and money, another Tory con trick.

representingthemambo's picture

I imagine that Cameron would like to but circumstances may stop him. Firstly he will look weak. Secondly he may need the money as the economy is still tanking.
That said, there are some powerful lobby groups behind the campaign, as shown in the Guardian today.

I have written a fairly amateurish contribution to the debate too:

http://representingthemambo.wordpress.com/2011/11/15/the-fuel-tax-e-peti...

swatantra nandanwar's picture

The 'green' argument is not to cut the fuel duty. We have to start somewhere.
Anyway, there is a supermarket battle going on which will cut the price petrol.

Mark Allan's picture

No,they won't cut duty. They'll just tell us to go online and find the cheap prices in your area like they did with the gas and electricity!

swatantra nandanwar's picture

Its an opportunity for the public to let off steam, and for MPs to 'show that they care', but, imagine a country ruled by petitions. Would that amount to a dictatorship of the prolertariat?

Stu's picture

Either scrap it or cut by 2p at the very least would be nice.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets