Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Oliver Letwin and the strange case of the dumped papers

Cabinet Office minister caught disposing of government papers in St James's Park bin.

After the week the government has had (the Liam Fox imbroglio, terrible unemployment figures), "cabinet minister caught throwing away secret papers in public bins" is not the sort of headline David Cameron wants to wake up to. The culprit is the gaffe-prone Oliver Letwin, who was seen disposing of private documents in a St James's Park bin. The Daily Mirror has the full story and the glorious pictures.

The paper reports that Cameron's Gandalf "was seen on five separate days throwing away sensitive correspondence on terrorism, national security and constituents' private details." In total, the Cabinet Office Minister disposed of more than 100 papers, including one said to describe how intelligence chiefs "failed to get the truth" on UK involvement in terrorist interrogations. A spokesman for Letwin has responded by insisting that the papers did not contain any sensitive material.

"Oliver Letwin does some of his parliamentary and constituency correspondence in the park before going to work, and sometimes disposes of copies of letters there. They are not documents of a sensitive nature," he said.

But Labour has already gone on the attack. In a letter to the outgoing cabinet secretary, Gus O'Donnell, Michael Dugher, Letwin's shadow, wrote:

Can you ensure that the Cabinet Office will begin an investigation, as a matter of urgency, to ascertain the classification of the discarded documents, how many have been discarded in this manner and whether the strict procedures for the disposal of Government documents has been breached.

I am sure you will agree that Ministers have a duty to follow proper procedures and lead by example. This has clearly not happened in the case of Mr Letwin. As you are aware, Civil Servants are subject to disciplinary procedures if the proper processes are not adhered to. It cannot be that there is one rule for Ministers and another for everyone else.

I would be grateful if you could investigate these matters as soon as possible and I look forward to hearing from you.

Tags: Oliver Letwin

21 comments

carrierhyd's picture

Good old Ollie!!
Well, why should anyone be surprised! This is just the arrogant, condescending attitude I expect from the Tories. Made me laugh though, especially the cold war spies comment! teehee

howard jackson's picture

As an ex civil servant I can confirm that no departmental papers should be dumped in a bin. There are procedures and all papers are written by someone to someone ie not to people walking past the bin. It does not matter whether the material is sensitive. There is also the significant issue of shredding and observing green practices. If this had been a civil servant he would be sacked.

Lizalec's picture

The reality is that Letwin was simply sitting in the park on a few warm days and enjoying the sunshine whilst working, rather than working from his office a stones throw away. None of the items in question were protectively marked (even at the lowest level of restricted) so he was under no obligation to shred them (thou common sense might have warranted it to prevent this sort of thing occuring). There is nothing particularly strange about Letwin throwing away a few pieces of written correpondence he had already read and digested.
It might be worth adding that it is actually an offence under the theft act (theft by finding) to remove items discarded in a public bin prior to the bin being officially emptied by the bin owner/refuse collection service. Perhaps the journalist that took them, specifically to write a story that was in no way in the public interest and written purely to undermine the government in favour of that paper's political stance, should be arrested and charged with this offence. The Mirror has also lied and claimed the papers were marked secret, which is a total fallacy.. so a report to the Press Complaints Commission is in order. It is sad times that section 73 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 abolished seditious libel, as I would like to see more of these gutter press journalists tried for publishing lies about individual politicians.

roy's picture

just another day at the al fresco office...huh...keep britain tidy..with oliver bloody letterbin...my god no wonder this country going to the dogs..huh..

Arturo Bandini's picture

This is in no way funny. When will this bunch of incompetents be brought to account?

A PM who regularly misleads the House due to his difficulty with facts and details, a Chancellor who has no understanding of economics, a defence ministers whose actions are indefensible, and a cabinet office minister who can't be trusted with official documents.

No wonder Ken Clarke seems embarrassed to be associated with these amateurs.

BGP's picture

Saying this is ok as the papers did not have an HMG protective marking (however low) is an absolute red herring. Any info pertaining to deliberations on these issues or a consituents details is by definition sensitive. Civil Servants now have mandatory NSG training on handling information which they've to pass annually. If they did this it would absolutely be classed as gross misconduct and they'd be very lucky to keep their job and not be prosecuted.

tuttifrutti's picture

@ Lizalec
The article states that the documents contained constituents'private details. Given your comments you would presumably be comfortable with your private details being left in a bin like this? And I assume that Lizalec is also your real name because you would be happy about this.

Pat's picture

Presumably the constituency correspondence had constituent's details on them - in which case there may be a case to answer under the Data Protection Act. If I was a constituent who wrote to Letwin, I would be asking serious questions of his constituency office at the moment.

At the very least, he should be suspended until the case is investigated thoroughly, as a civil servant would be.

GeorgeMouse's picture

Most people endeavour to keep their private data secret - Letwin is an ignorant moron if he thinks "it's not classified so anyone can read it". If he is so ignorant of basic security, it says a lot about Cabinet Ministers being arrogant thickos!

Grahamgomeldon's picture

It's a worry what this says about Cameron - it seems there is nothing a right-wing Tory can do to warrant dismissal or even censure. The Cat Lady can openly lie, and Cameron goes for Clarke instead. Fox misleads parliament, but that's fine by Cameron. Letwin goes loopy, but Cameron's not concerned. Not a good day for "Dave" - we also have him attempting a sordid little whitewash over the Finucane killing. This man is far too light-weight and amoral to be the prime minister of this country - or any country.

Julian Gower's picture

Oliver Letwin's personality more or less sums up the Cameron 'government', people who really don't have a holistic picture of society in Britain, and think in disjointed 'sets of beliefs' wherein anything that anything that promotes commercial interests is favoured. Such people, as illustrated by Letwin's carelessness, really aren't responsible enough to be governing our country. It's a shame so many of the electorate don't realise this.

Mrs,M L Bonwick-Jones's picture

The Gutter press hanging around bins again collecting rubbish it is lucky they didnot do that during Labour time, there would never have been enough vans to collect the rubbish! is that even legal, and i wonder what Lord Leveson will think considering he is investigating that particular paper for phone Hacking!

M Clarke's picture

Public litter bins are not intended for office waste, Mr Letwin should, at the very least, be fined for misusing this facility.

1R4M's picture

I agree with @Kevin

there something suspicious going on here
mb he was trying to pass on info, and he'd planned with someone over the phone to come n collect them...

that or ive been watching too man spy movies

larkforsure's picture

[ SOS ] Complaint about Human Rights Violations by IBM China on Centennial

Please Google:

Tragedy of Labor Rights Repression in IBM China
or
How Much IBM Can Get Away with is the Responsibility of the Media
or
IBM detained mother of ex-employee on the day of centennial

Tom Pride's picture

The explanation's simple. He's a Russian spy:
http://tompride.wordpress.com/2011/10/14/oliver-letvin-a-russian-spy/

stuart's picture

i think he done it on purpose hoping these letters would be found by the press, but did not know he was being tailed by the daily mirror,,remember when new labour was in power,,all these files that went missing from the mod,,health service,security forces ended up been found left on trains and found in bins and or lying by some wall in the street,,this was no accident,but what the motive is wellwho knows..a true mystery

swatantra nandanwar's picture

The Govt seems to be obsessed with bins. We've had Pickles ahd his weekly collections; then Theresa the Cat Lady in the Sin Bin and now Ollie bin Letwin using St James Park as his private office binning his constituents correspondence. Where will it stop? Dave bin Cameron must get a grip before the whole lot goes down the tube along with Liam bin Fox.

Livers's picture

Does he have half a brain?

What a moron.

Kevin's picture

Umm! St James's Park? Where Cold War spies used to meet or use the waste paper baskets for drops? What the devil was he thinking of? Or elese, what the devil was he up to? And did anyone think to wait to see if anyone - other than journalists - came along to pick up the papers?

Guy Debored's picture

Beautiful.
Laugh out loud funny.
The only thing you can ever trust Tories with is their capacity duplicity.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets