In search of the "Responsibility Society"
Can we give substance to Ed Miliband's vision?
By Marc Stears Published 02 October 2011 11:54
Two events defined this summer's politics. The shocking revelations of phone hacking at News International and the riots in English cities. The Labour leader, Ed Miliband, has tried relentlessly to connect the two, arguing that both reveal a cuture of social irresponsibility that neither the current government nor their New Labour predecessors have done anything near enough to challenge. Britain needs a new ethic, Miliband has argued, one focused on mutual responsibility and shared concern, and the only way it can be fostered is through a politics that is not afraid to tackle the vast powers of vested interest.
Ed Miliband is surely right in essence. But, as he is only too aware, both his diagnosis and his prescribed remedy requires more detailed development if it is to provide British left politics with a genuinely new direction. In my essay for the IPPR, "Everyday Democracy: Taking the Centre-Left Beyond State and Market", I aim to start this development.
We need to begin by understanding the root problem that Miliband is striving to identify. This problem lies, I believe, in the dominance of an overly "transactional" mindset in British society. Too many of us, in too many settings, look on our fellow citizens either as problems to be avoided or as instruments to our own gain. Big businesses talk about their workforce as "human resources". Civil servants in Whitehall prepare projects and "initiatives" with no attempt to consult with the people their plans will affect. Even in our families, the pressures and stresses of work sometimes make us look at our partners, parents and children more as things to be managed rather than people to be treasured.
It is this mindset that rips at the core of our society. Sometimes, it can make us aggressive and excessively independent, believing that we owe nothing to our neighbours, co-workers or families. In this way, we pursue our own good relentlessly and ruthlessly. At other times, it can make us feel isolated and vulnerable, with no-one to turn to in times of need, no network of support to draw on. Loneliness is already closely related to the dramatic rise in chronic mental health problems across our society.
The only effective response to this mindset is the development of new cross-community relationships in our everyday lives. That is the way that people can begin to deepen an ethic of mutual responsibility that challenges the transactional outlook. Such relationships themselves will only emerge when we radically expand the opportunities we have to interact with each other in a constructive way, in the workplace, our communities and in our own homes. That means protecting and enriching our common spaces, providing people with the living wages they need to be able to spend time with their families and friends, and transforming our public services so that they draw the users and producers of services into continual dialogue with each other.
This is the reason that so many centre-left politicians, including Miliband himself, were so engaged by the academic arguments of so-called Blue Labour earlier this year. Its appeal for Miliband is not just intellectual, though. It also lies in the fact that this is the kind of politics that he actually lives. I have known Ed for over twenty years, and I know that he is never happier than when he is building connections between people from all walks of life, drawing diverse people together into a politics of the common good.
However crucial his personal role, Ed Miliband did not invent this kind of politics. It has long roots in the Labour tradition, and in aspects of the liberal and conservative traditions too. The key now is to draw intelligently from those historic predecessors, while not giving in to a nostalgic vision of the past. What the centre-left desperately needs, therefore, is a resolutely modern account of how an everyday relational politics can be built. It needs, in other words, policies that are immediately appropriate for our current conditions but which challenge not reinforce the transactional spirit of the age. That is what New Labour failed to find. That is what I try to present in the essay. Argument will no doubt rage about individual suggestions, but it is increasingly clear that this is the agenda that brings new focus to centre-left thinking in Britain today.
Marc Stears is Visiting Fellow at IPPR and Professor of Political Theory at Oxford.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















9 comments
Hey Zeros - would you like to expand your critique, or am I right in thinking you have nothing valuable to add to any debate so instead resort to cheap, unfunny, pun-based insults?
It wasn't a pun. I genuinely thought the wrong word was used because you can't really say the big society is laudable - so I assumed the luddite wasn't a fan of Ed either. So far as I can see the big society was just buzz-phrase intended to make the Tories look like visionaries. It is up there with 'We will do good things' which I distinctly remember hearing in one of Cameron's speeches. As usual it went unchallenged, probably because the media was 'getting behind him' - and we know what that means. What 'good things?' Anyway, this week will be interesting. I will be looking out for the big society, and for substance. Also for Tories blaming Europe, or America, or Gordon Brown - anyone but themselves.
High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights. http://blogs.ft.com/westminster/2011/09/eds-broad-sweep-lacks-detailed-p...
We have just written an article on our blog discussing Ed Miliband's recent performance and policy announcements! You can probably guess the content of it by the slightly tongue and cheek title of it 'Dead Ed; Is the Labour leader doomed?' Have a read and let us know what you think http://thestarr-bl...lready-doomed.html
We have just written an article on our blog discussing Ed Miliband's recent performance and policy announcements! You can probably guess the content of it by the slightly tongue and cheek title of it 'Dead Ed; Is the Labour leader doomed?' Have a read and let us know what you think http://thestarr-blog.blogspot.com/2011/09/dead-ed-is-labour-leader-alrea...
I mean laudable, if we didn't end this sectarian class-war nonsense we will all be losers. Zeros there's nothing worse in politics than political-dogma. We should all work for the commom good.
We are in a period of class conflict and as the economic climate worsens so will the conflict. Our politicians and the media have just got their heads stuck in the sand.
The 'Responsible Society' starts in early years in mixed community comprehensive multicutural schools, children understanding and working together, co-operatively with mutual respect, with other children. If they haven't learned responsibility by the age of 11, and the difference between right and wrong, then its too late.
Ed Miliband's vision is laudable, but so is David Cameron's big society. These two men have much in common. The financial tsunami heading our way is now unavoidable. We can no longer avoid the coming financial meltdown, and neither can we afford party politicking and political point scoring. We most now develop a collective approach to the coming economic crisis, because if we don't.. We will all sink in this coming financial tsunami?
"Ed Miliband's vision is laudable..."
You mean laughable surely?