Werritty "paid to act as Fox's adviser" by wealthy donors

New allegations could be particularly damaging if found to be true.

How many days on the front pages does it take before a politician's career is over? Liam Fox has been weathering the storm so far, but allegations made today will be particularly damaging, if they are proved true.

The BBC is reporting that an anonymous "wealthy backer" of the Defence Secretary has admitted that he and several others raised money to pay for Adam Werritty to act as Fox's adviser.

According to the BBC's political editor, Nick Robinson, this person said that the group of donors shared Fox's ideological perspective. The source claimed that although the group did not have specific defence interests, they paid Werritty because he could be trusted to encourage support for Eurosceptic, pro-American and pro-Israeli policies -- unlike civil servants.

To an extent, this account conforms to that given by Werritty; that his 18 trips abroad were funded by ideologically sympathetic philanthropists. The Guardian reports that Werritty has admitted to the inquiry that he may have "unintentionally misled" some business associates about his relationship with Fox, allowing them to think he was an official aide.

So, it appears that this group of wealthy backers existed and funded Werritty. The key question is how much Fox knew. If the donors were explicitly paying Werritty to act as Fox's adviser, as the BBC's report implies, it will be increasingly difficult for Fox to continue to deny all knowledge of impropriety.

Having an adviser paid for by undeclared donors is almost certainly a breach of the ministerial code and so if this allegation is found to be true, it would be difficult for Fox to continue in his role.


Samira Shackle is a freelance journalist, who tweets @samirashackle. She was formerly a staff writer for the New Statesman.

Show Hide image

It's Gary Lineker 1, the Sun 0

The football hero has found himself at the heart of a Twitter storm over the refugee children debate.

The Mole wonders what sort of topsy-turvy universe we now live in where Gary Lineker is suddenly being called a “political activist” by a Conservative MP? Our favourite big-eared football pundit has found himself in a war of words with the Sun newspaper after wading into the controversy over the age of the refugee children granted entry into Britain from Calais.

Pictures published earlier this week in the right-wing press prompted speculation over the migrants' “true age”, and a Tory MP even went as far as suggesting that these children should have their age verified by dental X-rays. All of which leaves your poor Mole with a deeply furrowed brow. But luckily the British Dental Association was on hand to condemn the idea as unethical, inaccurate and inappropriate. Phew. Thank God for dentists.

Back to old Big Ears, sorry, Saint Gary, who on Wednesday tweeted his outrage over the Murdoch-owned newspaper’s scaremongering coverage of the story. He smacked down the ex-English Defence League leader, Tommy Robinson, in a single tweet, calling him a “racist idiot”, and went on to defend his right to express his opinions freely on his feed.

The Sun hit back in traditional form, calling for Lineker to be ousted from his job as host of the BBC’s Match of the Day. The headline they chose? “Out on his ears”, of course, referring to the sporting hero’s most notable assets. In the article, the tabloid lays into Lineker, branding him a “leftie luvvie” and “jug-eared”. The article attacked him for describing those querying the age of the young migrants as “hideously racist” and suggested he had breached BBC guidelines on impartiality.

All of which has prompted calls for a boycott of the Sun and an outpouring of support for Lineker on Twitter. His fellow football hero Stan Collymore waded in, tweeting that he was on “Team Lineker”. Leading the charge against the Murdoch-owned title was the close ally of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and former Channel 4 News economics editor, Paul Mason, who tweeted:

Lineker, who is not accustomed to finding himself at the centre of such highly politicised arguments on social media, responded with typical good humour, saying he had received a bit of a “spanking”.

All of which leaves the Mole with renewed respect for Lineker and an uncharacteristic desire to watch this weekend’s Match of the Day to see if any trace of his new activist persona might surface.


I'm a mole, innit.