The failed culture of our capitalism
Responsible capitalism can be innovative and profitable. Britain's businesses must lead the change.
By Marc Stears Published 20 October 2011 18:03
Almost everyone is suddenly talking about the culture of capitalism. It is not just those camped out at St Paul's who are worried about the behaviour of the corporate elite. The right wing press is hounding the big six energy companies. Westminster insiders are turning on industry lobbyists. Even Ed Balls has found a moral voice.
Far more comfortable talking about systems than values, the Shadow Chancellor has now laid the blame of Britain's economic woes on a culture of irresponsibility. It is a message "coming from people up and down the country", Balls told the Evening Standard recently. "They want the economy to be based on proper standards."
For some critics, this talk of culture and standards agenda is a moralizing distraction. Our focus, these more traditional voices argue, should be on the structural shortcomings of our economy; not on its culture. It is only once we have tackled youth unemployment and the squeeze on living standards that we should turn our attention to business ethics.
But that is to make a crucial mistake, for it was the failed culture of our capitalism that helped to get us into our economic mess in the first place. Understanding and improving that culture is not a distraction. It is central to working out how we get out of the crisis.
The relationship between culture and economics is straightforward. It is the culture of "grab-all-you-can" that encourages CEOs to press for salary packages that far outstrip their contribution. It is the culture of "profit-by-any-means" that leads some unscrupulous employers to lay off their workforce at the earliest opportunity. It is the culture of "care-only-for-the short-run" that starves Britain's businesses of the investment they needed to compete globally. It was all of these cultural failings combined that brought us the crash of 2008 and its devastating consequences.
Just as there are cultural causes of our economic malaise, so there are cultural solutions, too. We don't need to occupy public squares or wait until Labour is back in government. We can play our part right away by quietly insisting that we will not stand for the destructive irresponsibility that has blighted parts of our economy for far too long. As the Management Professor Harry Mintzberg says, it is up to all of us to show that the economic culture of the "short run has run out."
Crucially, that goes for those of us in business at least as much for the rest of the public. We have some truly great firms in Britain. We have imaginative entrepreneurs and committed workforces. These businesses already have a clear interest in rejecting the kind of practices that have led to economic ruin. More importantly, they increasingly realise how innovative, dynamic and profitable a more responsible capitalism can be.
To create a sustainable economic recovery, the culture of Britain's businesses must change. That much is already clear. We need also to acknowledge that it is business itself that will change it.
Marc Stears is Professor of Political Theory at the University of Oxford and a Visiting Fellow of the Institute for Public Policy Research.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















19 comments
I wish Luddite would understand, Globalisation has eroded the nation state.
Osborne has point blank refused to get tough with the banks, sighting the need for " Worldwide Agreement " on banking regulation.
Luddite has no problem handing sovereignty over to Beijing and Washington when it comes to banking reform.
As usually, the deluded Right ignores the WTO, a organisation which is unelected, but can make decisions over trade without recourse for the UK Parliament.
The problem with both unregulated capitalism and statist socialism is they both give too much power to too few people. And power sadly ALWAYS corrupts, ask any commune. Oo what to do...
Schumpeter defined "creative destruction" as the driving force of capitalism. Marc Stears has not defined what "responsible capitalism" might be. Too much wishful thinking, and lack of accurate parameters spring to mind.
I got this burning belief, in salvation and love. This notion may be naive. But when push comes to shove, I will till this ground.
Now, get rid of the Halloween spam.
"Responsible vigilantes can lower crime and the cost of policing. Britain's vigilantes must lead the change."
What's this shabby blog on about? We haven't even had any proper capitalism yet, just a load of huge taxes, state interference and massive public spending. The percentage of GDP spent by the state on state stuff is higher than China, and they're supposed to be the communists! Fact!
@swatantra nandanwar
You may know a lot about business but you know nothing about education.
You wrote:
"Unfortunately most of the protestors have very little idea about how business works. An excellent way to learn would be for them to set up small businesses and try and make a goof it."
Establishing a small business is just about the hardest thing you can do. The majority fail within five years. Many don't even make it through the first year.
Your project would just teach them how small businesses fail.
The way to teach people about about how business works is to put them in charge of a big business.
Men are perhaps not mature enough for capitalism to work efficiently.
what i'd like to see is the UK develop leading edge businesses especially in the technology sector, at the moment we are finding ireland is the king of technology start-ups in europe, google, twitter, facebook have chosen ireland - this helps create a "cluster" where like minded businesses develop, we must not let others take the crown.
At the same time we need to look at green/high tech materials areas and look to develop businesses that currently setup in the far east. The far east does not have to be the number one choice for technology manufacturing. In addition we need to look at waiving fees for engineering graduates (but keep fees for arty farty courses), this will help improve incentives for the brightest to attend those courses and develop a larger talent pool (currently china and india are churning armies of these types of graduates - the types that future growth areas will rely on).
We also need to address the balance between destructive admin-job style gov't spend and genuine growth enhancing infrastructure spend, all these things will increase the health of the UK economy.
Unfortunately most of the protestors have very little idea about how business works. An excellent way to learn would be for them to set up small businesses and try and make a goof it. Its a bit more difficult than mos of them would imagine.
"Responsible capitalism can be innovative and profitable. Britain's businesses must lead the change". Of course it can, but first we must withdraw from Europe.
@swatantra: How do you know this to be the case? Have you spoken to any of them and conducted some sort of straw poll? Making unsupported assertions adds nothing to the debate.
@Luddite: Another wild assertion which is not backed up by any factual evidence. How EXACTLY would withdrawal from the EU (I assume this is what you actually mean since it would be impossible to perform a continental drift) shift a change in business culture? What we see in terms of UK business culture was, surely, ever thus? There was a capitalist culture here for over a century before the mere idea of the EEC/EU.
The greed culture is not limited to business. Look the salary inflation in the highest echelons of the pulic sector. How is it possible that so many public sector officials are paid more than those in Government? I do not see the need for Local Authority Chief Executives to be paid anywhere near a hundred grand. Are senior doctors worth the same sort of sum? Probably not. The entire culture of remuneration in the UK needs to be addressed, and this is on a day when Tory councillors in Cambridge were found to have voted themselves 25% increases in their expenses while they make hundreds of staff redundant.
There's nothing immoral about the pursuit of profit: it's amoral, and rightly so. Profit can only be made by selling someone something that they want or need-i.e., a mutually beneficial exchange.
The problem with capitalism in this country-and probably globally-is that big corporations have conspired amongst themselves to form what are effectively cartels, by buying access to and influence over politicians. End that, and you'll decrease the lifespan of ineffective enterprises and let new businesses appear to take their places. Of course, the best way to end that would be to deregulate and decrease the power of the state. But what politicians would have the character to diminish their own status?
As for redundancy...it's hard, but that's the way it goes. I've been made redundant before: I didn't like it, but I was realistic enough to know that my employer wasn't going to do me a favour and keep me on. Why would it? All I'd have been doing would be making my colleagues' positions less secure by sucking resources out of the organisation. Make it easier for businesses to be born, to thrive and to die, and the problem will be solved. If someone can't find work, then they should be supported by social security until they can. But they shouldn't be left kicking their heels in a non-job to avoid unemployment.
Twaddle. This method will still see the majority of wealth being siphoned off to a minority. "Responsible capitalism" means that those currently in control of finance and "business" give as little as they possibly can to the "99%" to shut them up and to preserve the power for the "1%".
@swatantra nandanwar - most of the people on the protest can see enough of how business does not work. To believe that the reason that people are protesting is because they don't know enough about how to manage a company is to neglect the fact that a great deal of them want nothing to do with capitalist business structures anymore at all. Seemingly you believe that the way things currently are is the only way things can be.
Protest groups can perhaps concenrate on forcing business, particularly big business, to accept more 'corporate social responsibility'. To deny big business exists, is frankly living in gagaland. If they want to cut themselves off, then they could always go away and live in a commune.
That's right, just as capitalism is on the run up you pop to try to breath a little more life into it. Socialists believe capitalism is something we move on from, not prop up. What is wrong with the NS?
David: You can't achieve f**k-all if you don't control your own destiny..
Yea, right, it's the culture, not capitalism. or that's what most people in the upper class would like us to think anyway.
George Osborne’s a genius. He's managed to do what none of his Tory predecessors managed to do. They believed high unemployment was a price worth paying for low inflation.
Osborne on the other hand has managed to achieve the difficult balancing act of having both high inflation and high unemployment at the same time.
And zero growth. And higher taxes.
Brilliant.
http://tompride.wordpress.com/2011/10/18/osborne%E2%80%99s-inflated-clai...