Where next for Labour and immigration?
It is possible to address issues that drive hostility without demonising those who come to Britain.
By Jack Dromey Published 25 September 2011 13:15
In 1939, my father came from County Cork to dig roads. He searched for lodgings in Kilburn and Cricklewood, but it proved to be tough. House after house had signs outside which read "no Irish".
Britain has moved on immeasurably since then. Migration has been good for our country. Britain has been built on a history of successive waves of migration. Migrants have enriched our society and they are essential to the economy.
But last year, the message from the electorate on immigration proved to be deeply uncomfortable for Labour and its supporters. We should make no mistake, the strength of feeling about immigration is real. This is why a debate about immigration is so important.
That debate must take full account of the facts, and that means recognising that immigration has enriched Britain, leading to cultural diversity, economic growth, openness and prosperity. But it also means taking full account of objections, and not asserting that every objection to immigration is inherently racist.
In a review of the reasons for changing views on immigration, Liam Byrne referred to "research which shows workers on between £20-30,000 a year have faced huge forces in our economy, squeezing pay packets and the cost of living for at least five years. That's why so many are frustrated with welfare reform and immigration."
The worst impacts have fallen on people employed in low-growth sectors, such as construction, retail, hotels and catering, which employ around one-third of all UK workers. The association of all these industries with the employment of substantial numbers of migrants has allowed the message to take root that immigration is the cause of depressed wages and the lack of job security for many thousands of British workers.
The lack of affordable housing has also heightened sensitivity to immigration. But the housing shortage doesn't stem from immigrants taking great swathes of housing -- it is due to an overall lack of suitable affordable housing across the country. That shortage is something all the parties over the last 30 years have to take responsibility for. Under Labour, nearly 2m more homes were built, including half a million more affordable homes. But it wasn't enough, and we have to be honest that we didn't build, for example, enough council houses.
If Labour is serious about winning back those whose incomes have been squeezed, who worry about the security of their jobs and struggle to know where they will live, then Labour needs also to seriously address their concerns about immigration.
Lord Glasman, the guru of "Blue Labour" made an inauspicious start when he expressed his frustration with the difficulties Labour has had in accounting for its policies by suggesting that migration should be "frozen" in order to "put the people in this country first".
Yet Stephen Ladyman, the former MP for a Kent constituency where immigration was a big issue at the election, has cautioned against such a crude approach. For Ladyman, "Immigration is a necessary part of a vibrant economy and a decent society expects its immigration policy to also have a humanitarian aspect and we shouldn't be afraid to say so public."
This message was echoed by the Child Poverty Action Group's former director, Kate Green, now MP for Stretford and Urmston, who has stressed the importance of formulating immigration policies which are honestly set out to the public, frankly discussing "the trade-offs implicit in managing migration," which balance its positive effects in supporting a growing economy with the issues which genuinely concern ordinary citizens.
The government's strategy for driving down net migration, through its cap on numbers of migrants permitted under the Points-based Scheme, is patently failing. The public will look to Labour, and we will need to be ready to set out our vision for the future management of migration and the consequences of migration.
Labour will need to set out a positive case that demonstrates how well-managed migration can serve the UK in the fight back to growth and prosperity. We will need to show how we have learnt from our 13 years in government. We will need to address the key issues that drive hostility towards immigration including housing, stagnating wages, the increase of unskilled work, and workers rights.
And we must do all this without demonising the good men and women who come to Britain to enjoy a better life. Who help build Britain. Who have helped make Britain what it is today.
Jack Dromey MP is the chair of the all-party parliamentary group on migration, and shadow minister for communities and local government
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















31 comments
Jack Dromey ('Mr. Harman, to you!'), looks just like a Klingon.
Before left -wing MPs harp on about the 'benefits' of mass immigration...condider this:
HOW HAS MASS IMMIGRATION BENEFITTED THE WHITE WORKING CLASSES??
The continual Labour support for mass immigration is one reason why I will never vote for this party again!
The sheer mendacity and bare-faced cheek of senior Labour Party apparatchiks on the issue of 'immigration' never ceases to amaze and appall.
During the high-noon of Blairite bullshit, when they thought they could get away with murder, a secret plot was hatched (google 'Andrew Neather')to abolish such immigration controls as existed altogether, in accordance with neo-liberal values, and to flood Britain with immigrants.
This was a two-pronged policy aimed at destroying working class wages on one hand, and 'making britain more multicultural (ie majority non-British) on the other.
Now you get dipsh*ts like Dromey trying to 'play 'honest broker', because he knows the British public will never forgive Labour, and they're shafted.
All this tosser cares about is his cushy job.He couldn't give as shit about the workers, thhough he would kill them as soon as look at them if they harmed his precious immigrants.
" The public will look to Labour, and we will need to be ready to set out our vision for the future management of migration and the consequences of migration."
No the public will NOT look to labour , they had an open door policy and lied about it , nearly half of people in our capital city were not even born in the UK.
That 4 million RECENT immigrants just in london, go to any high street and there is no community cohesion with english clearly not spoken by the many immigrants who have settled.
Its to late , to many parts of our country dont feel English at all at the expense of the indegenous people.
This will only stoke problems in the future , we have regular marches by the EDL , increased ghettos , less civic participation, and without question we would not have had these riots before mass immigration. You just have to look where how it started.
Remember we would have a communial race war if the muslim man who's sons were killed asked for revenge!
At some point the immigrants have to look inward at the reaction they get and may be creating from their hosts.
This extends from colonialism, to Northern Island, to the British in Southern Spain to immigrants in England and London.
Though a feeling of an invasion and lost host cultures, will always cause issues, however much the immigrants integrate and represent a low crime group.
It's human nature!
There is an underlining principle that the tabloids seem not to understand, which is simply that trying to stifle competition of labour (ie. migrants) does nothing to benefit the country in the long run. We can already see that in the rising BRIC nations, migration is accepted, with knowledge that migration brings in talent and simultaneously tends to improve the economy through job creation and growth.
But I imagine that the real 'problem' is really more focused within communities and civic participation, particularly in places with a high population of the working classes, and here I imagine more institutions are needed to increase civic participation, looking toward multicultural models that exist in Canada, Singapore, Malaysia etc. The problem of course, is that the English have always tended to be very introverted, very individualist and very short term, which is why it will be difficult for any party, not just Labour, to 'solve' the immigration problem while pandering to the tabloid press and the reactionary classes who seem to believe that a return to the 1950's is the best solution.
For Liebores policy on immigration - just look to the French 'policy on arms' !
wow, what an amazingly written piece. It strikes me as highly balanced and encouraging, nearly 'a voice of truth' at the risk of sounding painfully cheesy
History will judge the last Labour government as the biggest traitors we have ever seen.
They opened the door hoping for votes without giving a damn about the long-term consequences.
@Lady J
"There is nothing like an article on immigration to bring out the racists."
Well it's people like you who fuel racism and are in fact responsible for it. You have nothing constructive to say in this debate rather than the tired old Marxist blanket condemnation of anyone even "discussing" immigration as racist.
It's people like you who are responsible for the pitiful state of the left in the UK today. You're no doubt someone who is benefiting under Cameron and who lives in an immigrant free area and therefore unaffected.
It's just as well because if Cameron does get on top of immigration he will rightly be able to exploit the fact and take enough working class voters with him to keep Labour out of office for a generation.
You can thank yourself for that, and people like you with your neo-fascist disdain for working class people, and contempt for them having any kind of reasonable debate amongst themselves about serious issues. You're pathetic.
Robert Taggart
France has the world's third highest expenditure on arms, behind the USA and China but ahead of the UK.
We certainly get the extremes from both sides of the arguement when this subject is raised. No one ever brings up the fact that we are full as a country.
When the world is competing for food supplies and people are going without food in poorer countries, we are an ever growing population.
We couldn't feed ourselves in WW2 and had to have rationing with a population of 48 million, now our population is 70 million and rising.
England is now in 6th place of the most densely populated countries and the Uk as a whole is in 17th, heaven help future generations, our hospitals and schools are creaking, our transport system falling to pieces and vast numbers can't find housing.
Time for all political parties to get their acts together, some hope!
"Migrants have enriched our society..."
HaHaHaHa - you're so funny.
Bertie: "a secret plot was hatched (google 'Andrew Neather')to abolish such immigration controls as existed altogether"
Whether or not there was a secret plot (so secret it's on Google?), the reality is that immigration controls got far tougher over the last 10 years or so. See my earlier post - I can't even live with my American partner without a large amount of hassle and expense. Thanks to the attitudes of people like you. Whilst people whinge about the drain of immigrants, the state is happy to take thousands of pounds of our money just for the "right" to get married, or to live together, as well as our taxes.
Though the odd thing is, I also hate Labour, for the complete opposite reason.
Jack Marxoid Dromey raised the the fact that the elecorate were concerned about immigration but then decided not to analyse any of the points. In other words British electorate are stupid but silver spoon champagne socialist lefties know better. We cant argue with the facts about immigtaion so lets lie or talk about principles and enrichment.
So Jack or any other anti english marxoid answer these points.
1/ We have a housing crisis- we need 3 million new homes. Who gets priority and where do we build/ England land total = 50,000 m2 not 500,000 m2
2/ Do we destroy our farmland to build new houses and allow food prices to rise. I know lefties have in the past instigated artificial famines but is it wise to rely on imports just because the left cant accept we are a tiny island.
3/ Hundreds of new schools and hospitals for migrants. Who will pay?
4/ Land Fill. Due to run out of space soon. How will the Uk cope with millions more migrants. Or do migrants not produce waste?
5/ Roads and infastructure. Already overcrowded. Maybe we can let people sit on the roofes of trains like in india. How enriching!
Of course Jack you could have just told the truth that your party deiberatley tried to change the population of the country by unleashing the biggest wave of mass immigration in our nations history, but that would be telling the truth now wouldnt it. Something Liebour cannot do.
Enjoy your champagne.
well said A cole
It is plain to see we have been betrayed by the labour party. Blair in particular is a criminal and i seriously beleive he should be prosecuted under the human rights act. The indigeonous people have been insidiously deceived by him and his kind. Whites have been shot, stabbed, robbed raped and every possible disgusting thing immaginable by immigrants and insulted and called racist if we have the audacity to complain. Blair and Browns complicity in unimaginable and irriversable crime is hard to take in. Good luck to the far right.
One good thing about migrants is they have shown up the problems we have with our own indigenous workforce.
In my business i come into contact with many foreign people particluarly from Eastern Europe who are not used to a system of welfare in their country & dont even consider not getting a job, they tend not to drink excessively or take drugs and generally get up every day and look for work from 9-5 till they inevitably get a job, most within a week or three at most.
I actually started believing the claims that 'there are no jobs' even during the boom years of 2000-2008, but have since learned there is a little more to the arguement regarding our army of dole moles then meets the eye. Welfare seems to create a serious dependency problem that is passed through the generations.
Labour would need to come up with some credible strategies to combat fecklessness as well as immigration, as its just as serious a bugbear with a lot of people in this country.
I dont see exactly what the major 'enrichment' is from mass immigration, increased social tension, overcrowding, pollution, and a squeeze on wages, ahh but the strategists of Labour believe immigrants will vote for Labour by majority..
We look forward to your private prosecution Larry.
Things have got massively harder for non-EU people to come to the UK over the last 10 years. Restricting the numbers of skilled workers, requiring extortionate visa fees, and introducing pathetic trivia tests that most UK citizens can't pass. The problem is that the Daily Mail readers see the immigration from within the EU, whine about that - but then the Government responds by making it even harder for non-EU people. And now to hear that Labour "got it wrong", because they weren't harsh enough! I despair.
Even for two people getting married - for all the talk of supporting families, couples have no right to live together, and must pay extortionate fees, jump through hoops, just for the privilege of living together. As a British citizen, where is my right to live with my partner? We're also told how we mustn't be a burden on the state - yet the state is happy to take our taxes, and thousands of pounds of our money in red tape fees. Personally I'd rather my taxes don't support xenophobic Daily Mail readers - can I have my taxes back, please?
Past Labour Governments acted to arrest the importation of a new working class whose members understood no English except commands, knew nothing about workers’ rights in this country, could be deported if they stepped out of line, and, since they had no affinity with any particular locality here, could be moved around at will.
They acted against the enforced bilingualism or multilingualism that transfers economic, social, cultural and political power to a bilingual or multilingual élite, to the exclusion of the English-speaking working class, black and white.
The Co-Chairman of Balanced Migration is a Labour MP, Frank Field. Participants in it include Ian Davidson, a leading Co-operative MP; Baroness Boothroyd; Lord Jordan, a veteran trade union leader; Lord Ahmed, a prominent Muslim peer; Ann Cryer, a former Socialist Campaign Group MP, the widow of another and the mother of a third; Hazhir Teimourian, a London-based Kurdish journalist; Peter Kilfoyle, who resigned from the Blair Government in order to act as its critical friend before opposing the invasion of Iraq; and Lord Skidelsky, a founding and finishing member of the SDP who went on to resign from the Conservative front bench in order to oppose the bombing of Kosovo, and whose latest book is entitled Keynes: The Return of the Master.
The No2EU – Yes To Democracy list was headed both in the East Midlands and in Yorkshire and the Humber by leaders of the Lindsey oil refinery workers.
The trade union closed shop prevented such abuses, as surely as it guaranteed to the Tory 40 to 45 per cent of the industrial working class a moderating influence on the selection of the Labour parliamentary candidates for the safe Labour constituencies in which they lived.
I just wish that Dromey - and his appalling wife - would go to Hell, or the nearest grammar school.
Tony Blair has now admitted that it was a deliberate policy of New Labour to open up the country to mass immigration and he succeeded with 5.5 million coming here during those 13 years, half of which were from outside the UK and so could have been controlled. Against the will of the people they have brought about the most profound and irreversible change in British society. I can't remember that being flagged on their manifesto at elections.
There is nothing like an article on immigration to bring out the racists.
What would Jack Dromey ever have to say about anything that would be of any interest. This is the usual socialist mishmash of blind assertion and misinformation. What possible good can an influz of Irish tinkers and Romanian gypsies do us?
what about the uncounted illegal immigrants whom just disappear into our society?
The lack of indigenious citizens who do not want to take up jobs they deem as beneath them that the immigrants take up?
A benefits system that easy to exploit which sends out a message that the UK is the land of opportunity?
There are so many things wrong with contribute to the issue that requires a massive reform of not only immigration policy other facets like welfare.
I'm afraid the Labour party yet again have no policies on paper, reject all forms of reform that are proposed. They are not credible.
Reforms will hurt but they are necessary or else we might as well have another Labour government for 5 years.
@ Hova: "We can already see that in the rising BRIC nations, migration is accepted, with knowledge that migration brings in talent and simultaneously tends to improve the economy through job creation and growth. "
------------------------------------
the migration in BRIC countries has mostly come from within those countries, not from outside. besides, if large scale immigration is so wonderful for economy and job growth, how do you explain that britain is facing serious economic problems at the time of highest levels of immigration since ww2?
@Dave C. French policy = 'Hands up' !
THE TREACHEROUS TONY BLAIR MUST BE THE MOST CONCEITED PATRONIZING DECEITFULL PERSON EVER. MASS IMMIGRATION WITHOUT EVEN ASKING OUR PERMISSION. THIS IS NOT DEMOCRACY THIS IS DICTATORSHIP WORTHY OF SADDAM OR GADDAFFI. BLAIR SHOULD ANSWER FOR HIS CRIMES
Lady J 26 September 2011 at 00:40 "There is nothing like an article on immigration to bring out the racists."
indeed! There is nothing like an article on immigration to bring out the hand wringing apologists, yelling "racist" at any discussion regarding immigration. People who live in a bubble constantly using stupid words like enrichment and vibrant to try to positively describe muslim ghettos and no-go areas within our cities. The sorts of people who think that areas where no one can speak English are richly diverse. Get out into the real world and have the debate, instead of hiding behind the word racist to stifle discussion in a matter where you have no argument.