The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Has Labour abandoned the fight against Gove's school reforms?

Westminster seems to have signed off on education reforms. But the grassroots haven't.

I have just had a chance properly to catch up with Andy Burnham's speech to the Labour conference and was struck by the line that:

Free schools and academies can embody the comprehensive ideal.

This doesn't seem to have been much noticed but it is a fairly clear indication that Labour will not pick a fight with Michael Gove on the question of local authority control over schools.

Shortly before Burnham spoke I chaired a fringe meeting on schools policy where shadow education minister Kevin Brennan was on the panel. When quizzed about the government's plans, Brennan, like Burnham, carefully navigated away from any pledges to reverse the structural changes that Gove is introducing.

He all but acknowledged that a Labour government would accept the mass expansion of academies and the creation of free schools as a fait accompli by the next election. (Note also that Ed Miliband accused David Cameron of importing failed free market ideas into the health service in his leader's speech. He could have made the same argument about Gove and schools - but didn't.)

By contrast I was very struck at the Liberal Democrat conference how much hostility there was to Gove's plans bubbling away under the surface. I came away with the distinct impression that many Lib Dems, including a number of MPs, are not reconciled to the free schools agenda. They feel licensed to attack the NHS reforms and wonder why they can't be just as vocal on education. (Answer: because Gove's stuff was much more clearly sign-posted in the coalition agreement.)

But one thing the Lib Dem leadership needs to remember is that free schools and academies -- even more than the NHS changes -- take money and therefore power away from local authorities. And local authorities are where most Lib Dems have conducted most of their politics in recent memory. Clegg, who came up through the European parliament, might not have noticed this stealthy assault on his party's base, but the members certainly have.

Westminster seems to have signed off on free schools and academies. I'm not sure Labour and Lib Dem grassroots got the memo.

28 comments

Benedict's picture

"I went to a awful comprehensive"

It shows.

Mrs.Josephine Hyde-Hartley's picture

The Luddite
02 October 2011 at 08:35

"Dave C. We need better teachers and be able to sack bad ones!! Dave C. If 30% leave full-time education unable to read and write and not have a basic understanding of maths, what's going wrong? It certainly wasn't because of underfunding."

Taking a more oblique angle - (or is it obtuse?) it's obvious so many school leavers have little understanding of the three r's because in reality the main gist or bulk of quality learning our kids experience happens at home anyway - in spite of all the money that gets poured into the formal schools establishment.

Kids actually learn very well at home in my experience..in ways that aren't prescribed and surely don't need to be prescribed so severely by over powered teachers, in my view. Given a chance of freedom children routinely sieze the opportunity to learn how to count and deal with real people and money when we were sent to do errands-

but where are the local shops now? And what do children learn from parents who buy everything on-line , or by wielding some bit of plastic? The simple connections between earning, buying and selling have become so ridiculously complex it doesn't seem reasonable to expect ordinary members of the public in our ordinary lives to have to thoroughly explain to our kids all of the going concerns of this economy. Who can be bothered?

Over the years I've noticed how the bits of paper and information being brought home from schools for us to sign and return, even by the youngest of kids, seems part of some completely ill-regulated requirement by which parents are effectively conned into thinking we must basically teach our own kids how to read and write at home. But we're not getting paid to do the work of teachers.. and they shouldn't take our liberty and private lives for granted.

However, I certainly don't think the answer is more meritocracy, formal schooling or prescriptive regulations. Variety is the spice of life and in my view the state should back off and let this great UK culture and economy develop itself in peace and tranquillity.

matthew fox's picture

Come on Indu Pendent, you can't tell the difference between a tax break and a subsidy.

Thatcher socio-economic experiment was a total failure, mass unemployment, the emphasis on a " Service " economy, a trebling of low income households and today's taxpayers picking up her tab.

Eddy S's picture

even though we've tried throwing as much money into education over the last 13 years we still should have done better. when it comes to maths we are way behind Singapore and many Asian countries, i read we were even behind many East European countries.

I do like the new emphasis on the English Baccalaureate, we need to drive standards higher at the same time we need to try different systems too, essentially the tories have taken one of our best ideas. if we oppose it then we are really opposing our own ideas and there is a lack of any other new ideas in this area.

Flashbuck's picture

The NS wants the state to "educate" our children = that's fascist.

Dave C's picture

Flashbuck,

There are countries where children aren't educated, but no-one much wants to live in them.

Typical definition of fascism: A system of government marked by centralisation of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.

Few would agree with your assertion that the local primary school is some hallmark of fascism.

Luddite's picture

Benedict. So why despite the billion's spend on Education, Education, Education, did Britain plummet down the international educational league table?

Dave C's picture

Luddite,

The supposed fall in the international educational league table reported by the press is largely an artefact resulting from the number of extra countries that entered the PISA scheme.

2000 (32 countries)
2006 (57 countries)
2009 (65 countries)

Flashbuck's picture

@Dave C

You can wriggle all you like but it still remains that fascism and fascists are all about Big Government. Fact!

Oh, and your hyper-reductio so-called definition more accurately denotes what Islam is all about. Nice one, sonny.

Luddite's picture

Dave C.. NO!! it isn't.. Britain ranking fell against all are leading competitors. Why was that Dave C?

Luddite's picture

Dave C.. Yesterday i sat in a beer garden and struck-up a conversion with a teacher on maternity leave. She was dreading returning to the classroom. Why should that be Dave C? I asked her a question. Did our previous Labour government dumb-down our education system, her answer was spitting out her wine "Off-course they did" Dave C.. Our schools are run for the benefit of the NUT not its pupils.

Dave C's picture

Luddite,

Please quote the PISA reports that support your viewpoint.

Luddite's picture

The UK is slipping down world education rankings in maths, reading and science, and has been overtaken by Poland and Norway, a major study of 65 countries reveals today.

Around 470,000 15-year-olds across the world sat a numeracy, literacy and science test last year, the results of which inform the latest Pisa study by the Paris-based Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

The Programme for International Student Assessment (Pisa) is highly respected across the globe, and enables politicians and policy-makers to assess how different countries' education systems compare.

It shows the UK's reputation as one of the world's best for education is at risk, and has tumbled several places since 2006.

The UK is ranked 25th for reading, 28th for maths and 16th for science. In 2006, when 57 countries were included in the study, it was placed 17th, 24th and 14th respectively. Poland has stretched ahead of the UK in maths, while Norway is now ranked higher in reading and maths.

Andreas Shleicher, head of the Pisa programme, said the picture for the UK was "stagnant at best".

"Many other countries have seen quite significant improvement," he added.

Luddite's picture

No reply!! Dave C.. now come-down from your arsehole and smell some fresh air. Dave.. If you never accept you have a problem you will never solve that problem, many on the political-left are in total denial about the magnitude of Labour's failures, Dave don't bother replying the sun's cracking the flags and i'm off down the pub.

Dave C's picture

As previously discussed, the supposed fall in the international educational league table reported by the press is largely an artefact resulting from the number of extra countries that entered the PISA scheme.

2000 (32 countries)

2006 (57 countries)

2009 (65 countries)

The number of countries and regions in the survey has roughly doubled. Only those countries with good education systems are likely to enter the scheme and consequently the 'ranking' of any individual country is likely to fall.

For example, if you were the average country in 2000, you were 16th. If you were the average country in 2009, you were 33rd. Your education system may not have declined in quality, but the headlines read "Rubovia falls 17 places in education league table".

The 'league tables' in themselves are largely meaningless. What counts is the effectiveness of an education system by the objective criteria (where there is still work to be done in the UK).

Coming back to your original point, if the investment in education hadn't happened, it's highly unlikely that the results would be better.

janee1's picture

Luddite, your last decent into abuse defeats any argument you may have had. However, quoting a single teacher on maternity leave also adds nothing to the argument.

I suspect that one reason that some countries outperform the UK may well be that those with symbolic languages (eg Japanese) are likely to outperform those with phonetic languages in Maths. Those with simple phonetic languages are likely to outperform the UK in spelling, simply because English has so many exceptions.

Getting back to school governance.... If politicians and newspapers spent as much time praising good examples in local authority schools as they do their latest vanity project, then we would really be able to improve state funded education. Whilst we continue to denigrate teachers and comprehensive schools we are missing the point and, worst still, throwing considerable amounts of money at schemes which are destined to be subsumed. For example, city technology colleges have all but disappeared but swallowed extra funding and have now become academies, again with extra funding.

It is time that Labour apologised for continuing Thatcher demonisation of teachers and teachers unions and started to support all the excellent work which is being done in conjunction with local authorities, parents and the wider community in community schools.

Fergus Pickering's picture

The comprehensive ideal! What bleeding comprehensive ideal! Crappy schools and crappy curricula. No more Latin, no more French, no more sitting on the old school bench! God give me strength.

Dave C's picture

OFQUAL has looked at this topic and quotes this study:

"It also needs to be noted that the differences between countries’ performance are not that large and are usually statistically insignificant. The ‘horse race’ approach to the rankings produced by international studies – looking to see which position England is placed in and whether or not it has moved up or down the league tables is not that meaningful partly because the absolute differences in scores between countries are not that great and partly because the constituent group of comparators changes from study to study and from year to year. Overall, and over time, England’s performance is not that worrisome."

International Comparisons in Senior Secondary Assessment:
http://www.ofqual.gov.uk/downloads/category/42-comparability?download=11...

There's an interesting take on PISA here.

Leaning tower of PISA – 7 serious skews: http://donaldclarkplanb.blogspot.com/2011/03/leaning-tower-of-pisa-7-ser...

Dave C's picture

Flashbuck,

I think you proved Mike Godwin's law.

The word fascism has a specific meaning: it's not just a term of abuse for something or someone you don't like.

If you have a dictionary in your trailer, you can find a definition there.

So let's try a few more.

Merriam-Webster: "a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition"

Dictionary.com: "a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism."

Oxford Dictionary: "an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization ... The term Fascism was first used of the totalitarian right-wing nationalist regime of Mussolini in Italy (1922–43); the regimes of the Nazis in Germany and Franco in Spain were also Fascist. Fascism tends to include a belief in the supremacy of one national or ethnic group, a contempt for democracy, an insistence on obedience to a powerful leader, and a strong demagogic approach"

tuttifrutti's picture

Well said Dave C.
I find that many who are opposed to league tables often like to quote them when it suits.

Luddite's picture

janee. So when are you going to teach our children to read and 'FUCKING' write.... Sorry just back from the pub.. A old Marxist friend said to me "Have you read this" Peter Osborne's. The economic crisis requires new thinking and Labour's leader has come up with a plan. It's certainly worth a read..

Richard Albright1's picture

Dave C When in a hole you stop digging. Luddite has proved his point.

Dave C's picture

You need well-analysed data to prove a point. Luddite hasn't offered any and neither have you.

The Luddite's picture

Dave C. We need better teachers and be able to sack bad ones!! Dave C. If 30% leave full-time education unable to read and write and not have a basic understanding of maths, what's going wrong? It certainly wasn't because of underfunding.

swatantra's picture

Andy made a mistake about the Free Schools and Academies bit, but he was dead right about the Comprehensive ideal. Comprehensives were never really given a fair chance. The were always denigrated and sidelined by succesive govts, but every school should be a local neighbourhood comprehensive.

Dave C's picture

The Luddite

Few would disagree with you, if what you say is the case.
My prescription: abolish long school holidays. We don't need children to help with the harvest any more.

Graeme's picture

And Ed was wrong to accept charity status for public schools.

Indu Pendent's picture

Ed was 100% right to accept charity status for private sector schools. It encoruages diversity in the education system.

I went to a awful comprehensive and would not force the next generation into them. Hardly any got a levels or went to uni when it was free and most kids left early to as they hated it so much. They got crap jobs and still have because they could not read or add.

I'm sick of being the guinea pig of Labour's socio economic experimentation. I am not Labours property and Labour does not own me. Its not good enough for my kids and I'm proud of that.

There needs to be a lot of choice in the system so that parent and pupil selection determines the fait of schools. That happends with private sector, bad schools dont survive and no one keeps them artificially on life support, which is one of the reasons why private do so much better than the state schools.

Blair understood it when he introduced accademies. We should have other types of school too and allow only the best to survive above people's self interests.

Latest tweets