Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Britain opposes European plans for a Robin Hood tax

Downing Street says it will defend the City from a financial transaction tax that EU leaders claim could raise billions.

Britain has vowed to fight European plans for a tax on financial transactions. At a summit in Paris on Tuesday, Nicolas Sarkozy and Angela Merkel surprised other European leaders by calling for a tax that would be applied to deals in shares, bonds, and derivatives.

Campaigners have been calling for the so-called Robin Hood tax for many months. A European Commission paper drawn up this year suggested that a tax of 0.1 per ecnt on stocks and bonds, coupled with a 0.01 per cent levy on derivatives deals, could raise between €31 billion and €50 billion each year.

The idea of a tax on financial transactions was pioneered by the American economist James Tobin but struggled to gain traction during the neoliberal dominance of the 1980s. The idea was mooted by Gordon Brown back in 2009, but he failed to gain significant support for it.

One of the main challenges of introducing a Tobin tax is reaching international agreement. Referring to this latest proposal, a Treasury spokesman said: "Any financial transaction tax would have to apply globally -- otherwise the transactions covered would simply relocate to countries not applying the tax."

Implementing the tax across Europe would go some way towards achieving this; but such a move would require the unanimous approval of all 27 of the EU's member states, and is as such unlikely.

This is a shame. The tax would reduce the excessive risk-taking that brought the world's financial system to its knees. Campaigners also estimate that a small tax could raise billions without having a negative impact on the prosperity of the sector.

Support has come from some unexpected places. In August 2009, Lord Turner, the chairman of the Financial Services Authority, suggested that a tax on financial transactions could limit the money available for bonuses and added that it would be "a nice sensible revenue source for funding global public goods".

However, the British government is clearly not interested in even exploring the option of seeking consensus on the tax. When a financial transaction tax was included in the European Commission's seven-year plan at the end of June, Downing Street instantly dismissed the proposal as "completely unrealistic". José Manuel Barroso, president of the European Commission, responded saying: "Some are saying no before they've studied the proposal which was only finalised a few hours ago ... That doesn't fit with seriousness and credibility."

Predictably, shares in backs and stockbroking firms fell with the news. Yet this is no reason for capitulation. The City has called the shots for too long, with a return to business as usual raising the spectre of another financial crash. It is a shame that Downing Street and the Treasury are so concerned with defending the status quo, rather than looking at options for substantive, long-term change.

Vote for The Staggers as your favourite blog in the Total Politics blog awards.

Tags: Tobin tax

37 comments

Harry's picture

Of course the government oppose it, they're in the pocket of the city.

Maria111's picture

At least there is a complete clarity on who are the real masters of the universe.
"The British government is clearly not interested in even exploring the option of seeking consensus on the tax [on financial transactions]." Is not this dandy!

Daniele1's picture

What happened to my comment? COME ON! do something about comments not appearing!

Chas1's picture

"The tax would reduce the excessive risk-taking that brought the world's financial system to its knees. Campaigners also estimate that a small tax could raise billions without having a negative impact on the prosperity of the sector."

Please explain exactly through what mechanism this tax would in any way reduce risk-taking? Risk taking is the method by which profit is made in the financial sector.

So, "campaigners" estimate that the tax could be raised without having a negative effect on the profitability of the sector. How did they reach this "estimate"? If I remove £1 from you in tax, that reduces your wealth by precisely £1. If I tax the financial sector by an extra £50 billion a year, that will reduce their profitability by £50 billion. Except of course they will move off-shore so they do not need to pay it. I do not need a Nobel Prize in economics to understand that these taxes are utterly destructive and stupid. The EU wants to introduce them to reduce the hegemeny over financial markets enjoyed by the UK.

Lox's picture

Geoff at 12:35, I'm not sure what vested interest the ASI might have in opposing it. It didn't work in Sweden. Why will it work in the UK?

Lox's picture

Anyway, the idea that it's a Robin Hood tax is a bit misleading. It's not taking money from the rich to give to poor people, or middle income people: it's taking money from corporations so that the state can have it. It's not the same thing.

Luddite's picture

It's ever increasing taxes, particularly corporations tax that is driving business, and jobs out of Europe and the United States.

Eddy S's picture

the tobin tax would only help this country if it was applied globally, otherwise we would lose tax revenue and our public services would suffer, less people would be employed in the UK or bank's would provide incentives for there staff to move abroad either way UK public services suffer - we would really have to hate our country to support this.

in addition bank's invest heavily in technology a transaction could be executed in hong kong at a flick of a switch - that's no kidding.

Eddy S's picture

this euro crisis is getting bad to worse and they have the cheek of asking us to pay. this really is a bad joke.

yet in this crisis sitcom, only china can sit back and enjoy double digit growth - the days of cheap debt are over as the chinese refuse our fix - i'm surprised no one is paying attention on the chinese - they have rigged the global economy.

Tom's picture

In many ways, this is no surprise. We have the EU and the Euro. Everyone says how great it will be. Meanwhile, many in the U.K. say it'll never work.

Now, how many EU members have either gone bankrupt or will soon? How angry is Merkel that Germany has to pick up the tab for all of these bailouts? Did she and Sarkozy base their "bailout committee" on the Congressional "Super Committee" in the States?

The point is no politician (and almost no economists) will publically admit that this global debt can never be repaid. This means more posturing, soundbites, summits and photo ops that mean nothing. If the EU Central Bank can't cover these bailouts, does this mean that the Fed will do it? Many European banks did get Stateside stimulus funds when they were released.

Either the funds come from somewhere. Or, everyone who should go bankrupt does.

Luddite's picture

Let's not forget, Gordon Brown enjoyed massive tax receipts from the city of London. It's just a pity gormless Gordon, didn't invest that money in manufacturing, and sustainable jobs. Ps, May-be the French and Germans are just playing 'nationalistic' politices here?

swatantra's picture

Its unbelievable that this Coalition is so out of step of with the rest of the World and Europe. The Tobin Tax is a necessary measure to keep the Bankers in line. At the moment Bankers have a license to print money and not even this Govt can stop them but an International Agreement could.

pig's picture

it was leashes like this that kept the hounds at bay, once this was dropped the results are peritinently prevalent, it is time that "leaders" become such again and stop pandering only to the inherent greed of the mercantile classes.

writeoff's picture

If you're not with Robin Hood, then you're with the Sheriff of Nottingham. But we knew that..

mcquade's picture

Downing St and the Treasury are not so much defending the status quo but their donor base whic provides 50% of funds to Tory coffers. Why put that money to some collective public good when they can have it all for themselves?

Robert Eve's picture

Two fingers to the EU over yet another tax.

purpleline's picture

If all else fails the left want to create a new Tax. Well my friends socialism has failed, the EU has failed, and the Eurozone has failed.

Mass immigration into the UK has failed and you bozo's want to keep the same old going and Tax our capitalist system to death.

Do me a favour go live in a Communist paradise and leave us alone here in the UK. A Tax on financial transactions will eventually lead to higher fees for all consumers of financial services. It will lead to lower tax take as London business is dented.

Honestisayitasitis's picture

Could the moderators please remove the advertisements which are appearing on the blog. Thank you

http://twitter.com/#!/Rakehell_Obi's picture

From NuLAb to the ConDems, Britain keeps striving towards an American Corporatist state.

Can't this site use a commenting application like Livefyre or DISQUS?

Johnnydub's picture

My God.. Jesus what a bunch a knee jerk know nothings...

The Tobin tax would be a disaster.. it makes market volatility worse, and the costs would fall on us the people not the banks themselves..

Lastly across Europe we would pay 80% of the total tax base and it would go straight into the southern Euro debt hole.

Do you really hate your own country and fellow citizens so much?

Robert Taggart's picture

Can Blighty not simply veto this ?
Three cheers to the Sheriff of Tatton !

mike cobley's picture

"Do you really hate your own country and fellow citizens so much?"

Actually, I really hate banker, financiers and bond traders - who are citizens of Global Finance, and who display not a shred of loyalty towards this nation's civil society. So, in essence, screw em. Bring on the tax.

Mark's picture

Why make London pay for the failures of the Eurozone?

This is absurd.

Let europe fund their own bailout system on things they produce...

An Old Boy's picture

Of course the French and Germans are in favour of this tax - it would fall largely on this country.

The idea that introducing it across the EU would go anywhere meeting the need for international agreement in order to avoid transactions being switched to countries which do not have a Tobin tax is simply daft. The transactions currently undertaken in London would be moved to Switzerland and New York.

In short, this is a very, very silly idea.

Pogo's picture

When a Tobin tax was tried in Sweden it only raised about 3% of the amount expected and simultaneously drove much of the financial industry away.

Anyway, any tax supported by the idiots Brown and Turner simply has to be a bad idea.

S Moore's picture

Of course the Torys don't want this tax , their funded by the bloody bankers/financial sector who created this mess.

Bring it on and up it to 5%

Mark's picture

For all you frothing lefties so convinced that bashing financial services is the route to equality, you might like to consider that actually, it will only make spending on your bretheren reduce.

Way to go!

http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/tax-and-economy/executive-summary:-the-tob...

Marcus's picture

“could raise between €31 billion and €50 billion each year”
From where? The magic money tree?

Anon's picture

purpleline - so tired of the same old same old argument in your 2nd last line. Why are we always told by people like you that higher minimum wages, higher social safeguards, bank bailouts, better work standards, higher pensions, higher tax etc. will all lead to higher costs for end-users. Never lower profits, lower pay at the top or lower returns for shareholders? Are these amounts fixed in stone or somehow untouchable, or does it simply not occur because you are so willing to let the wealthy rule you as they wish? Balls in a vice, Tory-worshipper.

geoff's picture

@Marcus

No from taxing some rich people, i beleive this is mentioned in the article...

@Mark

Dont you think the Adam Smith Institute may have some vested interest in slamming this tax?

David Meer's picture

If Socialism has failed, why has China become the most powerful economy in the world?

Orthodoxcaveman's picture

Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Finland, and Norway are routinely held up as successful states in global polls, and they're all high tax economies with some of the strongest unions you'll find anywhere.
Global capitalism is in crisis, what's new?

phd's picture

You do not want to tax transactions, you let people make money and tax their income! If you kill some activity you will get neither income taxes nor FTT nor jobs! And the FTT will be paid by you actually not by the banks. So you better tax incomes not the incentives/activities!

FatMan's picture

"If all else fails the left want to create a new Tax. Well my friends socialism has failed, the EU has failed, and the Eurozone has failed."

Yeah, Capitalism is working out great!

purpleline's picture

David Meer 12:43 Quite simple China is actually a two system country, which will lead to civil war eventually as the poor rise up and get slaughtered.

The elites in China are rabid capitalists with an added dangerous element of being aggressive gamblers

C. Raja's picture

A financial transaction tax, applied to all exchanges globally will effectively end speculation, large bonuses to a few people in finance, rich becoming richer & hollowing of nations and economies. Here is how. Say, depositors put 100 million pounds in a bank. The bank can loan out 100 million pounds, to a firm, say engaged in manufacturing. It will make a debt instrument, say a bond for this. That bond can be sold again for 100 million pounds or more, if the interest payable by the manufacturer is higher than interbank rate. Such bonds from different banks can be mixed creating more instruments of higher denominations. Some of those in the mix will be loans / mortgages made out to the homeless, - which will never be paid. All the while, the financial paper floating around will be way more than the initial 100 million pounds- 10X, 100X , 1000X or more of 'paper money'. Moment a default occurs, viz. like the US homeloans in 2008 onwards, the ponzi-like pyramid will collapse. Then debts, bailouts etc will be required, along with austerity involving closures and job cuts. Now, moment a transaction tax is put, there is a brake to the amount of financial paper that can get produced. Roughly, a 0.01% tax will restrict the multiplication of financial paper to 100X or less, assuming other prudent oversight measures are present. In such a case there is a cap to unimaginable profits from speculation, to bonuses of people in high finance, and to hollowing out of nations. The tobin tax, therefore, should bother only 'City' and Wall-street types. Tell you what the 30 or 50 billion that Eurozone expects to make by levying the tax, is nothing- the 'city' and 'wall street' hordes will pay twice or thrice that amount in bribes just to have the licence to create paper money without any underlying economic activity continued, by means of unfettered financial transactions!

Stuart Eels's picture

purpline - it's already happening according to today's Indy.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets