Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read pieces from this morning's papers.

1. Blaming a moral decline for the riots makes good headlines but bad policy (Observer)

The country's problems stem from too many dysfunctional households, argues Tony Blair.

2. Now it's payback for the love we looted (Sunday Times) (£)

Prince Charles should be applauded for identifying the underlying problems that led to young people rioting across the country, writes Jenni Russell.

3. Why are the failings of capitalism only being exposed by the right? (Observer)

It used to be Labour that fought against the moral inadequacies of the free market. It must rediscover its voice, says Julian Coman.

4. You say you'll flee higher taxes, Mr Filthy? We call your bluff (Sunday Times) (£)

The mega-rich may have everyone else over a barrel for now, but perhaps it's not long before they belong to the controllable classes, argues Minette Marrin.

5. A bewildering tale of everyday English justice (Observer)

For the father of one young man arrested during the riots, a day in court has done nothing to cement his faith in our legal system, writes Nick Cohen.

6. UK riots: The end of the liberals' great moral delusion (Telegraph)

The Left has gone into overdrive in its attempts to rewrite the history of the riots, but the public knows the truth, argues Janet Daley.

7. A class imprisoned by tribalism, lack of work and filthy food (Independent on Sunday)

We don't need to lock up deprived kids, writes Janet Street-Porter, we need to help them.

8. Ken's Adolf jibe was a joke - remember those? (Sunday Times) (£)

Finally, at least we can have a laugh at something after a summer which has, quite frankly, been non too impressive, writes Rod Liddle.

9. What should the Tories do about the euro crisis? (Telegraph)

The Eurosceptic Right want to exploit the crisis - but George Osborne's options are limited, says Tim Montgomerie.

10. Clever talk costs livelihoods (Independent on Sunday)

Riots in Britain, earthquakes in Japan, panic in the eurozone... and capitalism is a survivor every time, writes John Rentoul.

Getty
Show Hide image

Ukrainians now have more freedom of travel - but less freedom of thought

Ukraine's government is rightly concerned about Russian cyber aggression. But does that merit online censorship?

Ukrainians have sacrificed so much in their bid to be recognised as fellow Europeans. Their struggle to extricate themselves from Russian domination is written in the blood of the Euromaidan protestors and the toll of its military dead.

The slow progress of Ukraine’s emergence, into something resembling normality, passed another milestone on 17 May, when President Petro Poroshenko signed an agreement with the EU allowing for visa-free travel in 34 European countries. 

From Sunday 11 June Ukrainians with biometric passports will be able to travel in Europe and stay for 90 days within a 180 period. There are obvious economic benefits to the new agreement. Ukrainians will be free to travel and conduct business with much more efficacy. The new agreement will also reduce the insularity of Ukrainians, many of whom yearn for the cosmopolitanism they see in Western Europe. President Poroshenko was mindful of the symbolism of the agreement. He declared: "Ukraine is returning to the European family. Ukraine says a final farewell to the Soviet and Russian empire."

Perched on the periphery, Ukraine is now set to become more woven into the European mainstream. Ukrainians sense that the western door is slowly but inexorably opening, and that both recognition, and validation beckons. In this respect, it seems that there is much to celebrate.

However, as ever, Ukraine hangs uneasily in the balance between the old ways and the new. On 16 May, Poroshenko signed a decree blocking access to Russian social media websites Yandex, VKontakte and Odnoklassniki. Millions of Ukrainians sign in to these websites every day. Even Poroshenko himself uses them. Five Russian TV stations are already banned in Ukraine. Poroshenko says that "Ukrainians can live without Russian networks". And it is certainly a fact that Ukrainians have responded to the decree by turning away from the Russian platforms in great numbers. Ukrainian Facebook is growing by some 35 percent a day.

In the context of Ukraine’s continuing conflict with Russia, it is perhaps understandable that the government in Kiev wishes to limit Russian trolls, together with Russian state influence and misinformation. This is certainly also the case across the whole western world, which is keenly aware of Russian cyber aggression. Nevertheless, one must ask why countries such as Britain, France and Germany continue to allow their citizens to access Russian media platforms, when Ukraine does not. 

While the new travel freedoms for Ukrainians has unleashed optimism, the latest decree has indicated something a little darker about the future. President Poroshenko would do well to consider the actions of other European governments that he so ardently wishes to emulate. Closing down social networks is usually done by authoritarian regimes like North Korea, China and Saudi Arabia. But Poroshenko advocates democracy, and in democracy there is no place for such acts. It is surely a mark of a nation’s maturity to encourage freedom of thought, as well travel.

Mohammad Zahoor is the publisher of Ukrainian newspaper The Kyiv Post.

 

0800 7318496