Feeling the heat (or not)
A fifth of UK households suffer fuel poverty while energy giants cash in.
By Tess Riley Published 05 August 2011 19:46
Last month, secretary of state for energy and climate change Chris Huhne issued the government's latest energy report. The Electricity Market Reform (EMR) white paper makes clear how keen the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) is to promote investment in gas, despite the fact that the fossil fuel's prices are currently sky-rocketing.
In the same week, DECC published its annual fuel poverty report. This highlights the significant rise in fuel poverty between 2008 and 2009 (most recent figures), with DECC predicting that figures for 2010 and 2011 will have increased further due to ongoing rises in energy costs.
The schism between the two government reports is striking and signals a worrying trend in the British energy market that sees energy corporations taking advantage of the rise in wholesale gas prices to exploit the British consumer to an unprecedented degree.
A household is defined as fuel poor if it spends more than ten per cent of its income on fuel to maintain adequate levels of warmth. Since 2003, soaring gas and electricity prices have been too great to be offset by rising incomes or energy efficiency measures, leading to year-on-year growth in fuel poverty (Fig. 1). In 2009, the number of fuel poor households in the UK was approximately 5.5 million, a rise of around one million from the previous year. In other words, more than a fifth of all UK households are now living in fuel poverty.
Figure 1 - Fuel poverty in the UK, all households and vulnerable, 1996 to 2009

Source: DECC Fuel Poverty Statistics 2011
Where gas is concerned, energy firms have blamed enormous price increases on the 30 per cent rise in wholesale cost. However, consumer price rises go far beyond this. Wholesale costs are nowhere near their 2008 peak yet consumer prices are at an all-time high. Energy consumers are therefore being exploited by energy firms at a time when they most crucially require support.
Today, E.ON became the fourth of the six major energy firms to announce increases in its gas and electricity prices, the second rise this year for the company. Scottish & Southern, British Gas and Scottish Power have already announced further price rises.
One of the most worrying outcomes is the impact that this is having on the elderly. Almost 50 per cent of those living in fuel poverty are over 60. Last December, George Monbiot underlined the severity of the UK's failure to address this disgraceful problem:
Although we usually have one of the smallest differences between winter and summer temperatures at these latitudes, we also have one of the highest levels of excess winter deaths. Roughly twice as many people, per capita, die here than in Scandanavia and other parts of northern Europe, though our winters are typically milder. Even Siberia has lower levels of excess winter deaths than we do. Between 25,000 and 30,000 people a year are hastened to the grave by the cold here - this winter it could be much worse.
More widely, the majority of households experiencing fuel poverty are statistically "vulnerable", in other words they contain the elderly, children or someone who is disabled or has a long term illness. In England, over 70 per cent of households are classified as such.
There are several steps that must be taken to address the escalating problem of fuel poverty. For a start, it is fundamental that energy regulator Ofgem starts to assert itself in the face of criminal price hikes. With one of the least regulated energy markets in the developed world, very little will change until the big six are brought under much tighter control.
Investment in energy efficiency measures and implementation of green energy programmes are likewise going to be fundamental to addressing the longer-term energy crisis, particularly in a world needing to get to grips rapidly with climate change and diminishing natural resources.
The energy giants currently have what seems like free reign to do as they please. It's time to tell E.ON and co. to F.OFF.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















7 comments
paulm: Not even close, if it was it would explain also the gas price hikes would it not.... Poor build quality is to blame for high energy use in many situations. If our government had invested the same sums of money into major green energy programmes it had used to bail out the banking sector, and kept it in public ownership things would be different, Green Energy Programmes are not the problem , vested interests and public apathy or confusion are. The simple addition of a solar hot water system means my average gas bill for 8 months a year are £4 for a 3 bed three adult household. Up front costs £2,400. no grants or cost to the public.
@ victor f
£1.50 for 10kWh really isn't that much. The standard tariff for the traditional electricity supplier in London (EDF) works out at £1.28 for 10kWh and that's before standing charge. Remember that Swedish incomes are also higher so the proportion of income there will be lower.
It's also well-known that Swedish homes need to use less energy.
Here in Sweden almost all families pay more then 10 percent of the income after tax for the energy. And we also have to pay a special tax extra to pay for investments in wind power. The tax added to the electricity price is almost three times the electricity cost. So you have actually a very good situation in UK. So the big problem here is the extremely high taxation. Winter time we pay around £1.50 for 10 kWh.
When will you people realise that one of the main reasons for rocketing prices is the escalating Renewables Obligation system that forces suppliers to get more and more of their electricity from 'green' sources, regardless of cost? This cost is passed directly on to the customer.
"green energy programmes" are the problem, not the solution.
Can anyone tell us whether or not the old state monopolies charged more for the energy they provided to the British public than these new competitive private corporations do in the current circumstances.
Some of us have done the math! Others of us have checked the calculations.
We ask the questions. We know the answers! Is it a nice little earner? Or is it a nice BIG earner? These energy providers seem quite happy to apply the 'eskimo' solution used almost two centuries ago to deal with unforgiving nature's attitude to the old folk.
More importantly, how will this affect George Osborne's inheritance tax policy? Highly unethically, at least.
Gerontocrats
How can Shylock (aka Osborne) dare say 'we're all in this together'...Energy companies are making scandalous profits on the back of consumers, bankers are back to awarding themselves massives bonuses, it's only about a year since the MP's expense's scandal was uncovered, we now hear high ranking police officers have been arrested for corruption & abuse of power...no, enough is enough
@victor f
That price is just about the same as I pay. And as I unedrstand it, Sweden has much better housing standards which means that you need less fuel to keep warm. Many of the houses I have lived in - especially rented ones - won't even get warm because the heat leaks out of them faster than the heating can put it out.
Post new comment