The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Miliband's new energy policy could be a vote winner

A greener and cheaper approach would have significant appeal.

A Hackgate-galvanised Ed Miliband has picked a new Goliath to aim his slingshot at. In a little-noticed newspaper interview, the Labour leader pledged to demolish the Big Six energy suppliers' control of the domestic electricity and gas market: "Six energy companies control 99.9 per cent of the consumer market. This cannot be right and we must take action to open up the market over the coming months," he said. Household bills will fall as result, he claimed.

The phone-hacking scandal has provided Team Miliband with some traction. His story of the powerful-versus-the-powerless is gaining momentum. Attacking what he sees as the unfettered interests of the over-powerful started with banks, and flourished with newspaper proprietors. The energy companies are now firmly in his sights.

It was a carefully-chosen political target. A recent poll by Populus found that 63 per cent of 2,000 respondents were "very concerned" about rising gas and electricity prices. The issue is nearly twice as important to the British public as the state of the NHS, unemployment rates and public sector cuts, which have all received far greater media attention. Miliband, reacting quickly to recent energy price rises, has grabbed a topic that wouldn't normally attract attention until the autumn, when the weather turns colder.

In his zeal to keep bills down, Labour's leader must not ignore the cost of green policies in higher energy prices. Currently climate policies add around 14 per cent on to household electricity prices (and 4 per cent on gas prices), according to government figures. By 2020, policies will increase electricity prices by more than 30 per cent. For businesses, the percentage rise is around 40 per cent.

This is tricky political territory for Miliband, who ran the Department for Energy and Climate Change before last year's election. However, his new focus on protecting people's pockets should lead to a fresh look at wasteful policies.

Top of the list should be the EU's 2020 Renewable Energy Directive, which needlessly commits the UK to meeting 15 per cent of its total energy needs from renewable sources by 2020. This move was driven by a desire for a catchy European green slogan rather than hard-headed economics. By forcing the UK to decarbonise by installing expensive offshore wind rather than cheaper alternatives like improving energy efficiency and more nuclear power, this sloganeering will cost UK bill-payers at least £12.5 billion. In addition, the Coalition's proposed overhaul of the electricity market will unpick a major public policy success of the last 30 years, and risks further unnecessary price rises. The confusing jumble of carbon prices that the current policy mish-mash has created should also be overhauled (Policy Exchange has called for the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme to be scrapped as part of a much-needed tidy up and replaced with mandatory carbon reporting).

A clearer carbon price, backed by contracts, will ensure the cheapest possible emissions cuts are made first. At the same time, finding long-term, low carbon technologies that are cheaper than coal and gas requires a smarter focus on research and development.

Reaching carbon targets will increase household and business energy prices. Politicians must be up front about that. However, the government -- and Miliband -- should maintain an unrelenting focus on ensuring that any move to becoming greener is as done as cheaply as possible.

Guy Newey is a senior research fellow for environment and energy at Policy Exchange.

5 comments

Mark's picture

"By forcing the UK to decarbonise by installing expensive offshore wind rather than cheaper alternatives like improving energy efficiency and more nuclear power, this sloganeering will cost UK bill-payers at least £12.5 billion."

Clearly, you've not the slightest idea of what nuclear power actually costs, and have fallen prey to the casual propaganda.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2011/aug/01/hinkley-c-reactor...

The nearest comparisons to UK nuclear power, the private initiatives in France, are breathtakingly over budget. They are hugely expensive, and in real terms will produce power that is on par if not more expensive than offshore wind. Of course that's before the taxpayer foots the bill for the insurance costs - no private firms will touch insuring nuclear power stations, which means the government take the bill. Come to think of it, no nuclear power station in the world operations without huge subsidies.

Luddite's picture

Nuclear power is not the answer, green politics neither. Coal is the only real alternative. Ed: should say Labour will restart the coal industry and nationalise all power production.

C Baker's picture

Ed should know a bit about how this all works, having been energy minister at one point, or something similar. Gas and electricity prices are going up and up. Everytime a bill arrives, there is news of an increase it seems. The breakdown of my bill from British Gas, shows quite a percentage going on vat and carbon targets, or green investment- something of that ilk. I have looked to change, but the prices all end up the same in the end, when considered yearly. We all know they fix prices between themselves. Then there is the finite nature of these resources and their supply, which we should worry about. But it seems that, like supermarkets with food, they use this as an excuse to hike prices. None of the profit goes to workers wages, just the fat cats with bonuses.

I'm all for protecting the environment. I don't wish to live in a poluted town etc. However, energy prices are becoming a bigger chunk out of household income and the price increases never stop. I can't think of a comparable commodity, that keeps going up and never goes down ever. Even gold fluctuates.

I'm also intrigued by the people with solar panels and various contraptions, you see on tv, in local communities, that are selling their energy back. This takes investment, but if it really works- i'm quite intrigued. Imagine powering your house by sun, compost and wind alone! and saying goodbye to the large bills. Also, do we really have any control of foreign supplies/companies that supply us? I hope so, but i fear we do not.

swatantra's picture

Is Ed actually advocating even more prvatisation and 'competition'. Even more cold calling by Energy Companies on your doorstep, offering a beter deal, which isn't worth the paper its written on. If so then I'm not buying it.
I think we've had about enough of our Utilities being split up. Lets go back to one nationalised company which can be held accountable to the people, instead of the plethora of energy suppliers who waste more on advertising in trying to win business when that money could be better used in cutting costs to the customer by a Nationalised Co.
The business world will have to accept that competition is not the answer to everything.

Mr Danger's picture

I can see how it could be a vote winner - when global energy prices go up, the public tends to blame their local provider. So making energy companies take the blame is good politics even if it is economically illiterate.

The reality is that Thatcher liberalised energy markets a long time ago, and the UK has enjoyed good pricing as a result. The main problem is that people simply do not switch provider. They moan and complain, they shake their fist at the evil energy companies, but they don't compare prices and get themselves the best deal on the market.

Government has done what it can to make better prices available, but if the consumer won't take them then, too bad.

Latest tweets