Tony Blair: there's no moral decline in this country
Former PM challenges left and right to think again about the riots.
By Jonathan Derbyshire Published 21 August 2011 10:55
Tony Blair makes a rather thoughtful contribution in today's Observer to the debate about the riots that began two weekends ago in Tottenham in north London. Those who suspected his populist instincts would lead him to endorse the response of the law-and-order right to the disorder (that it was a matter of "sheer criminality") will, I suspect, be surprised. "We are in danger," he writes, "of the wrong analysis leading to the wrong diagnosis, leading to the wrong prescription."
Tougher, punitive prison sentences of the kind currently being handed down by magistrates across the country aren't the answer, Blair argues. But nor are "conventional social programmes" of the kind that the left routinely supports. I think he means by that attempts to mitigate the effects of "social deprivation" that are held to be the root cause of the violence. And as for the question of causation, Blair is briskly dismissive of the idea that Britain is in the grip of some far-reaching "moral decline". Thinking that it is just leads to "muddle-headed analysis".
So if it isn't moral decline that's fanning urban discontent, what is it? The man who once told Jeremy Paxman that "It's not a burning ambition for me to make sure that David Beckham earns less money" acknowledges that entrenched and deepening inequality has something to do with it:
I do think there are major issues underlying the anxieties reflected in disturbances and protests in many nations. One is the growing disparity of incomes not only between poor and rich but between those at the top and the aspiring middle class.
That last reference to the gap between "those at the top and the aspiring middle class" suggests Blair has been listening to what Ed Miliband has been saying about the "squeezed middle". But he says we should be wary of drawing together, as Miliband has done to considerable effect in recent days, "the MPs' expenses row, bankers and phone-hackers in all this" (though he says he agrees with the Labour leader on "the theme of responsibility"). And his Panglossian remarks on "corporate social resonsibility" suggest he still hasn't grasped the scale of the calamity that befell the global financial system in the autumn of 2008 nor the extent to which the City of London remains a source of untamed, unaccountable power:
I agree totally with the criticisms of excess in pay and bonuses. But is this really the first time we have had people engaged in dubious financial practices or embracing greed, not good conduct? If anything, today's corporations are far more attuned to corporate social responsibility, far better in areas like the environment, far more aware of the need to be gender- and race-balanced in recruiting.
But at least Blair thinks, as Iain Duncan Smith said last week (directly contradicting David Cameron), that you can't arrest your way of deep-seated social problems:
[T]hese individuals [involved in the rioting] did not simply have an individual problem. They had a family problem. This is a hard thing to say and I am of course aware that this, too, is a generalisation. But many of these people are from families that are profoundly dysfunctional, operating on completely different terms from the rest of society, middle class or poor. ... This is a phenomenon of the late 20th century. You find it in virtually every developed nation. Breaking it down isn't about general policy or traditional programmes of investment or treatment.
We should be grateful, I suppose, that Blair doesn't think, as the current Prime Minister seems to, that jerking the knee suffices at moments like this.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















73 comments
@ Awake,
My argument is not bollox you just haven't engaged with it. It is a simple modus tollens, or 'monkey's uncle' argument which in my mind runs thus:
Premise a, when people are pushed by extreme events they riot.
Premise b, multiculturism is not an extreme event.
Conclusion: multiculturism does not cause riots.
Maybe you saw other other people's comments and followed their lead, but I maintain my position on this.
Wow! All the kings of comedy (Flashbuck & B.Small), with all their 'brilliant' cherry-picked history lessons and twisted assemblage of facts, trashed everything with their ignorant hatred, and then left without a peep of a solution - just like the lunatics bashing up the streets!
Someone should send him to the Hague and London Riots are an aftermath of New Labour!!!
Fair enough.
'If E then R' looks wrong, but if you make M=E to explain R then you have to accept it.
As pointed out of Japan (recent events) prove not all Es result in Rs, so even if M does = E it does not mean there will be an R. I would say M is less an E than wars, famines, natural disasters, which is why the following annoyed me:
"But of course that's total rubbish. Japan has no such problems, neither do Singapore or South Korea, etc., etc.
And guess what? Such developed nations are largely monocultural and racially homogeneous with robust justice systems."
Or absence of M = absence of R, but my link showed absence of M did not = absence of R (assuming that Japan has not grown less culturally diverse in the last 100 years).
That's it though, I'm spent.
tony blair lives on another planet.
Why is it that blacks must never be criticised? Why can thy do no wrong?
most of the uks problems could be solved by simply invading Iran, this is a cast iron fact. I sincerely believe this to be true.
Flashbuck,
Have a look at this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice_Riots_of_1918
And look at the cause!
@ (apparently) Awake
'@ RM- the 1918 japanese earthquake was a poor example...'
It would have been, if it was an earthquake.
You obviously didn't think about it but thought you would tell me about your mother-in-law instead.
Thanks,
I love the smell of white supremacism in the morning - it smells like Enoch Powell's socks.
So basically after another long winded superfluous rant ...
B.Small's solution is:
to build a CONCENTRATION CAMP!
EEEEHHHHEEEEMMM ... Ring any bells!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I wonder how much Blair was paid to say - well really nothing. Young people never involved in riots or from dysfunctional families joined in the action - why?
Blair and Mandelson with their millions hardly help set an example of moderation.
The 'honesty' prevalent in Japanese society is a one-way street. Under the benevolent eye of the Yakuza the have-nots in Japanese society make darn sure they provide, or make reparations for the 'haves' in the upper reaches of that multi-layered class of people.
No vandals or overtly anti-social elements in the lower
levels of this controlled society dare step out of line. Remember what happened to those boy rapists in 'The Godfather'?
Absolute obedience to the authorities is demanded and any failure to do so brings strict enforcement by the official, organized syndicate known as the Yakuza .
Now look, not too closely, at the Japanese Nuclear Industry. Absolute subservience by the masses. The economy is stultified and so is the society.
A Western audience may be motivated to riot if they were obliged to watch a constant stream of Japanese movies such as 'The Circle', 'The Suicide Club' and Godzilla.
We think there are 'kitchen-sink' dramas in there somewhere but they've never made it to Hollywood.
1941
Flashbuck,
But you said Japan has no such problems because they are 'largely monocultural and racially homogeneous...' And I was pointing out that they have had riots and they had nothing to do with race.
But as you say, if that's the best I can do...
I'm afraid Tony seems to have completely lost the plot.
Of course there is a moral decline; of course its to do with greed and not the collective concsciousness and goodwill of the people towards humankind.
However, this decline is not just restricted to Britain but across all of Europe and America.
Its the inability of the West to see and understand the aspirations of the developing world and to keep the resources for themselves and not to share and even be willing to take less and give out more out of the goodness of their heart.
In the end the battle will be about water and food not oil and if the West doesn't make sacrifices then the developing peoples will have to take the little that there is in order to survive.
@Linda Goodman -
Well said Linda. We should get the Gingers too - Hucknell, Wade and their kind need rounding up.
And while we're at it, what about the Capricorns?
Thanks anyway, Tony. Visited Fallujah recently?
Awake!'s 'scientific logic' does little to explain why cities like the highly multi-cultural New York and Toronto, are not rife with an onslaught of 'extreme events'... which by-and-by disproves any connections between multiculturalism and extreme events. Not even London is rife with 'extreme events', nor could any city truly be, no matter how homogenous it is. Race therefore, has little to do with it. Yes, it may be a factor, but it is not the cause, and by the examples I have provided there is no way you can scientifically prove your point.
if you still care to argue - first - why don't you calculate the number of minutes London has been reported to have been in the state of an 'extreme event' and compare it to the number of minutes it was not. Which
number is greater?
London, as it stands is multicultural, and we do not hear any 'extreme events' persisting, do we? No.
B.SMAL: Stop it!! the political-left doesn't care much for honesty...
Flashbuck,
You quoted back at me that 'events were unparalleled in modern history' but when it suits your particular brand of oratory the events become 'ancient history'.
You do not even begin to consider that something other than an absence of multiculturism could cause people not to loot - perhaps fear of radioactive poisoning from the nuclear disaster focused their minds, or perhaps it is national character and a feeling of 'all being in it together'. But I don't think it is for the reason you give.
Save your insults too, I'm not interested.
@RM,give it up, Flashbuck has you good and proper. Your example was somewhat silly.
But how could there be «moral decline» in the UK ? Anthony Charles Lynton Blair et cohortes set a standard for moral decline from which no mere rioters could aspire to decline further....
Henri
tony is really the master and commander at this sort of stuff, he always strikes the right notes and balance, even though i may disagree with his conclusions.
Flashbuck - read carefully you muppet - he said 'virtually', not absolutely every nation; and stop calling it a racial issue - its about futility of capitalism.
Oh B.Small!...stop it, stop it...the laughing is just killing me....
So, returning from Planet Enoch for a moment...why is it that gangs of looting knuckleheads makes Britain broken, while coke-addled bankers and traders steering the nation to the brink of ruin is not?
@ MIke - because it does not fit into B.Small's insular, racist view of the world.
B.Small - So you think white christians have become a 'supreme race' by doing nothing but spreading peace love and harmony? You think Empire is synonymous with good will? You think greedy capitalists were benevolent in their actions to imperial subjects spread all throughout the world? You think all of this is only happening to English Christians because your culture both supreme and innocent?
Your argument is full of fascist paradoxes.
I have a PhD in political thought.
Your views are aligned with the same ideologies that led to the rise of nazi germany.
Flashbuck ... so you are a nationalist supporting monoracialism and monoculturalism for england - one big white happy family all wearing the same clothes. That idea was dead a long time ago - move on.
Which version do you want?
From the Right: civilization's in decline, the young have no respect, there are too many who are paid for doing nothing and far too many of these have skins darker than my own, whilst their parents are just as dysfunctional and need to get a grip.Besides, civilization is a frail plant and, if it's not watered by streams of tradition, it wilts, dies and chaos comes again. Moreover, it's about time we ditched the language of entitlement and started taking responsibility for our own actions.
All very true!
And from the Left: our young people have been robbed of hope by a dysfunctional economy, built on greed and irresponsibility. The most vulnerable of our young come from ethnic minorities which have faced generations of racism, exclusion and police harrassment. Our education system has also failed them and there's no-one they can look up to as role models....certainly not our venal political class, media or corporate power brokers, who are all busy creaming off whilst the ship heads for the rocks. We need to start rebuilding our sense of communal responsibility and to reign in our materialism or we'll be finished as a society.
Also, all very true.
And then there's the fact, noted by a few foreigners with an awareness of UK history, that rioting and mayhem are as British as Roast Beef and Yorkshire Pudding.
It's what we do every 20 years or so. And then we go back to quietly loathing and distrusting each other, whilst feeling smug about rioting foreigners.
Also all very true!
B.SMALL writrs, 'A racist I AM NOT, A CULTURIST, I MOST CERTAINLY AM, AND WITH VERY GOOD HISTORICAL REASON'S'
I imagine that among the reasons (no apostrophe Mr Hi-IQ) you call yourself a CULTURIST are the Nuremburg Trials. Victors' justice perhaps, but a good victory all the same.
The war criminal giving us advice, that's a first...
It makes no difference where I am from, not you could tell by initials; but that is probably a condition of your psychosis.
I am amazed that you can continue to see nothing but negativity in anything but in your own nation/race.
You are not even citing the fundamental contributions that the Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Arabs made to European civilisation. Furthermore, the anglo-saxons were a germanic tribe. Doofus.
There are nations aligned with social democracy - the nordic model (Denmark, Iceland, Norway, Sweden and Finland) - that are prosperous, multi-cultural, have low unemployment, are egalitarian, stable, secular, and have a high GDP. What about those facts?
@ RM-
been a while since i manipulated logical operators:
so far:
E= extreme evnt
R= riot
M=multiculturalism (I had to introduce this 3rd variable to ease the intutiveness), and M=-E, problem is i'm stuck with:
If E then R, M(or-E), therefore..
Rape happens every day, everywhere, and is a horrible committed by people of various races. Stop making generalisations. Stop changing the subject.
You simply must have the last word and must be absolutely right and do so by cherry picking random criticisms of other races, beliefs, creeds, cultures, and nationalities – so have at it.
And by the way, if you are so anti-social, and hate everything, and everyone, then go live out in the woods like the barbarian you truly are.
"If anything, today's corporations are far more attuned to corporate social responsibility, far better in areas like the environment, far more aware of the need to be gender- and race-balanced in recruiting."
Is that a choice made out of the goodness of their hearts?
B.SMALL.. Take no notice the left have lost.. and they know it, but they will still try to drag us all into the abyss.
i think ure saying this (assume M=-E):
if E then R
-E
therefore:
if -E then -R
which is invalid.
by the way, although obviously the validity of your argument(which I can't establish, if u could help that'd be fine)won't be affected, i disagree with your premise B, that multiculturalism is not an extreme event.
Christ you guys still not calmed down yet ! You never did tell me the square root of 289 by the way did you?
It is amazing to see so many right-wing nut jobs roosting on a left-wing newspaper's comment log. If you are so anti-left, and hate other cultures, races and nations then why don't you all go hang out at the sun.co.uk where you belong? You can have your little weird sect of non-sense preaching and reassure yourselves of your contribution to the world there, You can caress each other and reassure yourselves of egotistic supremacy outside the view of sane and rational thinkers.
@bsmall
u realy don't live in the real world. comparing a country where throwing people in jail is a business with somewhere with at least a few human rights is a joke.
i dont condone hooliganism but come and live in the real world. did u happen to spend anytime in the bronx or downtown LA???
idiot
I just love the way these right wing crackpots think the country has been run by the Left and the Guardian for the last 30 years ! I think it`s all the fault of that awful woman who was in charge in the 1980s ; name escapes me for the moment ; ah yes ... Polly Toynbee, that`s it !
RM1
Please do not get into a debate with people who base their world views on Xenophobis, facism and racism. Just like Limburgh, Glen Beck, Conservatives and Republican.
Speak to those on this site that understands facts, reasons and logic, and disregard the fascist.
I believe in freedom of speech with respomsibility but I hope the Newstateman is keeping a profile of some of these nutters on this site. We all know what happen in Norway.
@B.SMALL and @Flashbuck - very interesting history lessons from you. Let's throw everything out of the window and just say you're right, for argument's sake. What would be your solution to the problems experienced by this great yet morally bankrupt country? How would Britannia rule the waves again?
Guys, are you serious? B.Small, grow some balls and learn to not caps rage.
Flashbuck, don't repetitively attack RM1 after he has dropped his piece of evidence. There is no point arguing with an obvious xenophobe.
RM1 and Lady J - thanks for being semi sane.
Anyway, back to the Telegraph, I have been sufficiently put off the New Statesmen as a hive of Candy-Asses.
RM- forgive me, in the split second that my mind recognised catastrophe (rice riot) i wrote a word that is representative of a catastrophe (earthquake). It is possible that the recent earthquake affected this thought process.
My point, however, still stands, and therefore your argument is still bollox, namely that in Asia the depravity we witnessed here recently is unheard of.
if it helps I have lived in HK and Japan also, so i speak from direct experience.
The west has an amazing welfare system, no doubt, and has achieved great innovations etc blah blah blah... It's undoing will be it's ego, the very same ego that led it to such greatness. Peskey pesky paradoxes...
Communist Russia beat Nazi Germany. The Allies started the 2nd front at D-Day to support Russian advances and to prevent Stalin reaching the Atlantic Coast.
The USA had been saved from Capitalist Economic Collapse by Roosevelt's Social Democratic "New DeaL". Britain adopted a collectivist approach to society to bring the population together in a sufficiently efficient manner to hold out long enough for Roosevelt to bring the States in (luckily for us the Japanese gave him his chance)
Human beings do best in Collectivist minded Co-operative Societies. Always have done always will. Christians do not see skin colour. They pay their taxes and give whatever is left to poor people - read the new Testament America!
Post new comment