More unsolicited advice for Ed Miliband
The Labour leader's style is under scrutiny.
By Jonathan Derbyshire Published 12 June 2011 12:49
And so it goes on - the proffering of unsolicited advice to Ed Miliband. The papers are full of it this morning, as well more of the kind of outlandish speculation about high-level discontent in Labour at Miliband's leadership I discussed yesterday.
The Sunday Times splashes with "Labour big beasts maul Ed Miliband" (£). Apparently, according to Isabel Oakeshott and Marie Woolf, "senior party figures say they were wrong to elect him and give him a year to prove himself". Who are those "senior figures"? One of them is David Blunkett. But what he actually said doesn't quite amount to a "mauling": "We need to remember that Ed has only been opposition leader for eight months and it took David Cameron two years to establish himself in the public eye. However, the next year will prove vital in creating momentum and a sense of direction."
I'm not sure Ed Miliband or his closest advisers would disagree with any of that. And I doubt, either, that they'll be losing any sleep over the fact that Bill Kenwright (yes, that Bill Kenwright: theatrical impresario and chairman of Everton FC) thinks Miliband should "work on his leadership skills".
Simon Walters in the Mail on Sunday tries to stoke the fires of fratricidal antagonism between the Miliband brothers in his report on Mehdi Hasan and James Macintyre's biography of the Labour leader, which is serialised in that paper today. Walters says the book paints "a less-than-flattering portrait" of its subject. Knowing Mehdi and James as I do, I think I'll reserve judgement until I've read the whole thing (it's published a week tomorrow).
By far the most interesting and substantial discussion of Miliband's leadership comes in the Observer, which has asked a number of left-of-centre intellectuals and policy experts to give their verdict on Ed. Paul Hackett, director of the Smith Institute, speaks for most of those of invited to pass judgement when asked for his view of Miliband's leadership so far:
[It's] still too early to judge. He's struggling to project himself as a strong leader and has yet to connect effectively with the "squeezed middle". However, he has made a clear break with New Labour and opened up space for a wide-ranging policy rethink.
Unfortunately, that sort of temperate, measured analysis is not the stuff of which front-page headlines are made.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















18 comments
Poor Indu Pendent, I think that is latin for " Clueless ".
With the economy heading south, Miliband will have to explain to voters, we are on an economic path which will lead to higher unemployment, tax rises, more poverty and a shrinking middle class.
*sighs*
So.. Take the advice of Blunkett and Pressa.
1)Get 2 jags
2)shag the secretary
3)Fast track a passport for an Immigrant
4) ..see 2)
oooh and croquet on the lawn...now that is presona...LoL
Labour had a long run in government. Before them, The Conservatives, had a long run. They managed to find a leader that they mostly all agreed on in Cameron and got behind him, presenting themselves united as a party to the electorate. I'm not so sure the problem is Ed Milliband, but a general lack of solidarity in the Labour party themselves. The various leaks etc of Labour documents go to show the problem they have of uniting as a team. For a moment, after Ed Miliband was elected, they looked like they were emerging as a stronger team, looking new and refreshed. But with Ed Balls figuring so prominently, Labour already seem to be reverting back to a small clique of the usual circle where egos are getting in the way of politics.
Sam n
I believe Ed at the PMQs he looks too laid back. If his performance don't improve the party may dump him.
Ed has similarity to Ian Dumcan Smith, and the Tories got rid of him as their leader, didn't they?
-------------------
How the Hell is he similar to IDS?
Ed has won many of the PMQs. The Tory u-turn on the NHS came pretty swiftly after Miliband won an PMQs on it, ditto the u-turn on sentencing.
Cameron had a PMQ's refrain of "These pre-scripted questions", to which a cpl of weeks later Miliband retorts, "these pre-scripted answers won't do". Cameron was visibly shaken and hasn't used that since.
And I remember Hague regularly wiping the floor with Blair, he still got trounced in 2001.
What I see so far is the Blairites going for the good old Labour, civil war in opposition. And if New Labour want it, they can bloody get it back at them. They don't own the bloody party.
If they start this, do not expect anyone to forget it. No-one forgives this sort of behaviour, not the public, not the party.
I will not fight for a bunch of tyrants, wanting the parl party to choose leaders and agendas, nor will I fight for that limp agenda on D Miliband's speech.
In fact, I put Balls last on my leadership preferences, for two reasons. He was at the Treasury that deregulated banking and allowed PRIVATE sector debts and house prices to rise to such shocking levels; the other reason was his plotting. I did not trust, and he has a long way to go to win that back.
But the incessant attacks of those such as Hodges is just a reminder of how brutal and Machiavellian new Labour is. If they are back, I'll be out.
Almost as much as muscling out the real PM, standing in an election of one and becoming the worst Prime Minister ever and then being shown the door at the first real election you stand in.
The right have been in the vanguard of de-regulation for over thirty years.
Didn't Osborne praise Ireland in 2006 for de-regulating and accused Brown of being barrier to prosperity.
Strange how conservatives re-write history.
dont people realise all this backstabbing and criticism is a compliment to ed miliband, the timing is no coincidence all coming from the right wing media with the help of the blue brigade i.e. tom bradby,tru blue voice of self importance nick robinson,and of course sadam boulton of fair and balanced sky news, then they up the tempo by getting very bitter ex ministers and mps from the blairite right wing of the party to try give it all credence amongst voters,this story will only effect the westminster village because most people are not interested in it and are not stupid enough to be told what to think. if anyone gets the chance try watching the drama A VERY BRITISH COUP ,you will get a rough idea of what is going on, its not that ed miliband is weak,its the total reverse they are scared of him because he has humility and empathy and the voters can connect with this, rather then the slimy condescending i know whats best for you attitude that spews out of cameron and gideon osborne!!,so get ready people this character assassination will happen for the next four years.
But I could'a been a contender! David Milliband lost the Labour leadership to a narrow decision on points. He has expressed no sour grapes. Ed won within the rules.
So did David Cameron! Very close contest - with David Davis ahead until the very last second. Was it a fix? Your guess is as good as ours.
It's called competition, folks!
The print media are in competition every minute of every day. As Harry Grebb a boxer from the Jack Johnson era used to answer the fight reporter's question "Did you use your thumbs, Harry? -"Sure, what's thumbs for?'
Points Decision
David Cameron did not get a majority, so he has failed to engage with the voters. David Cameron will never be a Real PM and that must hurt.
Ed Miliband stands little chance of making a success of his leadership if even Labour supporters like Mehdi Hasan and James Macintyre write cash in books such as this and serialised in the right wing rag that is the Mail On Sunday.
Let's take the story as Gospel. "Senior party figures say they were wrong to elect him and give him a year to prove himself".
Then what? "Senior party figures" would then have to get the support of 20% of Labour MPs to force an election. Would they get it, especially If Labour continues to be ahead in the polls?
Meh.
Right wing press goes on the offensive after AoC attacks on coalition.
Left leaning press pulled into the "latest story" and respond thus keeping the non-story alive and giving it more credibility.
Do the press think the general public are STUPID?
It's not just the squeezed middle he is not connecting with - or the Labour Party generally.
I don't care that he has only been in power eight months and it took Cameron two years, the Labour Party and Ed need to establish themselves in the public eye by actually fighting this coalition government and standing up for the ordinary man or woman and holding to the founding principles of the Labour Party would be a pretty good platform to start from.
The coalition should be being trounced politically and yet it isn't, there's no effective opposition on anything and as someone who returned to the Labour fold post Blair, I am seriously questioning why. I don't recognise the Labour Party anymore.
As for the papers, well Ed and the Labour Party need to get their act together and quickly because we all know once the papers get their teeth into something, they don't let go and whilst there may well be no credible evidence for some of their summisations, mud sticks and people buy it.
The media are not going to let go as it sells too much advertising space. They will keep revisiting between now and the next election.
Ed needs to toughen up an loose his image as a fresh-out-of-posh-school naieve weak puppy. He's not yet ready to match Cameron and hes been put into the leader chair too soon.
It would be OK if he was charismatic and people felt sorry for him but they dont.
There is a way out - he can divert attention to Ed Balls who is a media nightmare for the party which is waiting to happen.
I believe Ed needs to step up his constructive attack on the coalition governments mishandlings e.g. Economics, NHS reform etc. especially at the PMQs he looks too laid back. If his performance don't improve the party may dump him. Ed has similarity to Ian Dumcan Smith, and the Tories got rid of him as their leader, didn't they?
Sam N
Ed Balls does Labour proud and gives lessons in making friends and influencing people:
http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/31346/ed-balls-nazi-costume-attacked-v...
Nice guy.
Ed M should choose his friends more carefully.
Post new comment