Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Willetts put his faith in competition

The coalition remains determined to marketise higher education.

Downing Street is said to fear that when the public hears the words "Conservative reform" it understands "mass privatisation" but that's not a charge David Willetts is afraid of. His vision of a market-driven higher education system remains in tact and is at the heart of the government's much-delayed white paper on the subject. Universities, he declared on the Today programme, should "not be in the mindset that they are part of the public sector."

Under the new tuition fees system, he emphasised, money will follow the student, allowing the best universities to expand and putting others (he failed to say) at risk of bankruptcy. In an attempt to persuade students (consumers?) that fees of up to £9,000 a year - the highest public university fees in the world - represent value for money, he promised better information on issues such as contact hours and job prospects (there are now 83 applicants for each graduate vacancy), as well as a charter setting out students' rights. With around two-thirds of institutions planning to charge full whack, the idea, presumably, is that this will allow students to distinguish excellence from mediocrity.

But listening to Willetts it's hard to avoid the sense that he has assumed what he needs to prove, namely that competition will drive up quality. He also had alarmingly little to say about access. With evidence that some pupils are already being deterred from applying by higher fees, the question Labour will ask is whether the coalition is offering quality for the few or for the many.

P.S. As an aside, it's worth noting that Willetts, the universities minister, will present the white paper in the Commons at 3:30pm today, not Vince Cable, the man who, as Secretary of State for Business, is ultimately responsible for the reforms. Indeed, it's hard to remember the last time that Cable defended the measures in public. Is Vince running scared?

Tags: David Willetts  tuition fees

7 comments

JamesB1's picture

And in one fell swoop Higher Education has been obliterated for the normal person.

For the Tories this is a crowning achievement, for everyone else it is a disaster.

Arturo Bandini's picture

2 parties that both failed to win an election then set about a programme that neither has a mandate for.

That's what I call a coup-alition!

Bratiaith's picture

once upon a time there were a few non Philistines in the Tory Party

Mrs.Josephine Hyde-Hartley's picture

One wonders what is becoming of those citizens who cannot and do not view debt as a good way to achieve one's goals.

Surely there must be an exception to any rule that otherwise seems to interfere with competition in such a basic way. One would have thought there's something drastically wrong in a society where citizens can't get something so basic without having to go into debt.It's only education!

The only way to truly stay ahead of any so-called curve or trend is surely by appreciating the individuals capacity to save up, access and buy something without one becoming deprived of privacy and dignity as a result of some preposterous pretentious market type process - as do any other independent, autonomous human beings capable of true innovation and leadership.

tuttifrutti's picture

So, a market driven higher education. Does this mean that when universities fail to deliver their obligations they can be sued? When they start fiddling the figures to make their courses appear more profitable in terms of graduate employment that they will be censured by the Advertising Authority? And of course, some consumers will choose not to buy. Sounds like some awful dystopia.
As for Vince Cable, its a bit late running scared one you've sold your soul to the devil.

Mr Danger's picture

"Applications for history and for philosophy are down by 1.5%, while those for linguistics or classics have fallen by 4.2%. Applications for European languages have dropped by 0.8%, but non-European languages have increased by the same amount.

However, applications for maths and computer science have risen by 6.5%, while for engineering they have climbed by 4.7%. Nursing has grown by 14%."

Result!

Willp's picture

In the real world, Sam, the government's own funding agency HEFCE has warned that cut-throat competition risks damaging our global reputation.
And the Times Higher Education magazine described the UK as a potential "treasure chest" for privateers.
Even in the USA itself, the for-profits are under attack, with US senators describing them as akin to the 'sub-prime mortgage industry'.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets