Red Tory: Gove on his union days
The Education Secretary "was an active striker" at the Press and Journal during its bitter confrontation with the NUJ in the 1980s.
By Duncan Robinson Published 27 June 2011 14:32
As teaching unions and the Department for Education go head-to-head over a proposed strike this Thursday, it is worth looking at Michael Gove's past involvement in industrial action. In an interview with the New Statesman in 2010, the education secretary discussed his role in the National Union of Journalist's fight against the Press and Journal in Aberdeen in the late 1980s. Gove's former union activities certainly gives the recent dispute an interesting context.
Gove was a trainee reporter at the Press when the industrial dispute broke out, which, he argues, tied his hands when it came to whether or not he should take part.
"I didn't think the dispute was a good idea. I was against going on strike, but I'd only just arrived. The majority of friends and colleagues felt very strongly about this. I was the new kid. There were people whom I liked and admired who felt they were being mistreated. I had joined the union. I felt that if you were in an organisation, you should generally respect the rules and the quirks of decision-making. I thought it was wrong to go on strike but I didn't feel that the principle was an ignoble one.
Critics have levelled charges of hypocrisy at the Education Secretary. This amusing photo of a young, bespectacled Gove on the picket line adds to that feeling. Gove, however, defends NUJ's strike as it had - he claims - legitimate grievances, something which he appears to think that the teachers lack.
"We weren't striking because we were demanding a massive pay increase at an inappropriate time. There was an issue. The strike ringleaders were victimised. We can argue whether this was provocation on the management's part or the union's naivety. We were all dismissed and it became a very bitter dispute. And in the end most people never worked for Aberdeen Journals again. Some chose to cross the picket line, some were selectively re-employed."
Gove's days as a rabble-rousing, unionised hack are, however, well and truly over. He left the NUJ in 2007 - two years after he entered parliament - because of the union's stance on Israel. "Tory leaves union" is not exactly headline news. But, as Francis Beckett points out in the excellent profile, going on strike for union recognition as a trainee journalist in 1989 "required. . . courage". It is somewhat surprising, then, that Gove has taken such an aggressive stance on the teaching unions. Rather than using his own experiences to try and reach a compromise, Gove has gone in looking for a fight. He'll certainly get one. Whether anyone will win remains to be seen.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















10 comments
"We weren't striking because we were demanding a massive pay increase at an inappropriate time."
So far, so like the teachers.
A case of poacher turned gamekeeper? Two-faced? Hypocrite? Do unto others..........?
No doubt Gove resembles the unfortunate 'Smike' and has no qualms about trading on this happy likeness.
He's still introducing the same nightmarish Victorian education promoted by Dicken's Mr Sqeers and Mr Gradgrind. Know your place and accept it. What a scam. And still the old divide and conquer routine. Parents against teachers. And the employers know who butters their bread, and adds lashings of jam.
Next off, school children will be referred to as 'pupils'.
And the state school system. First class; second class; third class; and steerage.
What about the 'public' school name tag? Superior class; perhaps exceptional.
Yes, Govey is being hypocritical. I was the deputy strike leader at the Aberdeen Journals NUJ dispute after the US management de-recognised the union. We were out for a year. Not a lot of fun. Govey was a very useful "backroom boy" who would sweet-talk local Tories into supporting our cause and I don't recall him being blackmailed into backing the strike. By the way, this must have been a very rare visit to the picket line!!
Personally I find it hard to understand how the current arrangements concerning one's future pension - which by definition is a benefit that's not work related (because one can only take it when one's normal job is done ie finished for one reason or another) -can be treated to any kind of grievance/disciplinary type process. Any dialogue has to be constructive surely - meaning everyone who might be concerned should be included. So I'm not at all sure that it's reasonable to apparently limit the discussions to government officials and unions.
Better to use a decent raising a concerns policy to make more inclusive time and space for improvement.
It is not uncommon for most to change conviction and modus operandi where money calls and status satisfies.
Viva John Pilger - a man of integrity! How about him being our new education boffin?
Duncan writes, "It is somewhat surprising, then, that Gove has taken such an aggresive (sic) stance on the teaching unions."
No, it's no surprise, given his role in this deeply reactionary government.
Hardly earth shattering -it doesn't sound as if he was one of those leftwingers/ex communists in his yong days [he always looks 16] who swung extreme right when the opportunity presented itself [as happened with some journalists in the right wing press]. He was probably a prat then and a prat now.
@Willp Apologies for the typo.
I know, it's not exactly a shock, but it is still interesting. How many other front-benchers have been on a picket line?
I notice the NS didn't quote this frome the Beckett article:
"He was an active striker, willingly taking his turn on picket duty and going on a small delegation to Strasbourg to press the union's case, according to the Father of the Chapel (shop steward) at the time, Ian Campbell."
Quite a firebrand,I'd say.
Who cares about the unions. They don't matter.
Post new comment