The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

It's too early for the Lib Dems to declare "victory"

The battle over Andrew Lansley's NHS reforms isn't over yet.

He may once have boasted that Andrew Lansley's NHS reforms were in the Liberal Democrat manifesto but Nick Clegg is still hailing their dilution as his biggest "victory" since the coalition began. The cause of such excitement is the publication by Steve Field, the GP who led the government's "listening exercise", of a report into the reforms, although most of the key changes were announced in David Cameron's speech last week. To summarise, the 2013 deadline for the creation of GP-led consortiums will be "relaxed"; membership of the consortiums will be opened up to hospital doctors and nurses, and the main duty of Monitor, the health regulator, will be to promote "integration", not "competition".

To the consternation of the Tories, Clegg has published a "scorecard" showing that the Lib Dems have secured 11 of the 13 changes demanded by its conference. In the Independent, a jubilant Shirley Williams declares that, thanks to her party's efforts, "the Prime Minister will be able to say with confidence that the NHS is safe in the Coalition's hands".

More cautious types are reminding the Lib Dems that the political wrangling isn't over yet. Clegg, Cameron and Andrew Lansley will issue their own response to the report at a joint event tomorrow, and the Tory right are using the intervening period to demand a limit to the concessions.

Then there's the question of NHS funding, a landmine primed to explode at some point in the near future. As I noted last week, Cameron is on course to break his pledge to increase spending on the health service - higher inflation means that it faces a real-terms cut. The coalition's NHS woes are far from over.

But it would still be churlish to deny that this is some of the best press the Lib Dems have had since the coalition was formed. The government's decision to "modify" its £26,000 benefits cap has already been successfully spun as another victory for Clegg's party. Whether the voters will give them any credit, however, remains to be seen.

6 comments

ang's picture

Clegg would have been victorious if he and his party would have voted against the Lansley bill in the firstplace, saving 10 months of utter confusion and anxiety for those who work in the NHS.
Like Cameron and his recent 5 pledges stunt, Clegg is having to be seen to be protecting the NHS from his 'own' policies. Does the man not understand that the public are not stupid and can see right through him.

elrob's picture

ang
Clegg would have been victorious if he and his party would have voted against the Lansley bill in the firstplace, saving 10 months of utter confusion and anxiety for those who work in the NHS.
-------------
Not to mention Clegg's nodding Churchill dog routine every time Cameron made an attempt to sell the darned bill at various PMQs.

Or maybe we shouldn't mention PMQs after this past week.

mike cobley's picture

The whole point of the NHS reforms was never to get everything that the Tories and their investment/banking mates wanted all at once, rather it was to ensure that the main foundations of the postwar welfare state are efficiently and comprehensively undermined. Cameron et al are in the end happy to go along with Clegg's bandaid counter-reforms now that the main avenues leading to a private sector jamboree are now open.

Lou's picture

Groan cue much heralding of trumpets from OG then on how wonderful the LDs are.

Still don't know about funding and just how much private consortia will be involved and I don't think a four week listening exercise is enough frankly.

Beware of LDs bearing gifts!

Suzanne's picture

Clegg is increasingly looking like a Walter Mitty character. He's contradicting himself time and again. His party helped write this bill. Not one objection from the Lib Dem parliamentary party until the election drubbing.
The bill was very much along the lines of what was in the David Laws chapter in the orange book.
His opposition was opportunism of the worst kind. It's also totally wrong for the Lib Dems to claim credit for this also. What about all the resistance from the various professions involved in the NHS and the powerful public outrage.
The Tories on their own would have had to make similar concessions as it would otherwise mean severe political consequences.
The Lib Dems and especially Clegg have no right to claim credit for these changes

poliphobis's picture

Any opposition to the Tories inbred aim of privatising health care is to be encouraged , be it from the Libdems or anyone else. However , Mr.Cobley's point is well made, thus it is to be hoped that there are those brighter than Mr. Clegg in his party who will so counsel him.

Latest tweets