The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

How Peru is poised to defy Washington

Fujimori versus Humala is a battle of neoliberal continuity against progressive reform.

On 10 April, Peruvians went to the polls in the first round of the country's presidential elections. No candidate obtained the 50 per cent share necessary to assume the job outright, and so, in just over a month, Ollanta Humala and Keiko Fujimori will go head to head in a contest that has ramifications that go far beyond the country's borders.

The duel certainly represents a clash of ideologies. Fujimori, aged just 35, is the daughter of the former president Alberto, currently serving a 25-year jail term for crimes against humanity committed during his ten-year reign between 1990 and 2000.

Harden your lines

Despite his transgressions, a significant number of people in Peru are grateful to Fujimori Sr for crushing the Shining Path guerrilla movement that waged a bloody, 20-year insurgency against the state. He also wins praise for reducing inflation and initiating food distribution programmes in poor districts.

Keiko, who enjoys near-blanket support from Peru's corporate media, has promised to institute peripheral welfare schemes in an effort to secure support from the nation's poorest. However, she endorses the neoliberal economic principles that have earned the country a deserved reputation as one of the world's most unequal societies.

Many also fear that she would pardon her father and his cronies and take a hard line against indigenous groups clamouring for a bigger slice of the nation's resource revenue.

She has endorsed the "security policies" of the former Colombian president and US darling Álvaro Uribe, who presided over a draconian police state, smashed the unions and gave weapons and impunity to paramilitary death squads prior to leaving office last year.

Human hybrid

Humala, who took 31.7 per cent of votes compared to Fujimori's 23.5 per cent in the first round, is a former army officer who has positioned himself as something of a hybrid of Hugo Chávez's radical wealth redistribution and Lula da Silva's more moderate social inclusion policies.

He was vocal in condemning the government's crackdown against a protest by mine workers in April, during which nine people were killed,. Such incidents are becoming increasingly frequent under the current president, Alan García. Humala attributes the labour unrest to a lack of dialogue between community groups and a government that tends to side with the interests of foreign capital.

Humala has pledged to renegotiate contracts between the state and multinational companies operating in Peru, particularly in the mining sector. He says his aim is to channel more money into desperately needed social welfare schemes and boost the country's pension reserves.

Polls place Humala 6 points ahead of Fujimori as the run-off approaches. Victory would make Peru the latest Latin American country to elect a progressive leader in defiance of the Washington Consensus. That has not gone unnoticed in the US, all too aware of its dwindling influence in a region once regarded as its "backyard".

12 comments

Luddite's picture

What is it about third world politics, it's always replaces one form of despotism with another?

Tony's picture

Sam - there is unsurprisingly no evidence at all supporting your absurd and baseless affirmation. Luddite - you seem to pop up after a variety of political pieces making senseless comments.

OllieVargas's picture

I am from Bolivia and Evo Morales has done great things for our country, there are still problems of course but if latino govts carry on modelling thmselves as US puppets inequality will persist. There is a long way to go but the work of Chavez and Morales has made such differences to peoples live as i believe Humala will.

OllieVargas's picture

@luddite, please explain how Humala is a despot?

south pacific's picture

IMO the people of Peru and all of south America must choose whether they want to be a slave of the US or walk tall as independent nations.

The world does not consist of the US alone.

swss's picture

Luddite judging by your long posting career here at NS you are utterly opposed to anything that may be vaguely leftist. For the sake of your blood pressure why don't you emigrate to the Telegraph or something?

Benedict's picture

swss,

If Luddite posted on the Telegraph site, he'd just be ignored as one of a hundred nutters with similar views.

Here, he's one of the few. Just ignore him.

Riaz Ahmad's picture

To live with dignity and respect, nations need to build America free zones. Corporate America is a paracite, sucking the blood of the worlds poor. In this day and age, no nation can be any ones back yard.

writeoff's picture

Sam, if you want to seen Union representatives murdered, look to Colombia, or Guatemala or any other US puppet government. Any reduction in US influence in LatAm will benefit the region.

Luddite's picture

OllieVargas
29 April 2011 at 11:02
@luddite, please explain how Humala is a despot. Give it time!!

Sam's picture

I hear Chavez has done great things for the poor in Venezuala.

Just a shame so many anti-Chavez union members get murdered with the killers rarely being brought to justice.

chrizizi's picture

======== http://ta.gg/51m ===========

======== http://ta.gg/51m ===========

======== http://ta.gg/51m ===========

======== http://ta.gg/51m ===========

======== http://ta.gg/51m ===========

======== http://ta.gg/51m ===========

Latest tweets