Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Bradley Manning’s lawyer speaks out

David Coombs reports that the soldier’s treatment has just got even worse.

In her piece in this week's magazine on the case of Private Bradley Manning, the 23-year-old American soldier suspected of leaking classified documents to WikiLeaks, Sophie Elmhirst describes the dreadful conditions in which the young man is being held at the Marine Corps Brig in Quantico, Virginia:

Manning is under a Prevention of Injury (PoI) order, which limits his social contact, exercise, sleep and access to external stimuli such as newspapers or television . . . He spends 23 hours a day alone in his cell. The hour he is allowed out, he is taken to an empty room and walks in circles. If he is caught exercising in his cell, he is forced to stop. At night, Manning is stripped to his underwear and has to sleep under blankets that he says give him carpet burn. He is usually woken several times throughout the night by guards. PoI orders are usually issued when prisoners present a risk to themselves or others and are supposed to be temporary. Manning has been under the order since he arrived at the Brig in July.

On his blog, Manning's lawyer David Coombs reports that his client's request to have the Prevention of Injury order withdrawn was refused on Wednesday:

On Wednesday March 2, 2011, PFC Manning was told that his Article 138 complaint requesting that he be removed from maximum custody and Prevention of Injury (PoI) Watch had been denied by the Quantico commander, Colonel Daniel J Choike. Understandably frustrated by this decision after enduring over seven months of unduly harsh confinement conditions, PFC Manning inquired of the Brig operations officer what he needed to do in order to be downgraded from maximum custody and PoI. As even Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell has stated, PFC Manning has been nothing short of "exemplary" as a detainee. Additionally, Brig forensic psychiatrists have consistently maintained that there is no mental health justification for the PoI Watch imposed on PFC Manning. In response to PFC Manning's question, he was told that there was nothing he could do to downgrade his detainee status and that the Brig simply considered him a risk of self-harm. PFC Manning then remarked that the PoI restrictions were "absurd" and sarcastically stated that if he wanted to harm himself, he could conceivably do so with the elastic waistband of his underwear or with his flip-flops.

In a development that one might describe as Kafkaesque, were it not quite so sinister, that remark of Manning's has been used as justification for, as Coombs puts it, "increas[ing] the restrictions imposed upon him under the guise of being concerned that PFC Manning was a suicide risk". Manning is now being stripped naked at night and is not allowed to keep even his underwear on. But, as Coombs points out, Manning is allowed to wear clothes and underwear during the day, "with no apparent concern that he will harm himself during this time period".

The decision to strip Manning completely at night is clearly punitive – indeed, it is, as Andrew Sullivan rightly notes, sadistic: "We all hoped that under Obama, brutal treatment of military prisoners and lies about it would end. In this case, they haven't."

Tags: Bradley Manning

22 comments

Kitty Antonik Wakfer's picture

The recently publicized measures (http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2011/03/07/anonymous-hackers-targe...) being taken by the group "Anonymous" are far beyond what I have been recommending in recent online posts and comments regarding the inhumane order givers and enforcers of those orders directed at Bradley Manning. My twitlonger of March 5 http://tl.gd/94ijbk contains a link to the one online photo of CWO Denise Barnes, Quantico Brig Commander I was able to find at the time.

My purpose is to simply put the name/photo/location information out in the public sphere to enable others to treat these order givers and enforcers as repulsive. The details of what is being done to Bradley Manning needs to be common knowledge, at whose direction and, most importantly, who is doing it! Everyone who comes in contact with CWO Denise Barnes needs to be aware of the details of the orders she has issued; those who disagree with her actions will be repulsed and want nothing to do with her if she fails to respond to their reasoned logic to alter those orders to ones that are humane.
The same photo/name/location information is needed for the same purpose for all those who enforce CWO Barnes' order since the enforcers are truly the key! Without the enforcers of her orders (which must surely come from higher up) , those words would be nothing but sounds in the air or markings on physical media (even when then electronically transmitted).

Holding others responsible for their actions and being responsible for one's own actions are necessities in an orderly society. Much of that has gone by the wayside in the current one even for those who are well known and for whom actions can be directly related to their direction/order - the current and previous President are prime examples. I have written in general on this subject, one is "Tax/Regulation Protests are Not Enough: Relationship of Self-Responsibility and Social Order" - http://selfsip.org/focus/protestsnotenough.html

My concern with "Operation Bradical" as it is described is that it may tend to make "victims" of the issuers and enforcers of the inhumane orders focused on Bradley Manning in the eyes of very many. It also does not bring into action these many others who disapprove of the inhumane treatment but rather enables them to remain passive viewers of "Anonymous". This is part of the problem - the lack of personal evaluation and accountability by the vast majority in the population.

Mr Woogy's picture

I thought you could not shoot the crap about your client in press before a trial, stil I am not a eagle legal lawyer. Also are conditions worse than Wilileaks in the despicable hell hole known as Sweden. The UN. is investigating the use of Abba Gold Complimations to torture prisoners, the winner takes it all.

lavinia moore's picture

What a strange conjunction of events we are seeing.
We have Mr Obama and Ms Clinton et al pontificating about how dreadful Mr Gadaffi is for attacking "his own people", and making all of us wonder whether that is indeed worse than bombing the hell out of someone else's people. But it gets even more confusingn when we are reminded yet again, if we needed reminding, about how that government is committing Human Rights crimes and breaching the rules laid down by the Convention on Civil and Political Rights etc by depriving dissidents and others who are United Sstates citzens of thos same rights that now others can have- even Libyans- but Manning cannot.
Us is Us and Them is Them and never the twain shall meet. I guess Bradley Manning once thought he was an "Us": now surely he knows he is a "Them". That ought to put the fear of God into every American, including Mr Manning, because they know now, since Abu Ghraib and since Guantanamo what happens in USA run federal prisons and gulags.
My last question is that which all those who defend human rights should be asking. When are the real war criminals and those who have committed Human Rights crimes going to face their people? And I am not onoly talking about the Libyan leader.

Mr Woogy's picture

@Kitty Antonik Wakfer
08 March 2011 at 01:42
The recently publicized measures (http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2011/03/07/anonymous-h...) being taken by the group "Anonymous" are far beyond what I have been recommending in recent online posts and comments regarding the inhumane order givers and enforcers of those orders directed at Bradley Manning. My twitlonger of March 5 http://tl.gd/94ijbk contains a link to the one online photo of CWO Denise Barnes, Quantico Brig Commander I was able to find at the time.

My purpose is to simply put the name/photo/location information out in the public sphere to enable others to treat these order givers and enforcers as repulsive. The details of what is being done to Bradley Manning needs to be common knowledge, at whose direction and, most importantly, who is doing it! Everyone who comes in contact with CWO Denise Barnes needs to be aware of the details of the orders she has issued; those who disagree with her actions will be repulsed and want nothing to do with her if she fails to respond to their reasoned logic to alter those orders to ones that are humane.

The same photo/name/location information is needed for the same purpose for all those who enforce CWO Barnes' order since the enforcers are truly the key! Without the enforcers of her orders (which must surely come from higher up) , those words would be nothing but sounds in the air or markings on physical media (even when then electronically transmitted).

Holding others responsible for their actions and being responsible for one's own actions are necessities in an orderly society. Much of that has gone by the wayside in the current one even for those who are well known and for whom actions can be directly related to their direction/order - the current and previous President are prime examples. I have written in general on this subject, one is "Tax/Regulation Protests are Not Enough: Relationship of Self-Responsibility and Social Order" - http://selfsip.org/focus/protestsnotenough.html

My concern with "Operation Bradical" as it is described is that it may tend to make "victims" of the issuers and enforcers of the inhumane orders focused on Bradley Manning in the eyes of very many. It also does not bring into action these many others who disapprove of the inhumane treatment but rather enables them to remain passive viewers of "Anonymous". This is part of the problem - the lack of personal evaluation and accountability by the vast majority in the population.
Post your comment

Hello Kitty were you ever in the Reign of Terror ? What a nasty piece of work you appear to be underneath your faux liberal pretensions!

grinningjohnson's picture

We all fell for Obama's schmultz. He essentially won the Nobel Prize for Public Speaking. Geoffrey Robertson should stop swooning at Assange and actually defend the real victim of truthtelling: Bradley Manning.

Chris's picture

To think we were excited when Obama was elected. Things were going to be so much better - weren't they?

Prevention of Injury? More like Promotion of Injury.

Taking away his underwear? Not just sadistic but perverted.

After this kind of treatment Manning really will have mental health problems and be at risk of suicide. Stopping him from exercising in his cell? What's that all about? Amnesty International would label that "cruel and unusual punishment" but presumably USA hasn't signed the Convention Against Torture. Or chooses to ignore it. Could be a warning to any other potential whistleblower that they too will end up naked in a cell if they dare to speak out. A bit like Gaddafi's Libya, really.

F Smith's picture

I can't help comparing the mental torture that Bradley Manning is now suffering from the American military, i.e. his own countrymen to that suffered by Louis Zamperini (and thousands of others) by the hands of the Japanese during WW2 (re: Unbroken by Laura Hillenbrand).

CriticalEye21's picture

Here's a German documentary (in English) on Bradley Manning's plight:

http://bit.ly/grHK6y

Elizabeth L.'s picture

To the Blogger to whom I bestow the name of "Kitty Litter" to:
You want the infor of Brig Guards? I was a Brig Guard at Quantico. I'll be happy to give you MY information. Come to my house and let's see if your First Amendment outweighs my Second Amendment.

J Sutherland's picture

The Marine brig at Quantico is a military prison. Treatment is harsh. Should not come as a big shock to anyone. Were he released into the general population I doubt he would escape beatings. The inmates of brigs tend to be violent troublemakers who would see Pvt Manning as someone who put their fellow Marines at risk.
Smart remarks to brig wardens, police officers , immigration agents and the like have consequences.
Is he in danger of harming himself? Who knows. He will spend most of the rest of his life in a military prison. Not a cheery prospect.

brigrat5831's picture

Hello Kitty Litter. I too was a Brig Guard at Quantico and can honestly tell you Detainee Manning is receiving no harsher treatment than any other person that conducts his/herself in the manner he has. If a prisoner/detainee enters the facility and even makes the slightest hint about harming his/herself, whether joking or not, they are listed as a suicide risk and put in solitary confinement indefinitely.
There is also protective solitary confinement for those high profile prisoner/detainees who may be harmed if put in general population. I assure you Detainee Manning is one such case.
Marines are professional warriors that take and enforce orders better than any other service out there. There is nothing personal with these people. They are trained to follow policy and follow orders.

I think it's just easy for others to demonize them and sympathize with someone who has a very creative lawyer. When your client has committed the crime and you basically have no case it is the oldest trick in the book to try and get their sentence reduced by showing they are being mistreated in the confinement facility. You and everybody on this blog are having the wool pulled over your eyes and now you want to attack the people enforcing the law and ensuring your freedom. To complain about treatment is one thing but to call to action the harassment and maltreatment of a warrior and their family is just plain disgusting. If you think a Marine who has dedicated their life to the service of YOU and all other FREE PEOPLE in the WORLD should be attacked because he/she is doing what is required of them, then you are plain disgusting as well. Shame on you.
I personally don't care what Detainee Manning did or why. The deification of Detainee Manning is simply a result of misinformation. He took an oath and violated the trust which was bestowed upon him for taking that oath. He should be punished accordingly.

Finally I will say this: If you think attacking CWO Denise Barnes and her family will cause her or any Marine in that facility to second guess their decisions you are dead wrong. If nothing else it will force them to maintain the fair, firm and impartial treatment of all prisoners/detainees they have sworn to uphold. Think of it this way...did the Marines at Belleau Woods back down in the face of certain death? Did the Marines on Iwo Jima stop pushing up the hills when their brothers were being blown to pieces next to them? You hopefully know the answer to those questions. Now do you think Marines are going to back down or dig in deeper when some sniveling puke sleeping under the blanket of freedom they provide starts trying to harass them? The thought is laughable. I will pray for you because that is who I am. I will pray for Detainee Manning as well. But rest assured I will pray much harder for my brothers and sisters enforcing the UCMJ and ensuring my freedom.

Kitty Needs a Restraining Order's picture

What you are encouraging is harassment, plain and simple. I don't care what sort of sugar coated spin you put on it. Anyone that contacts any member of the brig staff should be slapped with harassment charges and a restraining order.

Pre trial confinement exists for a reason. Learn the difference between that and "adjudged."

How ignorant of you to assume that the CO has nothing to do all day but stand outside Manning's cell and stare at him. Get a clue. Try doing a little research and familiarize yourself with something before you spout off about it. A female brig guard cannot observe a male prisoner who is on suicide watch. Brig rules and regulations aren't exactly that hard to find.

If a prisoner makes a comment that leads the CO to believe he *MAY* be entertaining the notion of hurting himself, they are authorized to take away clothing and anything else that can be used to cause bodily harm. You are slandering Denise Barnes and organizing a witch hunt against her and her staff for doing what is within her regulation in order to prevent a detainee from hurting himself. Oh and by the way, Manning doesn't stand at attention all day either.

Inhumane? What a joke. Only in your little fantasy world where you blow out of proportion things you honestly do not have any real world knowledge about.

roger's picture

As an Honorably discharged Naval Petty Officer I believe that every Officer found complicit in Mannings detention treatment should be Court Martialed publickly because an explanation is in order. Here that Chief of Naval Operations??

Kitty Needs a Restraining Order's picture

"PFC Manning then remarked that the PoI restrictions were "absurd" and sarcastically stated that if he wanted to harm himself, he could conceivably do so with the elastic waistband of his underwear or with his flip-flops"

Things that make you go hmmm....Manning himself just told you all that he has access to his own underwear and flip flops, but yet you persist in calling Denise Barnes a sexual sadist who "MAKES HIM STRIP NAKED"

Manning's own freaking comment above, whether sarcastic or joking is what's responsible for his current brig status. He verbalized two other ways he could think of to harm himself and you expect the CO to not take heed?

Where's the call for Manning to take responsibility for his own words and actions?

Elizabeth L.'s picture

Realize this, Kitty Litter: The Brig Guards of Quantico who SERVED with CWO Denise Barnes back in the days are standing by her side and ready to attest to her high level of professionalism and dedication to our Corps. Not to mention that she is a Veteran of Iraq, herself. She has been in this field for many years and is fully aware of what the policies and procedures of the brig are. You're going to have to get through a whole lot of us to get to her or any of her Marines.

Anti-FlagUSA's picture

I agree, Obama looks awful for letting this carry on. It's like something out of Fox's 24 :(

At least in Stalin's Russia they killed you quick.

whatevs's picture

I'm pretty sure he signed the contract. So whether he did the right thing or not, he still knowingly broke the ucmj. What did he think was gonna happen? And then he starts being a punk to his Marine gaurds. Real smart lol. AD Marine

Yet anther Brig Rat! V's picture

Sorry to burst your bubble, but he is in a brig, not a spa.

High profile detainee/prisoners are kept out of general population for their safety.

Suicide watch is for detainee/prisoners who make a statement that they may harm themselves. And all detainee/prisoners are treated the same on suicide watch.

I also served with CWO2 Barnes, she knows what she is doing. She is following SOP!

Mrs Nobody's picture

Bradley Manning suffers harsh inhuman treatment whilst the real criminals with the blood of over a million people on their hands - Bush and Blair - walk about the world free men and are receive millions of pounds for very little.

There is no justice in this world.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets