Defend UK Uncut, even if you don’t agree with their tactics
The anti-cuts movement should not be divided by the right’s narrative on violence at Saturday’s prot
By Daniel Trilling Published 28 March 2011 15:48
On Saturday, about half a million people took action in response to the coalition government's public-sector spending cuts. This is how I witnessed it.
The largest group disrupted traffic across a large section of central London as they marched from Embankment to Hyde Park, chanting slogans, banging pots and pans and blowing whistles and vuvuzelas. The cost of the damage caused by people littering and tramping across the grass in one of the country's best-loved public parks is yet to be assessed.
A much smaller group, perhaps of around a thousand, staged sit-ins at a number of West End shops in the early afternoon. This was followed by a rally in Soho Square, where campaigners were entertained by stand-up comedians and a well-known newspaper columnist. They then staged a final, peaceful sit-in, en masse, in the upmarket grocery store Fortnum & Mason. These people were arrested on leaving the shop, kept in the cells overnight and charged with aggravated trespass. (This illiberal law was introduced in 1994 as part of the widely opposed Criminal Justice Bill, and can be applied to anyone who "trespasses on land with the intention of disrupting, or intimidating those taking part in, lawful activity taking place on that or adjacent land".)
A smaller group still (the BBC's Paul Mason estimates 600) smashed the windows of and threw paint at shops and banks in the West End. From what I saw, there was no serious attempt to arrest those causing the damage.
There are two lessons that I think the anti-cuts movement (by which I mean anyone who turned out on Saturday) should take from this. First, there has been a great deal of sneering among advocates of "direct action" in the past few months at "A to B marches". I hope Saturday's march, which left me feeling exhilarated and hopeful for the prospect of building sustained opposition to the cuts, proves that bringing together a huge cross-section of society is valid and necessary action. Of course it doesn't change anything in isolation, but just think about how many people returned to their workplaces today, sharing their experiences with colleagues, realising that they're not alone in their fight and, with any luck, thinking about what to do next.
Second, there is a narrative developing among some sections of the left that UK Uncut wrecked Saturday's protest by diverting attention from the rally in Hyde Park and is somehow responsible for the "anarchist violence" focused on by most of the media. This plays into the hands of the right and needs to be stopped.
Had UK Uncut not been present, the property damage would have happened anyway, and the media still would have focused on it. Moreover, it's wrong to assume that anyone who took part in direct action is also a committed anti-capitalist. Some may be (as are some Labour Party members, and plenty of others who attended the official demonstration), but UK Uncut's central message – that corporations should pay their fair share of tax – is entirely compatible with a social-democratic movement. Nor is it one that alienates large numbers of voters.
Labour should be asking itself why the thousands of people who have taken part in UK Uncut actions since the autumn don't see the Parliamentary Labour Party as the best route through which to enforce a fair tax system. (Is it, perhaps, because Labour while in government proved unable to stop banks and corporations ripping off the state?)
There may be an argument about tactics, which all sides of the movement should consider. Was Fortnum & Mason the right target? Should the sit-in have taken place at the same time as the main march? But the outright hostility and disdain directed at UK Uncut from elsewhere within the left is damaging to the movement. As one Labour councillor I know (who is from the centre left of the party) said to me today: "I can't understand why some Labour people are so proprietorial about peaceful protest – perhaps it speaks to a wider insecurity about our role in opposition."
This morning, David Cameron issued a statement saying that those responsible for the damage on Saturday "need to be dealt with and to feel the full force of the law". It is imperative that those with the power to do so speak out in support of the UK Uncut protesters and make sure they are not collectively punished for the actions of others.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















48 comments
The fact is UK Uncut did ruin things. If you know anything about marketing then you'll know that UK Uncut are now a toxic brand and will drag down the whole movement.
If you're sincere then you'll ditch UK Uncut for the greater good. If you don't actually really want to change things, you just like being alternative and going against the mainstream then fine by all means keep defending them but you won't change diddly squat.
Longer response to "Sam" in moderation. Suffice to say, it's civil to suppose he's a naive idiot, but equally possible he's an Astroturf plant: either way he's wrong.
Labour needs to learn UKUncut are not the enemy.
I'm rational and I don't accept it Scotty.Read this and educate yourself young man.Probably the best explanation of the financial crisis out there.
Britain’s low-wage, unequal economy has also been an important contributory factor to the financial crash and the subsequent recession. Those whose wages fell behind borrowed more than they could afford, contributing to the credit crunch. Average household debt was 45 per cent in 1980 but rose to 157 per cent in 2005. And the decline in wages was made up by increased profits – much of which was used for financial speculation rather than productive business investment, helping drive the UK’s heavy reliance on finance and encouraging the over-investment that led to the crash.
http://www.tuc.org.uk/extras/unfairtomiddling.pdf
I would normally support UK Uncut in carrying out non- violent direct action such as sit ins in the premises of tax avoiding corporations ; and these have been highly successful when carried out as specific protests by UK Uncut supporters .But it was a massive tactical mistake to have tried to do any such thing on Saturday in an environment where UK Uncut could not exercise control over who got involved . Now you`ve just allowed the media to tar you with the same brush as the Black Bloc `anarchists `
By all means campaign against the offence of aggravated trespass, but glossing over the fact that it is currently an offence and that protesters also committed violent offences against people and property does your "campaign" no credit whatsoever.
In my private-sector workplace this morning all the talk was of how childish the hundreds of "protesters" who rioted were.
In the wealth-creating sector you have a serious image problem and very little sympathy for the small reductions in public spending that are inevitable.
It's not left/right Trilling, it's vested interests. The Guardian, The BBC, the right-wing press, all of them out in front, anticipating violence and trotting out the usual self-fulfilling rubbish about how any violence would negate the message of the march, which they were not interested in covering in depth anyway.
The UK armed forces are bombing the crap out of Libya right now, as well as in Iraq/Afghanistan. When they kill civilians/destroy people's property, does *that* negate the validity of their aims? No. So, a few broken windows and some policemen getting sick pay. Call it collateral damage.
Besides, we all know that if the protestors don't get violent, the violence will be supplied by police infiltrators. We've read the Mark Kennedy story and his (at least) 5 chums, these people organised entire protest groups, so the idea that there's no Rent-a-Mob being used to discredit *all* events of this type, in cahoots with the mainstream media, is, frankly, delusional.
UKUncut had a peaceful protest on Saturday. In fact all of their protests across the UK have been peaceful. You would have to quite stupid to think that the coincidence of violent protest during a peaceful protest turns UKUncut into a toxic brand.
It was called march for the alternative but it seems that UK uncut were the only group who had an alternative i.e
* Seriously attempt to close all tax loop holes and make corporations and wealthy individuals pay tax.
*Miliband's alternative was the same cuts only less and slower.
It's not the numbers on the streets that matters, it's the numbers in the polling stations, and as for the appalling violence on the streets, there is often a fine line between political passion and criminality. It's alright demanding a plan B from the coalition, but where's Labour's plan A?
It is becoming evident that Cameron deliberately allowed the anarchist elements to disrupt Saturday's march. He would have us believe that the security services did not know or were unable to single out the black bloc members before they reeked havoc - rubbish. Or are our security services really that incompetent?
He was primed to issue Monday statements decrying the violence and in so doing, discredit the achievement of 500,000 protesters. If we can't see that we deserve a full term of this feckless government.
I understand the level of feeling from UK uncut because, while big business and banks are getting tax cuts, the ordinary people of this country are being blamed.
Uk uncut specifically target greedy banks and tax avoiders, it wasn't just mindless violence, it was direct action.
I think what uncut did, was to keep the anti-cuts message on the news agenda all day, otherwise the news would have got bored with a peaceful rally, even though it was 1/2 million strong and I suppose they made the 'evil public sector workers' look pretty nice in comparison, which will not have pleased Cameron.
When UK UNCUT were targeting local tax evaders in Brighton the reaction from the public seemed to be one of general gratitude. There is huge public sympathy for their actions, the corporate media however will eagerly undermine this in any way they can, including sensationalising the actions of a few mindless undercover police officers. Anyway, who is going to lose any sleep if Santander gets a kicking? Really?
It’s not about whether they were violent – they shut down the running of a good wealth-generating enterprise for several hours. An enterprise which employs young people and which pays tax in order to keep public services running. An enterprise which contributes to massive philanthropy supporting young people and which has specifically reserved funds to support services affected by reductions in public sector expenditure. All this on the spurious grounds that a company they are part owned by also owns another company which may or may not evade its full fiscal responsibilities. Mind-bogglingly pathetic.
It was stupid, selfish, sanctimonious and the last thing this country needs - and it doesn’t deserve support.
UKuncut seem to be aiming at the wrong target - they should be demonstrating outside labour HQ, as these cuts are labours cuts - they are only necessary because of labour - and labour would have had to implement them too much the same degree
UKuncut do not have any significant support other than public sector unionists, such as those on the riot - there would not have been many private sector employees there, except BA cabin staff who are always on strike anyway.
I think between millies appalling speech comparing himself with mandela and the rioters with the suffragets and civil rights movement and his paymasters, the fat cat trade union bosses, inciting riot, the public will realise very clearly how bereft of ideas and backbone the labour movement is.
If there were 500,000 at the march ( and I did not see anywhere near that on the overhead pictures shown, more like 100,000) then it just shows how overmanned the public sector as most of the rioters were public sector or retired public sector or of course professional students.
I think UK Uncut were wrong to choose F&M as their target, rather than, say, the primark on Oxford St owned by the same people, partially because it all looks a bit "class war" but mainly because f&m was on the route of the march, whereas i thought the UKU plan was to be a bit more separate... when you've got the anarcho-kiddies going daft along pall mall anyway, surely they'd have been better off away from all that?
Also, just out of interest, where does UKU get the money to print 30-40k full colour, strangely cut flyers like they had on saturday?
I'm not against their aims at all, but think they made a bit of a mis-step on saturday...
The Tory trolls are commenting aplenty on all the news sites. Well done anti- cuts protesters for 26th, more power to you (us).
UK Uncut are brilliant.
I hope the members of the so-called "Black Bloc" end up getting pins stuck in their feet at Gitmo while the undercover coppers who thought the whole thing up are exposed and have to live in hiding for the rest of their miserable lives.
"Violence" against property isn't violence - it's restitution.
"Trespass" onto buildings owned only as a result of tax dodging and exploitation of workers, isn't trespass - it's reclaiming!
This "Coalition government" isn't legal, constitutional or elected (nobody voted for it after all, and the Progressive Left had a majority of votes and indeed of seats) - so it's not democratic, it's oligarchic.
Obeying its dictats isn't obedience to lawful authority, it's being cowed by our own oppressors.
"A peaceful march" isn't the way forward when our voices aren't heard and the rape of country continues. Direct Action is the only route forward, and if that is repressed (as the government tried to do on Saturday) then the only remaining path is Revolution. But since the last change of government was so undemocratic, the restitution of true democracy may have to happen by non-electoral means.
The more you read about the chaos you can see that it was set up by the right wing,took all the attention away from the good people who marched for a reason,the roits played right into Tory hands.
I was made redundant last year from the private sector (Construction). Get a grip of yourselves a pay freeze!? a 5% percent reduction, you'll just have to do without your moist toilet paper for a while!
Mark, the fact you were made redundant doesn't justify making hundreds of thousands of public sector workers redundant too. In fact jobs in construction can only be created, if public sector spending is boosted - not cut, as this foolish government is planning to do!
Please don't buy into the ConDem narrative that "the pain has to be shared out" to the public sector just like it has to the private. In a race to the bottom, we all lose - only the rich will win. Public and private sector workers need to stand in solidarity together, and protest against cuts, wage freezes, and redundancies across the economy.
until you realise in a competitive world that YOUR jobs and YOUR income and YOUR public services have to be paid for by PRIVATE companies which need to be attracted to YOUR country then you have either learnt nothing from history or are ostriches. Amd why do all people who call for tax increases, only do so until it is them paying more.
i disapprove of many of your comments on here, does that give me the right to come and sit, peacefully, in your houses and stop you and your families going about your business? Let's have debate, by all means march peacefully in public places, and you will advance your course with the wider public. Hearts and minds wins!
Paddy, your argument makes no sense whatsoever. I might as well write (in fact I'm jolly well going to):
"Until you realise that in a competitive world YOUR jobs and YOUR income and YOUR private companies, have to be provided with vital services and infrastructure - an educated and healthy workforce, justice system, transport, a social security system so that consumers can afford to buy your goods rather than starve to death - that has to come from PUBLIC spending".
Which is why the cuts are a lunacy. Why will companies locate jobs and investment here, if we have a second rate education system, failing transport infrastructure, rock-bottom consumer confidence, and so on?
Truth is private and public sectors are highly interdependent (and many tasks done in the private sector could, and should, be in the public sphere e.g. railways and utilities).
Trying to divide private versus public sector, setting them at loggerheads against each other, is PRECISELY what this unelected, unconstitutional government wants us to do - fight each other while they butcher both of us. It's time to stand together and stand up for ourselves, against the "grasping classes" above us. I'm so proud of UK Uncut for doing that.
So a few windows got broken, diddums! What about the damage done to human beings caused by the bankers and their selfish greed? the politicians better get used to damage, they cannot ignore the ordinary working and voting people of this country and expect us to just lay down and take it. they need to do something now before you have a full blown revolution on their hands.
Ducky - I'm pleased you called me a young man - the crash is entirely due to the state over extending itself as it always does under labour and the labour chancellor, (I think his name was brown but I may need education here, it could be balloon)cosying up to the financial sector because he liked their tax money. Yes the general public were greedy and over borrowed and the banks encouraged that, as did balloon, but the economy was destroyed by the rise in government debt such that when the credit crunch happened the country was not fit enough to carry it through and the debt became unmanageable. I call that bad fiscal management, by labour, under ex chancellor balloon.
I don't understand what all the confusion is about people's political stance is usually (but not universally) based on their own socio-economic group. People with an 'interest' in the public purse don't want cuts....people with an 'interest' in private finance want low taxes......have I missed something? One thing is certain.....we live in a world free market economy. Whether you like it or not if we keep spending and not trying to tackle the national debt and our large trade deficit we will be in trouble. Shouting, sitting and smashing things up aren't going to change this
UK Uncut mean well and I sympathise with their aims but they were a distraction on Saturday. 250,000 people marching against the cuts was dumped as a story by the media in favour of covering UK uncut's stunts and the thugs looking for a punch up with the police.
A great day reduced to very little by people who are well meaning but politically naive.
@Paddy: Workers' cooperatives. Look 'em up.
I felt that the F&M occupation was a tactical error but also believe that UK Uncut are an intelligent and learning organisation and are likely to get back on track and not repeat this. I fully support them.
@ Sam
Your facile rhetoric ('lynched if at all possible.') is way, way off and clearly untrue too. What's more you know it.
Well done UK Uncut.The morality of your actions cannot be questioned.It's good to know there is still a thread of common decency in a land that allows the likes of Philip Green pay himself £1.2bn, the biggest paycheck in British corporate history, without paying a penny in tax while tax paying pensioners die of hypothermia.
Nine pensioners died from cold EVERY HOUR last winter as bill prices soar
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1332343/Nine-pensioners-died-col...
Mods, where's my comment?
Good point but perhaps the billions and billions of people should be protesting at the doorstep of a small country with only modest natural resources but whose average income is £25,000, more than most of the worlds population could hope to earn in a lifetime. Not justifying Philip Green's obscene pay packet but just offering a little perspective on economic fairness from a global point of veiw
The billions that live of less than $2 a day that is
The UKUncut alternative is based on a mythical pot of money that companies are hiding from the HMRC. However, they _never_ substantiate any of their accusations with evidence. I asked on various forums (fora?) on how UKUncut came up with the £40m tax avoidance accusation against ABF but no one seems to be quite sure.
This reluctance/inability to substantiate their claims serious undermines the creditability of their alternative
Looks like Mehdi Hasan didn't get the memo - oops.
Eddy S - you're too reasonable for the New Statesman and the left in general. They prefer simple platitudes that turn everything into "us and them", with them being evil bastards who should be lynched if at all possible.
I do support ukuncut and am grateful to them for doing that bit more than those of us on the a-b march. The a-b march was quite enough for me, it was positive and I think there is still a place for a good family friendly protest march, but we do need Uncut protests, we need all different kinds of protest.We need to support those that protest as well, dont do the Tories job for them by not doing that.
Mr. Trilling, you assume the violence and damage would have happened anyway; this is a fairly cynical assumption. In the end it was workers who were left to pick the mess left behind. Stop the apologetics; wanton violence is wanton violence and it gives anarchism a bad name.
Sorry, but UK Uncut are rather clueless and just attempt to brain wash people into breaking the law.
Maybe if many of the supporters and fans looked up a few things about them they may not be so willing to pat each other on the back and tell everyone what a great job they are doing.
I hate to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but the facts are: Peaceful protesters were lied to and arrested, people who damaged property were allowed to do it in front of the police, all pages I've looked at like UK uncut and Armchair Army have been attacked by trolls.
tax avoidance is a form of natural human behaviour.
anyone who opens an ISA or fills up the tank before budget day etc makes a choice to avoid taxes.
it is tax evasion that is illegal.
part of the problem is an over-complex tax and benefit system with many types of credit and expense exemptions etc.
if we had a plain old simple tax system on a single page of A4 rather than an encylopedia where income tax was the same as VAT was the same as corporation tax was the same as capital gains tax (you get my drift) then only the accountants would be poorer - the tax system would be easy to administer, remove incentives to avoid and most importantly REWARD HARD WORK and enterprise (boy i sound guilty for saying that).
Gosh, I wish I would have had that ifnormatoin earlier!
Bully for Democracy! Well, for a superior sort of democracy - constitutional monarchy. O K, so a few policemen's helmets were knocked off - very Woodhousian: bit of a lark don't you think? Just like 'rag' week'! Maybe a few fireworks went off -but definitely no firearms were discharged. Not like those foreign johnnies. We may have to knock a few heads together.
Some commentators have rather unfairly compared this demonstration to something the Bullers' chappies might have got up to. Of course, Pater would have paid for the property damage and from time to time the lower orders do need chastising. Got to know who's in charge, eh?. Harmless fun! You may have noticed the similarity between the words democracy and demonstration. Those damned Greeks had a word for everything.
Nevertheless, although this time some of the great unwashed got a little out-of- hand, the demo was nothing more than a safety valve. Letting off steam, so-to-say. And Police chappies must keep their hand in. Problem is Home Secretary really is secretarial material!
Bertie
Great fun this for small state supporters with UK uncut an open goal - even some more rational lefties accept that public sector cuts are required no matter who is in government, and then you get the rioting supporters who dont want anything but to destroy - their logic matches MilliE's ideas, none!.
Totally approve of uk uncuts creative protests
smoke screen expected and duly delivered