The demonisation of the white working class
“Chav bashing” has become an acceptable replacement for overt racism and fuelled the rise of the EDL
By Lisa Ansell Published 06 February 2011 11:52
This weekend has seen David Cameron play on racial tensions, declaring multiculturalism to be over. The latest EDL demonstration became a catalyst for discussion about how to prevent the far right from exploiting the upcoming economic instability. Those gearing up for the fight against spending cuts are agonising over how "their" movement can generate wider appeal, while the Labour Party continues to hand-wring about how to recapture support from "working-class" voters. In all these discussions, there is one word that is notable by its absence, a word that has permeated our culture and become the insult that no one wants applied to them.
Chav. A Hogarthian caricature with easily identifiable dress and language which epitomises everything that is wrong with "broken Britain".
It is the ultimate insult in a society where inequality can now only be articulated with language and values a university education produces. Both "left" and "right" quantify success in terms of how far you have moved away from the community into which you were born, and how effectively you have blended traces of "chav" into middle-class, understated blandness. "Chavviness" is clear evidence of a lack of aspiration.
If you come from a community that could be described as "working class", the behaviour you exhibit, your clothing and speech, or the name of your child, if at all "chavvy", can be used to marginalise you. Homophobia and overt racism no longer acceptable, "chav" bashing and fear of Islam and immigration are their acceptable replacements at the dinner table.
Northern towns, once at the heart of our economy, had the industry that sustained them ripped away under Thatcher. The credit-based economy that successive governments have favoured since did not really benefit them. We've had the same economic policies for 30 years, with Labour offering public-sector jobs, and state support to hide low wages and increasingly scarce, low-paid, flexible, insecure employment..
There are districts of Rochdale where 84 per cent of the people need benefits. Radcliffe, proud home of paper manufacturing till the early Eighties, now has a town centre that the Radcliffe Wikipedia page describes as barely viable. In Todmorden, the past 15 years have seen the remaining industrial employers disappear one by one. Local market traders, with the visible examples of Rochdale and Burnley nearby, fear their town is dying because the largest local employer is now the high school. The view of new businesses started in each wave of immigration, distorted by the wilful scaremongering about Islam and immigration by our politicians and media.
It is towns like these where groups like the EDL will capitalise on genuine feelings of alienation. It is in these towns that the fight against the cuts will be most important, and it is towns like these where Labour will hand-wring about how to recapture the "working-class vote". If any of these problems is to be addressed, we are going to have to discuss how our economic policies have done so much damage, and why we have allowed the white working class to be abandoned and demonised so effectively.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















61 comments
Lisa - You wrote a long reply to my question ( and I thank you for that) but you didn't actually answer it.
What I would like to know is what you think of a woman being arrested and tried for quoting from the Koran on the grounds that this incites hatred. Are you for or against freedom of speech?
In my opinion, Geert Wilders is right when he says "More Islam, less freedom." What do you think more Islam means?
No, I wasn't drunk. Sorry if it appeared that way. I was merely commenting on your views about what the working class needed to do to fit with your ideas about what is appropriate for them and what is not. And the content of an answer that blames 'them' for attacking when they do not agree with you, and believes that those nice working class people should stand in solidarity with you in a way you think is suitable.
Your comments were not taken out of context, they are there in writing- it would be odd to do so.
And yes- the damage that Blair and Thatcher did will take generations to fix- however, I wonder at how people expect it to be fixed if those affected are either an idealised version of the working class who you just feel need to stand with you, or are those nasty ignorant ones who are blaming and attacking their neighbours.
THanks for reading though-and the tag team replies.
Lou and Danielle- are you honestly saying that because you heard a definition of 'chav' that was narrow and applies to the bullingdon club taht that is how narrow it's definition falls these days?
And this idea that the 'British Working Class' just need to embrace your version of solidarity and organise? And stop blaming and attacking others?
So if they just listened to you?
And because you have both decided that 'chav' means one thing-notably not applied to you- that it does- and is not apparently roundly used to denigrate? And that people just need to let go of the thoughts that they hold and agree with yours?
That what happened under Thatcher, and subsequently Blair and now continues and threatens to complete under the coation was just a 'loss of solidarity'? Which they can fix?
Etch Tee- you are right- it is complicated. Mainly because we are not talking about the idealised version who are supposed to stand with Danielle in Solidarity- or the nasty horrible version who are blaming and attacking their neighbours or are chavs.
The ideology people follow as to white working class men being conned we are not being conned you should look into what the EDL stand for it is against sharia law which if you look it up is a fucking disgusting and backward thing to follow also they are not saying islam is not welcome or every person that is not white is not right NO thats racist and the EDL are not racist they are saying there is a place for islam however it needs to be brought into the 21st century i.e homosexuality is allowed we accept its there right to be homosexual were as islam doesn't also woman shouldn't have to cover up they should be allowed a say in what goes on they should be able to learn and become succsefull were as islam treats women as second class citizens the EDL will continue to travel round the country and i for one am glad because if it wasn't for peoplpe like this the working class people who are the glue that keeps the country together you upper and middle class pricks would have to lift a finger and actually do something for a change !
"White" working class? Racist drivel, 'appen s'i'thi.
Firstly I do feel that many of the white british working class do feel isolated and put down but this is because their life, cultural and religious needs are not met. Putting groups like the irish and poles in the same category is wrong. Firstly they have a different heritage and culture and secondly they have their own community and cultural organisations where they can get help and look after their interests, things which the english, scottish and welsh communities don't have. The edl and bnp are filling this gap, providing voices for the voiceless, where their policies are right is another matter, but actually the edl are more anti islam than anything else. Islam by the way is a religion not a race.
Secondly unemployment and poverty affects all races and religions. Singling out the poor white population is unhelpful. Black and asian populations have high unemployment and poverty too. Infact the highest rates are the mentally and physically disabled. Getting ahead is a very middle class thing. My mother worked full time at 14 with no qualifications and had to be trained. But she was given opportunities. Later she hated how work had developed and how people became selfish. You can work hard and not be selfish. She worked in the 50's though when training/apprenticeships from scratch was normal by employers and employers took responsibity for training with government help. The idea everyone has to be in top jobs is utter nonsense. Menial and manual jobs always need doing and people should not be looked down upon by doing them. It was the work done by all these white and non white working classes that made britain into what it was a leading economic power. But no one should look down on these white working class people for the work they and their ancestors did. Employers should be making themselves visible working with schools, colleges and universities, offering training etc not expecting people to be ready trained and qualified. All work places need common sense something you cannot learn in a book. Most people i know are not go getters but actual just want decent long term jobs, respect, loyalty and a chance to learn and contribute, with decent wages. Strong communities, with strong ties leads to stronger societies. Selfish, individual, money driven societies where people look after themselves, lead to broken societies. The working classes are in one camp and the middle class is in the other. There are very different ideas of work, money and life out there which are at odds with each other and why so many feel alientated. In history the middle class wasn't always so selfish many of the great business generators wanted to help the less fortunate e.g. Cadbury. He gained a motivated, loyal and respectful workforce and the business grew. But there was also great leisure facilities. What people fail to realise is that manufacturing wasn't just work it was a way of thinking, self contained communities with strong senses of identity, pride, helping out etc. Businesses can grow without such selfish attitudes. As a country we don't make anything, therefore we cannot get out of debt, not bringing enough money from abroad. Personally i rather be doing a lower paid simple job, working hard and be happy than be in a top job and be unhappy and stressed, not seeing my children with no work life balance. I do have anxiety disorder so maybe i think differently anyway. We cannot all do top jobs there simply will never be enough of them!
The problem also lies in the way in which the working class are portrayed in fiction. Depictions of the working class in fiction are over represented by horror stories of dysfunctionality and criminality (Trainspotting, Shameless, This is England), or in supposed uplifting fairy tales of escape from working class life (Educating Rita, Billy Elliot). There are far fewer explorations of common human themes in the context of everyday working class life. All feed policy makers appetite for social mobility as a panacea to such social ills.
Horror Stories and Fairy Taless
Cheers Lisa - I like chavs, there is something quite refreshing and healthy about them, especially that one that was on celebrity big brother the other year, winding every fecker up. She was intersting, but can't for the life of me remember her name, lady something maybe, or princess something.
oh yes, nurhh!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3OQ_Xcv97E
Lady Sovereign.
Brilliant article Lisa.
This needed saying, and all the liberal-media-types - wallowing in political ideology, arguing over the latest Mail-driven moral scandal, advocating protest and action; are shit scared of the people they claim to represent.
The casual racism, the ignorant bigotry, the reality tv-loving, Jeremy-Kyle watching, terminally unemployed (and in many cases, unemployable) underclass. Or so they like to be portrayed. While we have uproar at Mexican jokes, Melanie Phillips mentalism and hand wringing by a party that fails to represent or help the situation - there is always a look-down-the-nose attitude the parts of the working class that need to be hidden and not acknowledged. I felt it at university.
As soon as I spoke, with the strong northern missing "h" and passion for football, bitter and gambling - I could see the fear in their eyes. I also loved chess, political history and classical music - but they never stayed around long enough to find out.
Moral and cultural superiority. They don't say it, but you know, deep down, that's how they feel. And while that exists, fears will continue to be played on, ignorance fuelled and bigotry accepted. But, at least, you've got the high horse to balance on.
Ethnicity, race, creed, sexuality, gender are all identity issues that are best left self-defined. Any other arrangement forces 'otherness'. So when the EDL call themselves White British Working Class, it may very well not sit comfortably in what those words mean for us, but it is how they perceive themsleves. The fact that they are using it as realistically to me as Cameron's concept of 'caring conservatives' is irrelevant.
Our education system lets people down, we demonise our children and we have a disgusting level of poverty for a wealthy country. The less privileged are made to turn on one another to fight for the last shreds of services, so people scapegoat each other.
I feel that this was the theme of what Ms Ansell was saying in the above article, not attempting to be EDL apologist or redefining 'Chav'. Nor is it rascist to refer to a group of white men as, well, White! Merely highlighting that further disassociative derogatory speech simply fuels their fire and mocks anyone who identifies as white/british/working class as a whole: political leanings aside.
It is incredibly frustrating to see those who have more privilege than we might potentially see oursleves having making themselves out to be worst off. The EDL certainly make me feel this way. However shouting this over the top of them does absolutely nothing. When the community is engaged directly at a local level (like i have seen here in West Yorkshire to amazing positive effect with Hope Not Hate) you end the indentity crisis for both community and individual and life gets more bearable.
Maybe we need to be invaded by aliens from another planet, then we can unite and be humanity. I'm fed up of apathy and crave empathy. Margaret Thatcher ruined the working class and destroyed socialism. It is the neoliberalism of this country that has given rise to multi-cultural divisions. We need to unite and fight the corporate sh*!te's that really control this country.
I was told this word 'Chav' is a common word to describe people from poor council estates wearing common cheap sportswear top-up with gold from a mr.argoz.
I feel just referring to this word 'Chav' is being unpleasant to the poor.
I was also told EDL is the same as the old 'National Front'. Getting vey drunk, meeting up in a group and bash a selected community.
This completely unacceptable! Somewhat Community bashing via Chav bashing!
Well said,it seems like it is okay to discriminate against a single group in society, the white working class. Alienation with the political system and the lip service that politicians have paid to genuine concerns over issues like immigration has led to a serious resentment and anger building up in these white communities, and with the upcoming fiscal austerity measures, it is almost as if a valve has been opened, and all the feelings that had built up over the last 15 or so years will be released all at once. That is what you saw at Luton, and what you will see in other towns and Cities that are facing the double whammy of job losses and the transformation of their local communities by the imposition of immigration in large numbers. This is not racism, this is just an observation. There is nothing wrong with immigrants at all, but when governments decide to impose so many immigrants of a different culture into a single town with solidly white working class values, you run the risk of problems.
"You are describing a non-working class.It isn't only white either. Many Afro Carribeans display, all the characterisitics of this rapidly growing group as well. Single parenthood, lack of education, lack of respect for society, terminal reliance on benefits and a strong
towards criminality.
Both major parties are responsible. The Tories for pulling the economic rug under the feet of traditional working class communities and Labour for bribing them with benefits and an entitlement culture.
Basically the UK has developed a ghetto culture of the kind established in the US long ago.An entire class of people who are a burden on society from the cradle to the grave."
There we go... APS, did you mean to comment on the Daily Mail website or did you copy and paste it from the latest 'Benefit Scroungers' article?
I'm diappointed that I wasn't appointed to Cameron's press office!
David Cameron is very brave to make a speech about radicalisation and multiculturalism on the international stage!!!
Very stateman like!...Made me very proud to be British and a Tory!!!
David Cameron is the greatest stateman in the world!
Oh, and I came from a single-parent family, went to the worst school in the area, and I have a distinct lack of respect for society. I claimed benefits for 18 months recently when I lost my vision - and dread to think - it could have been a terminal reliance if it wasn't for the brilliant - free when I needed it - safety net that you blame the major parties for creating and sustaining.
Sorry to be a burden.
Next time you head on and generalise whole groups with such succinct clarity and observation skills - remember me and my Afro Caribbean mates are coming to get you, and the Poles will rip you off with some shoddy workmanship. Be afraid.
Or realise that fucking labels mean nothing.
Cameron's speech was on the whole spot on, but the Tories' economic policies is just going to make things worse. Moreover, the Tories are notorious for sticking their noses up at the white working class, knowing that they're unlikely to win many votes. However, serious questions need to be asked of Labour, the party supposedly of the White working class for completely abandoning the core vote in favour of the immigrant population. I stress that I have nothing against Labour supporting immigrants, but they decided to fully support them against us, and that I thought was unfair. Whenever the white working class spoke out against this impartial treatment, we had some new Labour drone lambast us for being racists, even though we're anything but. When geniune white, Working Class people, proud of their roots and worried about they way their communities were being threatened by excessive immigration, made comments about how immigrants were being favoured in terms of receiving benefits, social housing, etc, we were told that we couldn't speak of these things. Well, now you've seen what happens when you brush issues under the carpet. They won't stay there for long, and will eventually come out, as they have now.
Rather than tar all the EDL with the same brush, it is time we understand what their supporters want. The EDL are composed of (on the whole) white, working class youths who have been betrayed by first the Labour government paying lip service to their worries, and now by this coalition that are cutting EMA and making it more expensive for these white youths to go to university. Moreover, with few job prospects and a lack of skills at their disposal, is it any wonder that they will fight back, and join groups like the EDL? Of course it's not.
Rather than tar all the EDL with the same brush, it is time we understand what their supporters want.
The EDL are racist thugs- funded by people who no concern with the towns I talk about. And the narrative they engage in ensures that anyone with a different skin colour and a successful business contributing where our economic policies have failed- is viewed as dangerous or a problem.
The alienation is real- there is nothing of value in the narrative that the EDL offer that feeds on it.
I will make this clear- cos I know that the content of my article could be distorted.
We need to tackle the alienation, the chav bashing and the economics- but there is NOTHING in what the EDL are saying to the people who live near me, that has value. Unfortunately they are using a narrative which has some basis on the reality of people's lives.
Oh come on SR819, for starters stop all this WHITE working class nonsense. The working class isn't confined to only white British people, it's made up of many races and yes they are British born too. This is the reason people cry racism at you.
Secondly, immigrants are not favoured OVER you or any other white british person in terms of benefits and if they are, then you head straight to your solicitors and fight it legally as that would be discrimination wouldn't it? The same with housing, there are legal requirements on housing criteria and it's rubbish to say that immigrants are prioritised above the 'white' British. If an 'immigrant'(and how do you know they are immigrants and not British born people) got a house quicker, then their need was greater and speaking as someone who has been on a housing list for eight years in need of a medical move, I feel damn qualified to say so. I came second last week for a bungalow, the person who got it was a Muslim - do I feel that he was given preferential treatment - yes - was it because of his race - no, it was because he is terminally ill and his need is greater.
People parrot the propaganda in the Mail and the Sun but don't scratch beneath the surface for the truth, the facts or the reality. Yes there are some problems that need addressing around immigration and as you said, particularly in larger areas where provisions weren't made locally in terms of schools and housing for such an influx but do not make sweeping statements and generalisations. Your experience is not mine.
Fucking Hell, internet debate gets bogged down in definitions.
"No my definition is right, no it's mine..."
In a nutshell, the whole problem. My interpretation isn't right. It's mine, and is based on such a complex series of events and experiences that I couldn't begin to explain it. But who the fuck am I to judge people who say
"Oh, those EDL leaflets make a lot of sense..."
I could look down at them, judge them for ignorance (clearly the EDL leaflets have no logical merits, or often, truth; as repeatedly repeated by Lisa and other above) But if that's what they think, that's what they think.
As Bolli Bolshevik says
"When the community is engaged directly at a local level (like i have seen here in West Yorkshire to amazing positive effect with Hope Not Hate) you end the identity crisis for both community and individual and life gets more bearable." and then, quite appropriately, followed by GuerillaGorgeous (two top quality usernames)
"Maybe we need to be invaded by aliens from another planet, then we can unite and be humanity. I'm fed up of apathy and crave empathy. Margaret Thatcher ruined the working class and destroyed socialism. It is the neoliberalism of this country that has given rise to multi-cultural divisions. We need to unite and fight the corporate sh*!te's that really control this country."
And one last point, I bloody love liberal types, and chavs, and media types, and the white working class, and the black working class, and the media liberal types. In fact, fuck the labels, they're irrelevant. I've got chav family (yes, I'm using a David Camreon debating technique, but I'm not lying) and friends, some of whom have voted for abhorrent parties - but, the more they see of them (EDL and BNP), the more they listen, the more leaflets they read, the more the lies become obvious.
Let people have their own views, accept them for who they are, and you'll be surprised.
But if you give people the choice between fear and hope. Some people choose fear. I just hoping those aliens invade so we can all "unite".
"Empathy, not apathy." To paraphrase an attractive large monkey or war tactic.
Labour supporting immigrants, but they decided to fully support them against us
And there was never a 'them against us' in any government policy I have ever seen, not by Labour-and not preferring 'them' to 'us'. In fact, in towns like Rochdale it has been the businesses that have resulted from immigration that have partly slowed the economic decline of towns. It's just that the 'them and us' mentality means that people can't see it. Do not mistake my views on how the people in towns around me feel- with agreement of something that is demonstrably illogical and false.
Although I think is important to understand how easily one issue feeds off the other.
@ Lou
Well said mate.
@ Lisa Ansell.
Racism is about race not skin colour.
Anyd= race is a complex thing to define. Race, Colour, Nationality (including citizenship), or Ethnic or National Origin are the bare bones of a definition- but culture, religion and a million other factors can be part of it.
And skin colour is visible enough that in casual conversation you find people dismissing british people as part of the 'problem' of immigration- not because of reasons any more complex than visibility and difference in skin colour.
THanks for reading though.
Lisa
I disagree whilst accepting your point about skin colour being the prejudice. Skin colour is not always a visible presentation of race . Many dual heritage people and people from the Asian regions look as white as an anglo saxon Brit. They still suffer racism though and it's not about how they appear to others - i.e. they look white - it's because of who they are and the fact that they are not white British by the definitions of the abuser.
I didn't say skin colour was ALWAYS a visible presentation of race, and I can think of a zillion examples of where it isn't- but skin colour is visible and it is pounced upon.
You see a factory open in Rochdale and it is owned by someone with white skin(or even name that is seen as 'english'), it is seen as contributing to the town.
The same factory when the owner is visibly not white becomes an easily identifiable way of deciding that it's appearance is part of a problem, not a very real part of the economic solution.
Lisa.
And I didn't say that was ALL that you were saying, it was a point you made and I responded to. I totally agree with your last comment.
Lisa ansell has caught the verbless sentence bug. Pain in the arse to read.
I think 'chav' is partly a product of divisions brought about by managerialism and an overly academic education system, such that you have middle class educated managers in charge of groups of working class people who have been stomped all over by an education system almost designed to demean them and render them incompetent. I suspect that the 'chav' myth has found its most fertile ground within this divide. The media largely eggs it on.
Right - let's have a wee go at replacing the words 'working class' with the words 'filthy rich' and then the word 'chavvy' with 'posh' in this sentence of Lisa Ansell's and see if the logical construction still holds up - "If you come from a community that could be described as 'working class', the behaviour you exhibit, your clothing and speech, or the name of your child, if at all 'chavvy' can be used to marginalise you."
Yup, thought so...
Lisa - Just a reminder that you still haven't answered my earlier question and to ask what you think of the Geert Wilders' trial which has just restarted.
Wilders has stated that he will set up a British branch of his party in the near future. If this party (and the EDL already support him)does materialise then I predict it will hoover up votes from Labour, the Tories, UKIP etc and replace the BNP. I can't wait. How about you?
I'm afraid that the poor white working class have only themselves to blame they need to get the skills through education and training in order to compete for the more better jobs; its a tough old world out there and nobody owes them a living anymore.
Is the usual editor of the Staggers on holiday? I am surprised that this badly-written polemic made it through quality control.
I am intrigued as to how Mrs Ansell feels able to make such sweeping generalisations as to "normal" dinner table conversations and what data sample she has used to qualify such assertions. Which dinner tables, obviously not hers, so I am wondering to whom she is alluding? It's a bizarre and hysterical statement, filled with as much contempt for who she perceives as bourgeois/middle class as she perceives them to have for the working classes or to use her term "chav".
"Chav", whilst unacceptable is usually employed to describe a specific minority and tends to describe behaviour and attitudes as opposed to other characteristics. Indeed there is something of a celebrity "chav" culture, which renders the premise that it is used to define the working classes or unemployed, false.
How else may inequality be articulated if not with language? This particular statement makes no sense whatsoever and surely society should value a university education. I would also disagree with the notion that success is only valued in terms how far away from their roots people have moved. It seems that there is a conflation between pride that despite a difficult or disadvantaged background one may have achieved a measure of professional or career success but certainly this is not the same as wishing to deny one's roots or disassociate oneself from one's background or be ashamed of one's identity.
Where Labour is failing is that its social policy no longer represents the interests of its core voters, instead pursuing a metroliberal agenda. One only needs to look at the way Gordon Brown dismissed the concerns of Mrs Gillian Duffy, a lifelong labour voter, as being bigoted, when she quizzed him on the subject of immigration.
I think Mrs Ansell would have done well to take a leaf out of Sunny Hundal's book and actually gone to Luton to meet some of the protestors and get a feel for what their actual concerns were; not all of them were white or ostensibly "chav", in fact many were middle class according to his account?before glibly ascribing a demonisation of "chav" culture as being the root cause. This completely avoids the issues of the EDF and how best to tackle it.
I pride myself on being open-minded. By the wonders of the Internet you can easily read and hear what the EDL are saying without the scary experience of being in the same physical space as working-class males. Read and listen, be impressed by their broad racial composition and admire their determination to bring the political establishment to its senses by non-violent street protest, THEN make comments about them.
The EDL are far more complex than many people like to admit, and i say this as someone who has been on numerous protests to oppose them.
Their chief-funder, funds out-right fascist organisations, like the Jobbik party in Hungrary and Swedish Democrats.
He has spoken at length about his desire to tap into football firms to build a street-fighting army to come out against Muslims and after, other groups in society.
The EDL as it stands now is a mix of those that go for the violence, and those that go due to an ignorant fear of Islam.
It would appear to me that the latter get tired of being with the EDL after going on a demo or two with them. After all, any sort of "political" or "patriotic" message you want to get across dies when you are surrounded by pissed blokes chanting "allah is a peado."
For goodness sake, the tag team reply was purely coincidental - not a conspiracy.
My final say on this matter, you still are picking an argument with me that I am not making in the first place. Please re read my comments because I must be blind to what you are seeing in them. Your points addressed to me don't relate to any comments I have made.
Perhaps you should challenge the commenters who really are arguing the case with you and making the points you say I have made.
I don't need to go to Luton, Jasmine. I am faced with the EDL gathering support where I live.
I am my grandfather's grand-daughter and Rupert Murdoch would be the first Corporate mogul I would blame and I do it in memory of my grandad who was a printer and actually has a miners lamp because of the work he did in the miners strike (Billy Bragg has one too.)
Football was a working mans sports, it was cheap, people were able to identify with their community. It gave meaning and purpose to people's lives. My husband followed Chelsea all round the country, back in the day. Now he's lucky if he sees it on the t.v (I refuse to subscribe to sky.)
When Sky bought the rights to Premiere football, the game changed to the usual corporate bo#!ocks and now we see men in suites at games.
When I see the EDL they remind of those football fans who have been priced out of the game. Instead of a football collective they now have a national collective. And instead of battling against those who are truly responsible, they are praying on the weak and vulnerable.
I'd like to see them take on Murdoch, like my Grandad did when Fleet St moved to Wapping. Lets see who's big and tough then?
http://www.amerabbas.com/blogs.php Although this gentleman is in Luton was heavily involved with march this weekend. Perhaps you could take up when and how people should visit Luton with him?
I would also like to say that as a child, on Mayday, we would dance around the Maypole, Morris dance and someone would dress up as a donkey and frighten all the kids. What the donkey symbolised I'm not sure.
When I see Bruce Parry visit indigenous people, he's sometimes greeted with a native dance. Whatever happened to Englands?
More pieces like this and the New Statesman might become worth reading again.
mcquade -- noted. Will try not to next time. If there is a next time!lol
It´s not about white working class-its about people who think their Religion make them the Masterrace.
Look at India,Phillipines,Thailand,Egypt,Malaysia everwhere TERROR,WAR and KILLING of non muslims.
I see that the Austrian human-rights activist Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff attended the Luton EDL demo and gave an excellent speech.
She is currently being tried in Austria for telling the truth about Islam - a la Geert Wilders. Any thoughts on her trial, Lisa?
I have found myself asking the following questions:
Wasn't the 'White Working Class' the 'Great Ignored' during the General Election?
What happened to listening to the 'Great Ignored'?
I think the 'Great Ignored' voted for chance in 2010!!!
So is "chav" now synonymous with the whole of the white working-class? Nothing to do with the section of idiots who attempt to terrorize working class communities? Such ignorance and an insult to white working-class people who have been demonized, ridiculed, or taken for granted for far too long. I guess you had to spend a few years in university to come up with that one.
When will the the working class whites see they are being manipulated by the upper class elitists. wake up twits, its not about race, its about equality. and youre being used like a tool...again.
Nobody demonises the white working class. In fact the white working class no longer exists in the UK. It has morphed into a single entity along with the traditional middle class. Broadly speaking most Britons of immigrant stock fall into that large group as well. Law abiding people who pay tax and have aspirations for themselves and their families.
You are describing a non-working class.It isn't only white either. Many Afro Carribeans display, all the characterisitics of this rapidly growing group as well. Single parenthood, lack of education, lack of respect for society, terminal reliance on benefits and a strong
towards criminality.
Both major parties are responsible. The Tories for pulling the economic rug under the feet of traditional working class communities and Labour for bribing them with benefits and an entitlement culture.
Basically the UK has developed a ghetto culture of the kind established in the US long ago.An entire class of people who are a burden on society from the cradle to the grave.
Forget terms like middle class working class and race. Apart from a very small elite class there are only two groups in this society. The larger group consists of the productive class and the smaller, but rapidly growing one, is the non-productive and burdensome class.
Enraged Brit: I have no opinion on her personally, and not much interest in reading about her- although I find the idea that this one woman knows some fundamental truth about a faith that is manifested in different ways by billions across the globe dubious to say the least.
Am not sure Islam is even demonstrated in the same way amongst more than half a dozen of my friends- very much like any other faith. Christianity for instance- I have some friends adamant that christianity means anti-abortion/anti sex education whereas others believe it is about a personal belief that guides how they live. Religion is a funny one- am not religious myself tbh
I am afraid I can only comment on the support the EDL are garnering where I live, the language I hear, the same old rhetoric: explaining the very clear effects of 30 years of economic decline(and Jasmine-that would er..be Neoliberalism and social policy)as somehow being a problem with Islam and 'them' at the heart. Perpetuating ideas that somehow the council favour 'them'- stirring up more divisions in towns that are already incredibly polarised.
Like the BNP who went before, and the NF and any number of fascist movements speaking to the same alienation- I don't generally enter into debate about the merits when I can see the effect very clearly.
I do worry about the effect of some aspects of fight against EDL. In Bradford recently I found myself in the middle of a conversayion about whether or not the EDL would be quite as eager to march, if it wasnt for the busloads of anti-EDL protesters who inevitably showed up with them-ending up with towns closed off and confrontations which caused a great deal of difficulty for residents.
Although to be fair some of the people I was with were also v pro-challenging marches as they happened.(I prefer Bradford Council's approach of trying to limit the effect of marches, and liasing with all the communities vulnerable to the effect of marches- to Luton's- but free speech and the right to gather also raise issues).
I do think unless the groups who claim to represent the working class, stop romanticising us and start accepting us as we are found- and the chav bashing that is now acceptable is challenged- then the EDL are about to find they have very fertile ground to pick from. Which is a terrifying thought.
gullible - who is being gullible here? I think you have taken the spin in here. It is you that needs basic education here, it looks.
Rise the blinds in front of your eyes, and actually look at your country.
pic,
http://www.visit.carmarthenshire.gov.uk/index_images/hires-images/Llyn_y...
There is an old brythonic folk tale related to the lake in this picture, about using love too freely.