Why unemployment benefit is worth less than ever

The benefit has failed to keep pace with wages over the past 40 years.

In my column in this week's magazine, I look at how the value of unemployment benefit has fallen over the last 40 years. There wasn't space to include all of the data in the magazine, so I thought I'd share some more of it here.

As the table below shows, unemployment benefit rates (£5) represented 19.2 per cent of average weekly earnings (£26.10) in 1970. But the Tories chose to raise benefits in line solely with prices from 1980 onwards, with the result that the replacement rate (the percentage of an old wage that a new benefit replaces) fell to 16.6 per cent in 1985.


First Major, and then Blair, stuck with the policy change and benefit rates fell to 13.8 per cent in 1995 and to 12.2 per cent in 2000. Today, Jobseeker's Allowance (currently £65.45 a week for a single person aged 25 or over) is worth just 10.9 per cent of average weekly earnings (£600.90). Had JSA risen in line with earnings, as the graph below shows, it would now be worth around £120.


Ahead of the Budget on 23 March, I argue that the coalition should recognise that there is an economic as well as a moral case for raising benefits. Low earners spend a greater proportion of their disposable income than high earners and stimulate the economy as a result. Almost no one but the TUC has made this argument; it deserves a wider hearing. As unemployment continues to increase, pressure for a fair deal for the jobless will grow.

George Eaton is political editor of the New Statesman.

New Statesman
Show Hide image

Quiz: Can you identify fake news?

The furore around "fake" news shows no sign of abating. Can you spot what's real and what's not?

Hillary Clinton has spoken out today to warn about the fake news epidemic sweeping the world. Clinton went as far as to say that "lives are at risk" from fake news, the day after Pope Francis compared reading fake news to eating poop. (Side note: with real news like that, who needs the fake stuff?)

The sweeping distrust in fake news has caused some confusion, however, as many are unsure about how to actually tell the reals and the fakes apart. Short from seeing whether the logo will scratch off and asking the man from the market where he got it from, how can you really identify fake news? Take our test to see whether you have all the answers.



In all seriousness, many claim that identifying fake news is a simple matter of checking the source and disbelieving anything "too good to be true". Unfortunately, however, fake news outlets post real stories too, and real news outlets often slip up and publish the fakes. Use fact-checking websites like Snopes to really get to the bottom of a story, and always do a quick Google before you share anything. 

Amelia Tait is a technology and digital culture writer at the New Statesman.