The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Blow for Cameron as Liverpool pulls out of the “big society”

Liverpool council says the coalition’s cuts make the project unworkable.

After the coalition's "big society tsar" was embarrassingly forced to reduce his hours, here's some more bad news for David Cameron's pet project.

Liverpool City Council has pulled out of the initiative after it concluded that the coming cuts made its participation impossible. It is particularly embarrassing for Cameron because, Lenin-like, he selected Liverpool as one of the four "vanguard communities" that would be the "training grounds of this change".

The head of Liverpool council, Joe Anderson, has written a letter explaining the decision to Cameron and it's worth quoting from at length. First, he says the government "has failed to deliver a single change that we have requested".

Liverpool has been doing the "Big Society" for many years. We call it "working with our communities" and it is something we are very much committed to. We pride ourselves on our excellent working relationships with our community and voluntary sectors, and indeed have done our upmost to support these sectors – as they are crucial to the success of our city.

He then warns that the loss of £100m of area-based grants and a huge £141m reduction in council spending has put many voluntary and community groups at risk.

[T]heir ability to help us improve the quality of life for Liverpool residents has been seriously undermined by two government decisions. Firstly, the loss of over £100m of Area Based Grants to Liverpool has put many organisations' very survival at risk. These funds, aimed at tackling deprivation, were widely utilised by the voluntary sector. Secondly, Liverpool's extremely poor local government settlement means a huge £141m reduction in council spending over the next two years. This level of cuts will significantly impact on council services, including the funding of many of our voluntary and community groups.

How can the City Council support the Big Society and its aim to help communities do more for themselves when we will have to cut the lifeline to hundreds of these vital and worthwhile groups?

He concludes: "Liverpool City Council can no longer support the 'Big Society' initiative, as a direct consequence of your funding decisions."

A

An equally powerful critique of the coalition's approach comes from the television producer Phil Redmond (of Brookside and Hollyoaks fame). He told the Local Government Chronicle: "I went along with it all because I thought it would be a good way of getting things going, but it's been impossible to get any traction because of the cuts – everyone is dealing with post-Spending Review trauma."

Redmond had planned to lead a project to boost volunteering across Liverpool but was forced to put this on hold while National Museums Liverpool, which he chairs, deals with budget cuts of 15 per cent. He laments that "the big society has become subsumed by the cuts".

A similar complaint has been made by "Red Tory" Philip Blond, who warned that the "drive for cuts and deficit reduction" was "running too fast" for the big society to flourish.

What makes these criticisms so wounding for Cameron is that they come from figures committed to the principles of the "big society". Tory backbenchers who dismiss it as "BS" can safely be ignored, but figures such as Redmond and Blond cannot.

34 comments

robjam's picture

Align this story with the downscaling of the commitment of the BS tsar, so that he could get a life.

Then triangulate with Tim Montgomerie's piece about unrest amongst Tory backwoodsmen.

And finally sniff out the briefing against the chair of the Charities Commission over last weekend.

You see what's happening here?

Des Demona's picture

I've just drawn Cameron's face on my thumb. The likeness is uncanny!!
But that is bye the bye - in London a judge ruled some of the proposed cuts as a breach of human rights. And that is exactly what they are. Dissapointingly not a story the NS seems to have covered.

Martybee's picture

I am all in favour of the big society, it works remakably well here in TRUMPTON.....

Nick's picture

As someone who works - as paid staff - in the voluntary sector (CAB) I can tell you that the collapse of funding is a tragedy. Cameron and his cronies talk of a 'Big Society' and proffered this false hope it would fuel the voluntary sector, people swallowed it hook line and sinker, thinking it would create community projects thriving on voluntary participation. The collapse of Financial Inclusion Funding, Local Government and Legal Aid resources couldn't have come at a worse time, a time of need for proper advice resources to those facing redundancy as a direct result of the wilful destruction policy of this shameful government - not to mention people who are genuinely disabled and ill.

Liverpool has - quite correctly - put two fingers up to Cameron - but the arrogant sod won't take any notice.

This man, his sidekick Clegg and the awful Osborne are criminal in their actions, they aren't even promoting growth - which defeats any hope of recovery or paying back an over rated deficit problem.

It's people who suffer at the hands of this lot, - this government doesn't give one iota.

The Big Society was always a con - I said so ages ago. It's just a means of hiding vast numbers of people who will become unemployed - as they won't show up as a 'public sector' cut - we're a concealed figure.

The Big Society was always about Big 'Society' millionaires like A4E boss Emma Harrison creaming off public sector contracts - she now moves into the world of advice - ambulance chasing I believe they call it. A4E had an abysmal performance in their farcical welfare to work projects - costing people £760 million to get a pathetic 125,000 back to work.

And now she's out there - hiding under different names - recruiting for a stitched up advice agency which will offer its clients a pathetic telephone service - staffed by numbskulls who know nothing of the advice they'll be giving - they'll be guided by computers and ticking boxes to say - 'problem satisfactorily resolved'.

Needless to say Harrison is one of Cameron's 'Big Society' champions - and of course she has a very nice mansion - the proceeds of conning this country out of millions in public contracts.

Big Society = Absolute Joke.

jie4v7i14's picture

Extranea - do you remember John Major's "Back to Basics" nonsense campaign, that lasted for a couple of months? Load of nonsense shite that was too, as spoofed by Viz comic, by their cartoon tory politician character, Baxter Basics.
http://www.tate.org.uk/images/cms/21793w_comic_04.jpg

Ivan Miletitch's picture

The Big Society is another way of cutting public services & funding... this idea that, if you want something done, your local charity will do it better than the state pernicious a, not only can it probably not achieve that, but Cameron is also cutting funding to charities! No, the vast majority of the 'crisis busting' measures will be payed by the low & middle income classes & this is just the way the Conservatives want it & have always done it!

Ivan Miletitch's picture

The Big Society is another way of cutting public services & funding... this idea that, if you want something done, your local charity will do it better than the state is pernicious as, not only can it probably not achieve that, but Cameron is also cutting funding to charities! No, the vast majority of the 'crisis busting' measures will be payed by the low & middle income classes & this is just the way the Conservatives want it & have always done it!

Reginald-Fah-fah's picture

Folks!... It's not the last you have heard of the The Big Society in liverpool! Bloody marvellous!

I like Liverpool as it has been a City of Culture! Fantastic!

As I keep saying the Prime Minister David Cameron is a upright top chap! Who is going to get Great Britain Back on it's feet!!!

I'm totally believe in David Cameron!!!

jie4v7i14's picture

Jeezus Reginald F-F, whatever you say, s'pose.

Give me stength!

Reginald-Fah-fah's picture

Thank for the support!

jie4v7i14's picture

Whateva!

Robert Taggart's picture

@ang. @Reggie ? !

JG's picture

well said Ivan.'.. the vast majority of the 'crisis busting' measures will be payed by the low & middle income classes & this is just the way the Conservatives want it & have always done it!'
Anyone (and this specifically includes you Simon Hughes and all other 'left-leaning' lib dems!)who thought this coalition government would be about 'concensus' is a naive idiot. My Big Society volunteering task is to do whatever I can to get rid of this lot as soon as possible.

Nick's picture

This is where Council's vent their fury over the localism bill. It's all very well giving Council's the 'power' to make decisions at local level - but what good is this - if the cuts only force them into making decisions which decrease the availability of services? The 'localism bill' should be renamed the 'coward's bill' - passing the buck & blame onto local Councils - shifting the blame to local Councils - no wonder they are all telling Cameron what he can do with the 'Big Society'. Bristol council has joined the discontent.

Reginald-Fah-fah's picture

My good friend Nick...it's great to here from you!!! The bedtime story idea and cleggsy bear is totally hilarious! Better than any story I could have came up with!

I think the only person who could have talked David Cameron into forgotting the Big Society was Andy Coulson, but now the Big Society is here to stay! What a lost to Great Britain!

But, I think there is room in the 'Big Society idea' to be developed by us! Big Society has never been explained in full and no one knows where it begins and ends. This includes David Cameron and the Top Tories.

If I remember right, I do think someone (who walks around Downing Street in his socks) has taken 'early 1980's society idea' and developed it and renamed it the Big Society! It didn't work in the 1980s, but it was a good blueprint for political success!

My big society rosette is hanging in my dressroom, my manservant will pin it on my sunday best, before I get totally of my face and hunt a few foxes! Can't wait for the law to changed, hunt foxes with hounds agains! Bloody marvellous!

Nick's picture

Reginald ol chap, hate to break it to you old boy - but the only one wearing the big society rosette in support of the floundering fool Cameron will be you old chap, now I'm sure it'll go very well with that tweed jacket of yours, but when it comes to giving a round of applause - won't it be a bit dull, the fanfare of just the one solitary clap in that deserted assembly hall? - bit like the applause the deluded man got at his conference, remember how flat that was Reggie? Surely you don't want to see your man Cameron embarrassed any further. The best thing for all of us is if Samantha, whilst reading him his bed time story, could just tell him......now shut your eyes Davey and when you wake up in the morning, promise me you'll put your best blue tie on and forget all about the Big Society, for me eh Davey? Now cuddle up to your favourite cleggsy bear and get some sleep, there's a good boy.

Surely someone can talk some sense into the man and get him to abandon this wretched idea?

Mel Davis's picture

Never bought the 'Big Society' crap anyway, and I am certainly not working for nothing. Well done, Liverpool for calling Cameron on his rubbish policies.

N Carew's picture

"We pride ourselves on our excellent working relationships with our community and voluntary sectors, and indeed have done our upmost to support these sectors". Or perhaps utmost? Seems Joe Anderson may have enlisted the help of the voluntary sector to write his letter.

Dominic Lynch Of Construction's picture

The Big Society is always in a 'state of flux'!

mcquade's picture

Who's to say it's not a NS subbing mistake? I see them every day.

jie4v7i14's picture

Big Society????

Pull Out????

I'm confused, for once.

What was "Big Society" in the first place, like churches, and chapels and mosques and football clubs and rigby clubs and quiz night teams in the local pub? If not, point me straight.

Cameron is a right arse, isn't he?

Luke Denne's picture

Finally! How does Cameron expect the voluntary sector to thrive without public funding? Money makes the world go round, the tories should be more aware of this than anyone. Well done Joe Anderson for speaking out.

Extranea's picture

It looks like the "Big Society", is dying before it ever began! Al;l rhetoric and no substance. You can't talk up the voluntary sector and then cut all the funding to it.

The last time this idea was mooted in Tory ranks was the "Active Citizen", by Douglas Hurd in 1990's. It died a death then and will do so again.
Another dishonest government initiative http://bit.ly/gzsZRF

Lou's picture

Well said Joe Anderson.

'We want to set free the voluntary sector and social enterprises to deal with the linked problems that blight so many of our communities, of drug abuse, family breakdown, poor public space, chaotic home environments, high crime. We can deal with these issues, we can mend our broken society'

Cameron's victory speech on getting the leadership 6/12/05 - the same one where he said 'there is such a thing as society, it's just not the same thing as the state'.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2005/dec/06/toryleadership2005.conser...

Robert Taggart's picture

@Nicky. 'cowards bill' = 'clever bill' !
Government cuts councils funding then leaves it to the councils to take the flack !
Seriously (!) though. There be too many councils and far too many councillors. Oneself has the benefit (?) of living in a unitary authority, but, too many other places - particularly the 'shires' - still suffer the nonsense of two tiers (district, county). Single tier councils should suffice. As regards the number of actual councillors - too many. Ones own council - Stockport - has 21 seats = 63 councillors (3 each seat). Methinks 30 seats hence 30 councillors to be quite enough. Turnout at all these council elections be poor - only a quarter to a third typically. Solution ? Fewer elections ! Once every five years, across the whole country would be our solution.
In short, a Big Society and a Small State !

ang's picture

Cameron has just had a bombshell dropped. 'Scousers are not thick and they care about people'.
You are not welcome up here Cameron.
Absolutely brilliant that Joe Anderson has shown him the red card! Hope the other 3 councils follow suit and show him where he can stick his underhanded scheme to destroy everything that ordinary people cherish.

Robert Taggart's picture

A blow ? NO !
Liverpool be a basket-case place. Lucky Cameo - he can cut all he likes in that place now - nothing to lose !

Nick's picture

Ah but Bobby, you're overlooking a few things. The state won't shrink in the way everyone thinks because of these cuts - it will shrink in terms of availability of services. But on the money side, oh no.

What will emerge is a load of private sector companies who will screw us even further by drawing vast fortunes for essentially delivering a grossly inefficient service where targets are all - but results are minimal.

There's a whole army of big society chiefs ready to capitalize and mop up- they'll all be round at Cameron's on another one of his champagne receptions. It's all a con - a mighty transparent one - those in the know can see what's happening a mile off.

Where it'll all go wrong for Cameron fool is growth - or should I say the total lack of it. Mark my words, this is what's on the cards.

Robert Taggart's picture

@Nicky. Ah, um, Mm !
Ofcourse those private sector shysters (Atos, Capita, Serco...) are already enjoying a feeding frenzy - too many useless 'work' programmes to mention !

ruth's picture

Cameron deliberately set out to humiliate Liverpool with his "Big Society" insult and then grind the heel of his boot in its face.
Joe Anderson, decent and enormously respected as he is, was prepared to try and make it work.
The tories demanded the impossible- Cameron and the naive(?)Phil Redmond have only themselves to blame.

ang's picture

@Reggie. I am going against my better judgement, to grace you with a response, but Cameron was going to cut as much as he likes anyhow and he has 'everything' to lose, like the next General Election.
When did you last visit Liverpool? Probably when you were reading the Sun and gained a sound knowledge of scousers!

Nick's picture

Reggie ol boy: Glad you liked the story, bet it's not too removed from reality though!

Ang: Yes old Dame Whatshername, not too chuffed with our David. Nor are Bristol City Council - who've written to Ken Clarke about pulling the plug on us hard working Legal Aid workers.

I can't help but think (hope) that the Localism Bill is another of Cameron's plans which will seriously backfire in his face. What seems strange that in determining cuts to Local Government, it's all a bit selective. Handy to cut off funding to those Councils whose electorate may be Labour or close run Liberals - thus making them unpopular. Of course it's the Council and the area MP who gets the blame for (a) imposing the cuts locally (b) doing nothing to oppose.

Is this another way of mopping up the Tory vote I ask myself - especially given how the Liberals are likely to fall off the cliff edge sooner rather than later.

That said; like someone said earlier - I never believed in the Big Society anyway. It's left those in the voluntary sector furious. Thankfully there are a lot of die-hard Tories in the sector - the more lost votes the better!

ang's picture

'Breaking new'!
Outgoing head of voluntary services, says 'Camerons cut are destroying the big society'. Why is it that most people understand, that if you take money away, it becomes worse. Cameron is such an empty-headed plonker! And him and his bessy mate are running the country, god help us.

ang's picture

'Breaking news' even!

Latest tweets