Politics 18 January 2011 Strasbourg rules on privacy and conditional fees A mixed day for the UK mainstream media. Sign up for our weekly email * Print HTML Today's European Court of Human Rights decision in the Naomi Campbell case is a mixed result for the mainstream media in the United Kingdom. On the one hand, the court has ruled by six judges to one that the development by the English courts of privacy law since the Human Rights Act 1998 is not an infringement of the right to free expression of the mainstream media. However, the court also unanimously ruled that the current conditional fee arrangements frequently used for privacy – and defamation – cases are a disproportionate violation of the right to free expression. The full judgment appears at Index on Censorship. A good summary of the case is at the Inforrm blog. David Allen Green is legal correspondent of the New Statesman. › Web Only: the best of the blogs David Allen Green is legal correspondent of the New Statesman and author of the Jack of Kent blog. His legal journalism has included popularising the Simon Singh libel case and discrediting the Julian Assange myths about his extradition case. His uncovering of the Nightjack email hack by the Times was described as "masterly analysis" by Lord Justice Leveson. David is also a solicitor and was successful in the "Twitterjoketrial" appeal at the High Court. (Nothing on this blog constitutes legal advice.) Subscribe from just £1 per issue More Related articles Is Labour really as doomed as it seems? The polls have got it wrong before Two referendums have revived the Tories and undone Labour If the cuts are necessary, where's Philip Hammond's deficit target gone?