Cancún: finally, some good news
The private sector has an important role to play in the wake of the climate summit.
By Barbara Stocking Published 13 December 2010 13:42
As the dust settles at the end of the UN climate talks, it feels as if we are entering a new phase in the fight against climate change.
The UN process has been resuscitated by the outcome of the Cancún summit. Before the curtain went up in Mexico, climate sceptics in the UK said they could hear the sound of the death rattle for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change process (UNFCCC).
With the agreement of a new and fair Climate Fund, however, we can now start feeling optimistic that we have turned a corner since the disappointment of Copenhagen last year. Rich countries did agree in Copenhagen to deliver $100bn per year by 2020, and next year crucial decisions on how to raise this money must be made. This will then be channelled through the new fund to help poor countries adapt to the impacts of climate change and develop in a low-carbon way.
Companies and investors have recognised for some time now, however, that the private sector has a critical role to play in complementing government action, by climate-proofing their activities and helping to make the global transition to a low-carbon economy. This was underlined at the Copenhagen summit, where both were pushing hard for the elusive global deal that they hoped would set out a clear framework under which businesses could operate.
Company directors are paid to have their eye on the bottom line and many see that strong political action across the world on climate change could spark business opportunities, while possibly creating more jobs and reducing unemployment.
It is in their interests – as well as our own – to recognise the business potential in climate-resilient, low-carbon growth. Europe's environmental sector already employs 3.4 million people and accounts for 2.2 per cent of GDP.
In the United States, a new Oxfam report estimates that two million Americans are employed in sectors, such as water management, agriculture, insurance and disaster preparedness, that help build resilience to the effects of climate change. If new openings are not seized on, Europe risks falling behind the likes of China and the US – both poised to profit from huge investment in low-carbon technologies.
In Cancún, several company directors unveiled practical schemes to underscore their green intentions. For example, the Paris-based Consumer Goods Forum, representing hundreds of manufacturing and retail firms, including Unilever and Tesco, announced that its members plan to use their collective resources to help achieve net zero deforestation by 2020.
This and other initiatives need closer scrutiny before we know what impact they will have on the ground, but it seems to me that this could be more than just greenwashing. I'm expecting there's far more to it than that. Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the UNFCCC, has recognised that closer partnership between the private and public sectors could offer a win-win situation.
I am heartened by this. We need every tool in the box if we are to help ordinary people cope with the damaging impacts of climate change in many of the countries where Oxfam works, including Bangladesh, Ethiopia and Mexico itself.
Of course, things are not going to change overnight. Many businesses, particularly in the carbon-intensive industries, are clinging to their old ways. They regularly lobby in Brussels to block the EU from making more ambitious cuts to its greenhouse-gas emissions, from 20 per cent to 30 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020.
While they raise concerns about the competitiveness of their industries under stronger European climate action, it would be good to see these companies lobbying to raise the bar in other national capitals, rather than blocking stronger action at home.
The risk of company greenwashing was highlighted by the recent announcement of the Worst Lobby Awards when, in online voting, the European public sent a clear message that they want to see a major clean-up of the Brussels lobbying scene. The German energy giant RWE and its subsidiary npower scooped first prize for claiming to be green while lobbying to keep coal- and oil-fired power plants open.
It's going to take time to change the practices of all corporates but at Cancún we started to sense that things are moving in the right direction. Companies must now seize the fresh momentum – no one can dispute that a serious commitment by global business to change its practices could have a huge impact on the future of the planet.
There is everything to play for.
Barbara Stocking is the chief executive at Oxfam GB.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















9 comments
Its important that environmentalist meet face to face every now and again to thrash out a better approach to climate responsibility. You can't do it by telephone links.
So air miles can't be avoided.
What is a disgrace is cheap flights on easyjet and ryanair to Spain.
The good news is that this plane load of carbon emitters had a free holiday in the sun whilst most of you were freezing.
@Tesco, announced its members plan to use their collective resources to help achieve net zero deforestation by 2020.
This is the problem when you allow middle class do gooders, like this old bag, to get involved in things they know nothing about!
@Tesco, announced its members plan to use their collective resources to help achieve net zero deforestation by 2020.
This is the problem when you allow middle class do gooders, like this old bag, to get involved in things they know nothing about! This is lke telling a child the tooth fairies will bring you a shiny new shilling.These people like Babbs are the problem not the solution.
You state that we will need every tool in the box, fine, but how much time was spent on POPULATION CONTROL?
To not address this, whilst there are an extra one and a half million humans to be fed every week, is complete irresponsibiliry!
Aren't we all forgetting the elephant is the room? Exploding global population... It's not direct action that will save this planet it's a condom and the pill.
SWATANDEA----So it's OK, for the rich and their legions of secretaries to enjoy the local beach at our cost. But not OK for Mr and Mrs Jones to have a couple of weeks in the sun, for which they have saved their own money. How very egalitarian!
========= http://clothesmall.org =========
Best regards for you all,
Looking forward to your visiting.
========= http://clothesmall.org =========
The fatal flaw in this analysis is the statement "Of course, things are not going to change overnight" - yet they have to if we have any chance to save the Planet.
Thus leading climate scientist Professor Hans Joachim Schellnhuber CBE (Director of Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research [PIK], Germany) has estimated that for a 67% chance of avoiding a catastrophic 2 degree Centigrade temperature rise (the EU target; would you board a plane if it had a 33% chance of crashing?) the World has to cease CO2 emissions by 2050. “All man are created equal” means that all human beings must be allotted equal shares of CO2 pollution until 2050. This means that high per capita countries such as the US, Canada and Australia must reach zero CO2 emissions by 2020, intermediate per capita polluters like the UK must get to zero by about 2030, while very low per capita emitters (e.g. India and Burkina Faso) can increase their emissions until finally reaching zero emissions by 2050.
Cancun showed that it is not happening. Pablo Solón Romero, the stand-out Bolivia representative at the December 2010 Cancun Climate Conference was blunt in his assessment of the final “deal”: "We're talking about a [combined] reduction in emissions of 13-16%, and what this means is an increase of more than 4C. Responsibly, we cannot go along with this - this would mean we went along with a situation that my president [Evo Morales] has termed “ecocide and genocide”.”
That climate genocide referred to by Evo Morales and others has already commenced. Mostly First World-imposed climate change is already impacting on the 18 million people who die avoidably from deprivation each year in the less developed regions (excluding China).
Dr James Lovelock FRS (Gaia hypothesis) and Professor Kevin Anderson (Director, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Manchester, UK) have recently estimated that fewer than 1 billion people will survive this century due to unaddressed, man-made global warming. With the world population expected to reach 9.5 billion by 2050, these estimates translate to a climate genocide involving avoidable deaths of 10 billion people this century, this including 6 billion under-5 year old infants, 3 billion Muslims in a terminal Muslim Holocaust, 2 billion Indians, 1.3 billion non-Arab Africans, 0.5 billion Bengalis, 0.3 billion Pakistanis and 0.3 billion Bangladeshis (see Climate Genocide: https://sites.google.com/site/climategenocide/home ).