welcome come to our ( http://madejerseys.org/ )
website:
everybody!sorry bother your time a min,we are serious and professional
jersey supplier,we can offer NFL,NHL,MLB,NBA jerser,the NFL jersey 18usd each,
the NHL jersey 38USD each.MLB jersey 18usd each,
NAB jersey 18usd each.we have many jerseys of other players,
so please contact us for more information if you are interested in .
1) More pictures available on our website (http://madejerseys.org/ )
2) Many colors available .
3) Perfect quality, small order accepted .
4) 100% safe door to door delivery, within 5 - 7 days air express for small orders .
5) We have lots of jerseys in stock
6) Letters and number are sewn on b2cshop body, 100% embroidery
7) Size: .48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 60
8) Delivery by UPS, DHL, EMS door to door
9) Delivery in 5 - 7 days NFL,NBA,MLB all are 18usd!!!! The jerseys in stock may be updated everyday !
come on,join us! ( http://madejerseys.org/ )

basically nothing

Clegg should defect to the tory party, along with Alexander and Cable. They should have the courage of their current convictions.

In truth, they crossed the line with the original coalition agreement, which in truth never stood up to the widespread analysis that said it was a good deal for the Lib Dems.

The present situation makes a mockery of true Lib Dems and their supporters. It's time for the leadership of the party to make their minds up once and for all.

And I speak as someone who voted Lib Dem at the last election. Never again while Clegg, Alexander and Cable are in positions of seniority.

Its a good question. Clegg is basically a new European, which might be a good thing. He doesn't quite fit in anywhere in British politics. He sees Britain as a natural member of the European Community. And they do their politics differently in Europe.
So he would be most happy representing Britains interests in Europe as its High Representative.
Which means that the leadership of tnhe Lib Dems would be up for grabs.

i always thought of liberals operating in the middle of british politics what we're seeing now clearly isnt that its a right wing agenda nothing more.

I do wonder what the rank and file think of all this,if things stay as they are (and i see no reason for anything to change we could be all be rolling around in fivers or tenners come the next GE and the libdems wouldn't get an ounce of credit for it)they face a massacre who knows maybe even extinction as a political party.

Yet clegg and his cronies cuddle ever closer to the tories madness i tell you madness.

The removal of EMAs is in fact more serious and detrimental to getting and keeping young people in further education than the rise in universty fees saga. So I hope the Govt is forced to climb down and do a U Turn on EMAs.

Clegg looks dreadful. He's aged seven years in seven months. At this rate by 2015 he'll be a centinarian.

But probably no wiser.

Marcus, presumably then you prefer to let multi-national corporations and private equity funds continue taking your money and control of your life?

@Dark Heart of Toryland:

Your point is topical, but sadly lacks relevance.

I dont remember any multi-national, or equity fund legally forcing me to pay 64p out of every £1.00 I work every day of my life to earn.

My definition of freedom is a number and that number is 49p.

But still, that man Nick Clegg, ooow he's awful. A truly despicable man, just horrid. Terrible because he didnt want to play ball with a deeply unpopular man and tired political party.

Also Clegg is right in saying that liberalism and the big society are the same thing. Centralizing power and authority is hardly liberal.

There's nothing new about political opportunism - combined with ambition - it makes mincemeat of manifesto promises and professed principles. Clegg has shown himself to be a lightweight - something he does have in common with his leader and best friend - Cameron. If either were Labour politicians they would have been hounded out of office by now - by a hostile media. Therein lies the real difference.

@Neville, what's a true lib dem? From what I can see the party has always been a slightly uncomfortable coalition anyway, between people like Clegg or Alexander-who are, despite what Lusina might think, pretty true to the traditions of British liberalism-and the political descendants of the '81 Gang of Four: i.e., Social Democrats disaffected with a left wing labour party. But I guess that throws up it's own dilemmas-for Clegg, for Cameron, and for Milliband. I think the latter has the least room for maneouvre, though. Clegg will hold on to most of his party, as will Cameron, but Ed M can't reach out to social democrats within the Lib Dems and keep the left in his own party happy.

@Marcus & Sam, good posts. Lucid, and on the ball.

We should scrap political labels because they make no sense. People throw labels around.

Can anyone even define 'conservative' or 'labour'. And if someone associates with one of those labels does it mean that the definition of that labels taints their whole belief on every political point?

Labels help us generalise a person's views. I don't think of myself as liberal or conservative any more. I have opinions on political issues without the need of dumb labels.

We should scrap political parties and instead have a group of teachers and parents running the education system, a group of nurses and doctors running the NHS. People would vote on individual issues. The current political system is utter crap and is outdated.