7 in 10 voters back decision to unseat Phil Woolas
Poll suggests that Harman’s decision to suspend Woolas from Labour is in step with public opinion.
By Samira Shackle Published 10 November 2010 10:44
Voters overwhelmingly believe that the court decision to strip Phil Woolas of his seat in Oldham East and Saddleworth was the right thing to do.
A YouGov/Sun poll found that 71 per cent of all voters backed the decision of a specially convened electoral court to hold a by-election in the area and suspend Woolas from politics for three years. Just 7 per cent thought it was the wrong decision.
While support was slightly more muted among Labour voters, a substantial majority still endorse the decision – 65 per cent of Labour voters said it was the right thing to do, compared with 82 per cent for both Conservatives and Liberal Democrats.
The figures show that those MPs rebelling against Harriet Harman's decision to suspend Woolas from the Labour Party are vastly out of step with public opinion. The Labour deputy leader said at the weekend that it was "not part of Labour's politics for somebody to be telling lies to get themselves elected".
The BBC reported last night that one MP told Harman that she was "a disgrace", while the Labour MP Graham Stringer warned that she had gone "far too far", and that there were "big issues involved here in terms of the future of our democracy". Another Labour MP, Michael Connarty, said he had asked Harman to "examine her conscience".
This response beggars belief. Woolas was convicted of lying and exploiting racial tensions in order to defeat his Liberal Democrat opponent, Elwyn Watkins. Quite apart from the moral issue, it would be disastrous for Labour to be seen to be supporting a candidate convicted of such serious charges.
While some take issue with Harman's suspension of Woolas before he had a chance to appeal the verdict, it is worth noting that the decision to suspend Lutfur Rahman as Labour's candidate in the Tower Hamlets mayoral race was widely praised.
It's likely that much of the outrage stems from the fact that Woolas is popular in the PLP. Stringer stressed his contribution to the party over many years – as if that should exonerate him from such a serious charge, which raises serious questions over his suitability to represent a constituency with a population that is ethnically very mixed.
Public perception of the whole political class is still reeling from the expenses scandal. The charge of lying and stoking racial tension is not a light one – and these poll results show that the voters don't take it lightly. Out-of-touch posturing will do nothing to help matters.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















8 comments
Is it really true that Gordon Brown is one of those supporting Woolas? I really don`t get that ;Woolas is a far worse racist bigot than Gillian Duffy !
The only way Labour Mps can defend woolas is to defend racist language and libelling your opponents. They are insane to be letting this carry on. harriet is right for once!
Count us in on the court decision.
Public opinion is outraged at MPs, full stop. Especially after the overblown expenses saga.
Today further outrage as we learn of the Court's decision on 3 more who deliberately and knowingly manipulated the system. But what of the 100 others like them still sitting in the House, who should have been replaced by persons of a better character and integrity.
I don't think it's right for Harman to dump on Woolas from above if he hasn't had a chance to appeal.
Harman, like Woolas is doing, should keep her mouth shut until the higher courts have ruled.
It would be hugely embarrassing for her if the Court of Appeal reversed the election court's ruling - to show how the party leadership rewards its loyal and hardworking servants at the first sign of adversity.
The MPs defending Woolas really strike me as disgusting people - interesting that they include Brown and D. Miliband. Do they actually believe that he did nothing wrong?
New Tory and New Labour, you couldn't seperate them with a smelly fishknife!
Woolas and all Nu£abour spivs out, out, out.