The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Time for Ed Miliband to speak up on child benefit

Labour's new leader needs to start as he means to go on and highlight the flaws in Osborne's rationa

As today's frontpages demonstrate, George Osborne's announcement yesterday that the coalition will be withdrawing universal child benefit has provoked concern and controversy across the political spectrum.

For a newly-elected leader of the opposition, this was surely a great opportunity to get stuck into the counter-arguments and start as strongly as you mean to go on. Add to this the fact that Ed Miliband has long been an advocate of maintaining universal benefits as far as possible. In September 2009, when interviewed by the BBC in his role as Labour's manifesto co-ordinator, he emphasised the importance of a mix of universal and targeted welfare, saying:

"Lots of families need the support that child benefit provides, not just the poorest."

A year on, on The Andrew Marr Show a few weeks ago, he said he didn't support reopening the issue of universal benefits, saying that means testing has "real problems", going on to say:

"I'm all for speaking hard truths. I don't personally think undermining the universal welfare state is the right thing to do."

Why, then, has Ed been so conspicuously absent from the debate since Osborne's speech yesterday?

Yvette Cooper is the only Labour figure who has made it into the coverage today in her capacity as shadow work and pensions secretary, which incidentally can't be doing her profile as a potential shadow chancellor any home. Most of the major papers feature a version of the following quote from her:

"The Government's unfair attack on child benefit is now unravelling. The Chancellor only announced means testing this morning, and already the Children's Minister has admitted that the thresholds need to be looked at again. They have clearly been taken aback by the reaction of parents across the country."

It could well be, as Iain Martin has suggested, that Labour are choosing to stand back and let the Tories face the not inconsiderable opposition from their own party, the Institute for Fiscal Studies, and others, before weighing in with their own defence of universal benefits, and universal child benefit in particular.

But it is now over 24 hours since Osborne's announcement, and Ed's silence is starting to seem less strategic, and more hesitant. There are intelligent and substantive counter-arguments to be made to this cut, as Nicola Smith demonstrated yesterday on Left Foot Forward. This is a big opportunity for him to make a real statement about the kind of leader of the opposition he is going to be, and to set the tone for how Labour are going to respond to the spending review in a few weeks' time. During the summer's hustings, he spoke often about the hard work Labour need to do to get back in power -- now it's time to lead by example and start doing it.

19 comments

??'s picture

oh for gods' sake.
There is nothing wrong with taking child benefit away from those families who could do without it.
If this process starts with the middle classes and it takes a while for it to hit the Rich, so be it. I'm sure the Rich, who thought of it, are having great difficulties coping with how much closer that prospective shark attack on them is now anyway. This country never really had a 'universal' anything. It was always divided socially and class-wise, no matter if things like child benefit were paid across all levels. At least taking this small step towards making child benefit something which should, primarily, be there for the poor is within the realms of common sense, finally. Make the middle classes pay for their own offspring. They're hardly starving. If they'd only shut up and set a good example by not moaning about it then maybe one day we might even be able to persuade the Rich to give up their benefit payments, as well, eventually. I mean, in reality that's, of course a 'Pigs might fly' scenario still but hey.. blind hope has always been a supremely British virtue.

swatantra's picture

I'd agee with that. To each according to their need. Obviously some of the anomilies need to be ironed out, but they can, and will, with a bit more pressure from Labour.
But its about time we came clean and parked this particular issue. To each according to their need.

Sam's picture

I think this is a double bluff. They are hoping that Miliband refrains from standing up for the well off, giving them a green light to cut other univeral benefits for the well off.

GetLabourOut's picture

Paying Child Benefit to millionaire parents the same as minimum wage parents? Very progressive!

Next from the New Statesman - why we should ALL only pay 20% tax and council tax should be the same for pensioner bungalows as 20 bed mansions.

New Statesman - Old Politics

Nick's picture

Ed Miliband should speak up and make sure he speaks loudly. He should attack the Child Benefit change with vigour by pointing out that if it is aimed at the well off, it should be aimed at the household income rather than the high tax rate of an individual. Keeping quiet on this one is not good enough Ed, It's the perfect opportunity to force Cameron to do a U turn and show how they've miscalculated this one, it's no good having a silent leader. Ed to the tannoy now! We need a leader to be bold, not timid, this isn't good enough.

harry the don's picture

a bit of proof reading wouldn't have done any home...

CrISpY DuCk's picture

I disagree Caroline why step in when all that would be achieved is Osborne's new critics being forced back back into tribal positions.Ed is smart and is keeping his powder dry ready to blow Cameron's head off with a blunderbuss at PM's Q's

Mary Nash's picture

What is Ed Milliband waiting for. It is time he repeats Universal Child Benefits is not just for the poorest. Also point out that during last year's Conservative Conference, George Osbourne proclaimed keeping the universality of child benefits along with bus passes and winter fuel payments. It is sad our leaders do not keep their word.They should not make proclamations/promises , to be followed by excuses to break them.

chris's picture

Why does Ed need to wade into battle when he can allow Yvette Cooper do it for him; as an added bonus she raises her profile in readiness to become shadow chancellor.

swatantra's picture

Ed knows full well that universality of benefits is a dead duck. So he might as well let the Coalition take all the flack. After all they are the Govt and should be prepared to.
Labours job is to mitigate some of the excesses of this Govt and bring out the inconsistencies and see that they are addressed eg the single parent earing £44K and a couple both earning £44K. And the 'cuts now' policy instead of phased in cuts.

Dave C's picture

Journalists often demand that politicians should dance to their tune. Ed Miliband shouldn't just react to every statement: the current Shadow Cabinet can do that. In the meantime, EM has about 13 days between the election of the new Shadow Cabinet and the Spending Review. He has bigger fish to fry.

treborc's picture

No especially as he agrees with it with his New Generation Labour team, what ever that means. Cooper would have gone further and made the poorest pay so the richest could keep it.

swatantra's picture

Experience shows that once a benefit has been taken away, its rarely re- instated because people have adjusted to the situation. Ed and Labour cannot promise that it will be reintroduced in 2015 for higher earners. Closer examination will show that those affected will look at tax avoidance measures and perks to stay below a the £44K threshold in order to compensate.

Marcus's picture

I agree with swatantra's comment. Let them take the flack.

ang's picture

leave it for now Ed, they,re making a 'pigs arse' of it anyway. I sense 'the people' are wising up to the toffs. I just caught ken clarke at the conference, what a rediculous, upper-class fart he is, I could hardly understand a word because he's so posh! They are all upper-class twits and will hopefully put ordinary voters off.

adamblanerichards's picture

@swatantra nandanwar

Spot on.

You play in dirt, you get dirty.

thinkov's picture

I'm more inclined towards universality with a concurrent reduction of high wages to a maximum of £100,000 per annum

Trevor's picture

There is frankly very little that can be said unless the 'labour left us in debt' argument is countered.The Tories are no fools by putting their first major cut on higher earners. Ed needs to play a long game and we have a long time before the next election.

Trevor's picture

well he came out fighting now an excellent start I thought.

Latest tweets