Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Can women make it to the top of the Labour Party?

At a women’s hustings event, candidates set out how they’d address the gender imbalance at the top of politics.

Macho? The Labour Party? Absolutely, according to the leadership candidates at last night's women's hustings. When asked to name an example, Ed Miliband said he didn't know where to start, with all the Blairite-Brownite blustering, and Diane Abbott said she didn't have all night. Ed Balls was surprisingly humane, admitting that even the giant hammer for Labour himself had been at the receiving end of macho thinking when colleagues told him his stammer was a weakness to which he shouldn't admit.

After a complaint that Labour's campaign material was full of men, Balls admitted that it was Sarah Brown -- not a female cabinet member -- who was called to be in the main photo for it.

There was something rather satisfying at seeing the "young princes and top guns of New Labour" -- a description used by Diane Abbott to describe her fellow candidates -- being forced to seek approval from a room packed with several hundred women. The event had been organised by Lead4Women, a grass-roots organisation that has sprung up spontaneously around the leadership election, in co-operation with the Fabian Women's Network. It was also good to see the event supported by upcoming female bloggers such as Delilah and Claire Spencer.

With the event coming on the day that the Labour PLP debated gender representation in the shadow cabinet, the first question asked how the candidates had voted. Ed Miliband, David Miliband and Diane Abbott voted for 30 per cent of posts being reserved for women, rising to 50 per cent in 2012, but the party as a whole went for Andy Burnham's preference for keeping it at 31 per cent, a figure that only just matches the goal set by David Cameron.

You have to wonder how much lobbying the leaders did to push their 50 per cent preference -- perhaps a token vote in the right direction was just a little too convenient. Ed Miliband sounded strongest here, saying we have to rebut the idea that women's shortlists are an affront to meritocracy. Having so few women at the top cannot be a fair representation of the talent that's out there.

On the plus side, all of the candidates agreed in principle to restoring women's conference, though David Miliband always comes across as being quietly sceptical of giving anybody in the Labour Party more formal policymaking powers (a stance that makes his empowerment and community organising spiel sound rather hollow). However, he did express his support for job-sharing shadow cabinet posts, a solution that might help women balance top jobs with caring responsibilities.

Boo, hiss, tut

Changing the hours of parliament to become more family-friendly was also raised by Burnham, a suggestion that Balls supported, lamenting how all his campaign volunteers had recently "gone back to school". David Miliband poured cold water on Burnham's suggestion that remote voting from home might also help female MPs, saying he had visions of his son "getting confused about which was the red button and which was the green button".

Outside of matters that concern mainly women, the group seemed strong on deficit reduction and taking on the "big society". Ed Miliband made Ed Balls -- his former boss at the Treasury -- proud by saying that the coalition had no strategy for growth, and that the country had a Budget that was flexible enough to respond to the circumstances.

It was sad to hear Abbott sounding weakest on the economy -- her suggestion that we should split tax rises and spending cuts 50:50 seemed arbitrary, and she chose to talk about scrapping Trident rather than offer any solid economic analysis. However unfortunate this may be, she should know that women need to work doubly hard to come across as credible on the economy.

However, Abbott's wasn't the biggest boo-boo of the night. Burnham set the room hissing and tutting by failing to have heard about the case of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, a 43-year-old woman who has been sentenced to stoning for adultery in Iran.

But worse (if less-noticed) was the mistake by David Miliband, who was clearly friends with the chair and Daily Telegraph journalist Mary Riddell. As the hustings closed, he made her blush by unwittingly drawing her towards him for a kiss on both cheeks. She then felt obliged to try to kiss the other candiates, but clearly felt it inappropriate. Let's not have another man not realising when he's putting a woman in an awkward position.

Tags: Labour leadership

8 comments

jeremiah's picture

Sure, but just not THAT woman!

Kathryn Perera's picture

Great summary, thanks for this. I thought Ed Balls was unusually candid and came across well. Andy Burnham's answers were desperately disappointing, as you highlight.

@kathrynperera

Ellie Cumbo's picture

A very fair round-up of the highs and lows. Not to gang up, but Andy Burnham really was excruciatingly poor (a National Care Service is a worthy idea, but not just for women).

I was personally disappointed that all the answers on women's under-representation referred only to supply-side issues (reasons why women don't put themselves forward) instead of emphasising the lack of real demand from local parties with outdated ideas of what an MP looks like. Without more grassroots attempts to nurture good female candidates, the practicality of all-women shortlists as a long-term solution is severely limited. I'd like to see the leader put forward some strong, imaginative ideas on this in future.

swatantra nandanwar's picture

In fact Burnham came up with the most sensible answers: 31% is a fair reserve; its up to women then to push that figure up. to 50%.
And voting from home another good suggestion; often MPs are simply lobby fodder, kicking their heels hanging around the Commons waiting to vote at 10p, when they could be at home doing something more useful instead.
As far as remembering the Iranian woman stoning to death, not everyone can remember names that easily, and anyway, can our politicians please concentrate more on domestic policy and a little less on Foreign policy.
Jobsharing Cabinet posts is a non starter.
Abbott is extremely weak on finance and balancing the books. And we all know who wears the trousers in the Balls household; thats why Yvette is a future Leader and Ed not. D Milliband thinks he has it all but wrapped up, but he is wrong.
On the whole Andy Burnham shows more potential than the rest.

swatantra nandanwar's picture

Disappointed that they never got round to voting on adequate BAME representation in the Cabinet. The Party has a lot to learn.

Olli Issakainen's picture

I am a Finn living in Finland. Our president is a woman. Our PM is a woman. 11 members of our cabinet are women - 9 men.
It is a custom, not a law, that half of the cabinet are always women.
What have Scandinavian values of equality and solidarity done to Finland? According to British think-tank Finland is the world´s most prosperous country. And Newsweek recently wrote that Finland is the best place to live in the world.

Sheila Taylor's picture

Gender imbalance at the top of politics? Did anyone mention the situation at the bottom? One reason it's hard to get more women into the leadership is that two-thirds of all party members are men. We need to look more closely at what puts women off politics. The macho culture? The demands of children? (a problem for only one Balls parent?) Media intrusion into personal life? The list is endless....

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets